User talk:OceanHok/Archive 6

DYK for Ancestors: The Humankind Odyssey
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Copy edit request of Far Cry 3
Hi! I've finished my first pass at copy editing Far Cry 3. I have a few notes and questions for you: Would appreciate any clarification on these points. Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 19:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I just want to be sure, is there a single Rook Island or are Rook Islands a series of islands referred to under a collective name?
 * Meanwhile, Jason has an affair with Citra after she drugs him and has sex with him in a hallucination. Do they actually have an affair, or does Jason just think so due to the hallucination(s)?
 * The team would then manually adjust the placement of different objects and test the outpost. should that be 'output'?
 * It seems like there might be some repetition between the sections Plot and Development/Story. Plot is a little under 800 words and Story is a little under 900 (the recommended length for video game plots is 700 words WP:VG/CONTENT).  Given that Plot sets the context for Story, I felt that anything which repeats plot information or gameplay information should probably be cut to keep it focused on the development of the story.  Some specific cuts from Story which I'd recommend (or these could be moved to other sections):
 * In the game, players follow Jason, an innocent young man dragged into an insane and murderous journey on Rook Island.
 * The experience of Jason maturing is reflected in gameplay. Completing quests earns experience points and the game's upgrade trees slowly transform Jason into an effective combatant.
 * and that "it says something" about players themselves. Regarding the game's ending, where players can choose to kill his friends, Yohalem added that it will be interesting to examine why players could perform such actions. According to Yohalem, Far Cry 3 is a game that can "show [player's] angle" and allowed players to project what they view in the real world into what the game represents I felt like these quotes weren't terribly illustrative and I summarized the passage.
 * This creates a sense of discomfort to players. Does this fit under development?  Did they intent to create a sense of discomfort among the players?
 * A lot of the development section is based on interviews; some care should be taken to be clear these are primary sources which may be biased. (eg: according to developer X...)
 * Promotion and release might have non-notable details. According to Manual of Style/Video games, The use of release teasers, trailers, and social media is common throughout the industry, so specific details on these elements are generally unnecessary unless the nature of their presentation is something noted by sources.
 * Doug Creutz, an analyst from Cowen and Company, predicted that the game would reach 850,000 units sold in December 2012. I don't feel this projection is needed when there are actual sales figures.
 * "kill these characters in the game in order to finish your entertainment" I didn't find this quote in the source.
 * - Sorry for the late reply. Rook Islands is a tropical archipelago with several islands. It is difficult to say whether she has an affair with Citra, given that this game likes to blur reality and hallucinations, but I believed he has. I think "output" is a good alternative. I don't mind trimming the repeating parts of the development#story section, though I don't think its word limit is limited by WP:VGSCOPE. Yes, they intended to create a sense of discomfort. I think Doug Creutz can be removed if you think it is unimportant. The quote "kill these characters in the game in order to finish your entertainment" can also be removed as I cannot find its source. Thank you once again for the copyediting efforts! OceanHok (talk) 05:40, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Protection of the Varieties of Chinese
Hello- I would like to invite your comments and edits on a new page, Protection of the Varieties of Chinese, which is based on a Chinese Wikipedia article. Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Also, please don't remove tag without resolving the issue. Wikipedia is NOT a news / current affair website. Please wait for the publication of secondary source and then cite them, instead of adding content directly without cite.'' Matthew hk (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * - I admitted I put the source in the wrong place because of multiple edit conflicts. However, the RTHK source supports the statement about protesters fighting back with umbrella accurately and the problem of OR was resolved. That's why I removed the tag for OR because the issue is fixed. AdrianGamer (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Interpretation of the video and photo and other form of WP:primary source is strictly prohibited. It is an original research. Only thing that it is not original research, was something like simple calculation. Matthew hk (talk) 17:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. ''Again. Please don't remove the tag until there is SECONDARY SOURCE to describe the event. '' Matthew hk (talk) 17:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * What is the point of giving me two separate warning templates of two different levels based on 1 edit? Anyway, RTHK clearly described what happened. It interprets and describes the online videos (primary source), right? Unless your justification is that RTHK is a government-funded broadcasting service, or else I failed to see how it is a primary source. RTHK is a credible secondary source that also exercises press freedom, despite being positioned under the government. For the text: Some of those targeted used umbrellas to try to fight off their attackers. AdrianGamer (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Until Dawn
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Until Dawn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Megaman en m -- Megaman en m (talk) 16:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I am here to give you a heads-up that my review of Until Dawn has been completed.--Megaman en m (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I will close the review in seven days if no adjustments are made. You are free to renominate it afterward when you're ready.--Megaman en m (talk) 09:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello there, Hongkonger. Here's some vanilla ice cream!


Lakshmisreekanth (talk) has given you vanilla ice cream! Vanilla ice cream promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else vanilla ice cream, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

'''It's hot there at the protests. Have some ice cream.'''

To spread the goodness of vanilla ice cream, you can add {{subst:Vanilla ice cream}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Hey
Can I get some explaination on why you don't consider Persona 5 Royal "a new game" as noted by this revision? I'm quite confused by this removal, so I would really like to obtain some arguments on your behalfs. --SansUT (talk &#124; contributions) 02:20, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It is an expanded version of an existing game, thus it is not a new game. OceanHok (talk) 09:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * (sorry for being late) Not a new game? Does that mean the Persona 3 FES entry in the 2008 in video gaming table doesn't count? I'm pretty confused when you mean "expanded version of an exising game" being the logic of said game not being a new entry. --SansUT (talk &#124; contributions) 03:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Until Dawn
The article Until Dawn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Until Dawn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Megaman en m -- Megaman en m (talk) 09:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Help
Please help me by reverting relentless vandalism by 139.5.158.152 in 2019 Hong Kong protests, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.193.240.113 (talk) 10:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * - He was reported to the admin by another editor, so he will be blocked from editing soon. No need to worry too much. OceanHok (talk) 10:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

But there are thousands of visitors to the page everyday. It will make Wikipedia look bad if we leave such blatant vandalism in the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.193.240.143 (talk) 10:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Gentle suggestion
If you don't want to have to manually re-insert the non-controversial edits you make, I'd suggest holding off on the ones that are iffy on WP:NPOV until after you've finished clean-up. This will mean I won't need to revert a bunch of grammar fixes along with stuff that doesn't pass muster. Simonm223 (talk) 13:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Re: 2019 Hong Kong protests
I have remove the reference "grilling" from 2019 Hong Kong protests because it cannot be found. Feel free to add back the reference with the proper citation. Thanks! Hurricane111 (talk) 22:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Removal of maintenance template without before any discussion began.
Please do not remove maintenance templates if none of the issues at WP:WTRMT are reached. See, WP:WNTRMT for when you shouldn't be removing templates. KasimMejia (talk) 12:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)


 * - This was an abusive use of maintenance templates. You already have in place. A small and minor infobox issue does not justify the use of the big  template per WP:TN. What you are doing is essentially hijacking a RfC and then saying that everyone who disagreed with you WP:IDONTLIKEIT (in a discussion that has nothing to do with China or anything that contradicts your viewpoint) before a consensus has been reached, and then slapped a WP:POV template into the page because at this point no one agrees with you in the talk page (yet) in a RfC (surprise!) that isn't about how we handle China in the infobox. This behavior is uncivil.


 * I have no particular opinion as to whether China/US should be listed in the support section (so I didn't vote in the RfC), but I'd say starting another RfC In the talk page regarding the situation is a better idea than to slap a cleanup template hoping that some other editors would look and discuss at the talk page. OceanHok (talk) 13:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The non neutral inclusion of the belligerents in to the infobox is large enough issue that warrants a headline template. As for you telling me I'm doing this because everyone disagrees with me is a baseless accusation. What you're pretty much saying is, since everybody agrees on it, we can simply write original research material. You should read WP:DEM first of all regarding this, Wikipedia is not a ballot box and you can't break rules if you have majority.
 * I'll reiterate my discussion here. The article infobox cites 2 sources, which state China verbally supporting the HK gov, and includes China under Support per these sources. Yet in the RfC users have opposed the inclusion of US under support even though US congress passed a bill supporting the protests. The talk page is very pro-protester. That does not mean they get to break rules and neutrality. KasimMejia (talk) 13:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)


 * In the RfC, people agree with the removal of the US from the infobox, not keeping China in the infobox. They are not the same, and you drag China into the discussion. There is no "majority" decision with keeping China in the infobox because it does not exist. As I have said, the way to go is to start another RfC about China, not slapping a template if you really want to resolve the issue. OceanHok (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

I would accept your advice in principle. And yet, it can be hard to determine what one should or should not be as standalone article. I will consider the issue more carefully before giving you further responses. Universehk (talk) 21:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Consolidation of articles relating 2019 Hong Kong Protests
It seems not a bad idea for me to put protests in universities campus into one single article (e.g. 2019 Conflicts at Hong Kong Universities Campus). If we only combined all protests in one single article, it seriously harm the readability. It sounds better to cover other unis such as CityU/HKU as well. Universehk (talk) 22:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Project Gotham Racing 4 logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Project Gotham Racing 4 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Valiant Hearts: The Great War
Hello:

Your request for a copy edit of the article Valiant Hearts: The Great War by the Guild of Copy Editors has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * - Thanks for the help! OceanHok (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghost of Tsushima logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ghost of Tsushima logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for List of November 2019 Hong Kong protests
--valereee (talk) 00:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dreams logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dreams logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Misconduct allegations
I cannot access the article. Can you please copy and paste it somewhere (either on the talk page or on the article talk) and then delete it straight away, please? --  Ohc  ¡digame! 07:44, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * - Wouldn't that be a copyright violation? Anyway, maybe this link will work. OceanHok (talk) 11:55, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * When you cannot access an article, archive it to archive.org. --Izno (talk) 12:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Far Cry 3
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Far Cry 3 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Far Cry 3
The article Far Cry 3 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Far Cry 3 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Art of the 2019 Hong Kong protests
Hello! Your submission of Art of the 2019 Hong Kong protests at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Far Cry 3
The article Far Cry 3 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Far Cry 3 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Valiant Hearts: The Great War
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Valiant Hearts: The Great War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Art of the 2019 Hong Kong protests
Hello! Your submission of Art of the 2019 Hong Kong protests at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

FYI
The pig image has been nominated for deletion (see ) per Freedom of Panorama in Hong Kong. Yoninah (talk) 20:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * - I see the DYK nomination have been archived. Would it be possible if I replace the pig image with Pepe the Frog instead? File:P1110393 (48851461613).jpg. OceanHok (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. Your hook appeared on the main page today, without the image. There's nothing more we can do with it from the point of view of DYK. Yoninah (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Which is kinda pointless for a DYK about art... OceanHok (talk) 08:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Art of the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Valiant Hearts: The Great War
The article Valiant Hearts: The Great War you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Valiant Hearts: The Great War for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Valiant Hearts: The Great War
The article Valiant Hearts: The Great War you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Valiant Hearts: The Great War for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK help?
I asked two other editors to help get my DYK nomination passed, but they stopped replying. Wondering if you could come through for me. The past reviewers personally didn't like my hooks, suggesting that I agree to their own hooks being passed instead of mine, which in my opinion defeats the purpose. Cognissonance (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2019–20 Hong Kong protests, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. ''When you remove references from an article, use SHOW PREVIEW and check the references section for potential cite errors. Your recent removal of "ridiculous source cluster" created multiple cite errors. Thanks.''  Isaidnoway  (talk)  08:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Question about making my article about EITR, the video game
Hello! I happened to come across your userpage and saw that you like to contribute to articles about upcoming video games, and I am trying to make an article about the upcoming game EITR, which is developed by Eneme Entertainment. I am having some struggles finding sources that has significant coverage about the game. I know that the game may have been in Development hell for a while, but I have found some new information regarding the game that I think would make it possible to turn my draft in to an article. I wonder if maybe you have some input here or if you would like to give me some advice/ help me with the draft in any way :) DariuZzandor 13:41, 25 February 2020 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DariuZzandor (talk • contribs)
 * - If you can find sufficient reliable sources (RS) to justify the subject's notability, it should be fine. 5-6 RS is enough, assuming that it is not too soon for the subject to have an article. OceanHok (talk) 12:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for getting back to me! Yeah, will do my best to find enough sources for it. I think that I will wait a bit though, as you mention it may be too soon for an article for this specific game. Again, thank you! DariuZzandor 13:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
While this may be disruptive, I'm now inclined to believe that it's not 100% necessary in the lead. Yes, there's a lot of anger associated with it, but the kid isn't dead. The details are already in the body, and we mustn't lose sight of what it means to be concise and correctly summarise the article. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 11:16, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I understood the National Day incident is not as relevant as it used to be, but his behavior is certainly disruptive and he is clearing pushing WP:POV earlier. I agree that the lead can be trimmed. It is way too long. OceanHok (talk) 11:43, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree. See this --  Ohc  ¡digame! 11:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * - I don't think you can have "the first usage of live rounds" twice in the same event. It doesn't really make much sense to me. I mean, you can directly skip this part and said that the student was shot, but "the first usage of live rounds" happened on 25/8 and we have documented that in the history section. OceanHok (talk) 11:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hong Kong protests
Hey, I saw you undid my edit listing the cities of the solidarity protests and I was just wondering were the consensus was formed for it not to be listed. Thanks — RealFakeKim  T  16:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it is a silent consensus when the cities were removed. To be honest, having them all in the infobox is impractical because solidarity rallies happened in more than 50 cities. For the flag icon, you can find the RfC in the talk page. OceanHok (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Redirect of Splatoon 2: Octo Expansion
Hey there! You recently redirected Splatoon 2: Octo Expansion to Splatoon 2 with. I was wondering if this was a bold edit, or there was a discussion on this move beforehand? I could no find such a discussion on Talk:Splatoon 2: Octo Expansion, Talk:Splatoon 2, or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. –  PhilipTerryGraham (talk &middot;&#32;articles &middot;&#32;reviews) 02:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * - This is my edit summary. The parent article (Splatoon 2) is not long enough to warrant a split, and that the information in Octo Expansion is not substantial enough to be a standalone article. OceanHok (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Alrighty. Just as a point of advice, it would be helpful to provide information in both your summaries, instead of just the one. I didn't think to go looking for an explanation in the parent article, since it ultimately makes more sense to have a summary on the page that was redirected, in my view. –  PhilipTerryGraham (talk &middot;&#32;articles &middot;&#32;reviews) 07:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyedit request for Sea of Thieves
I'll be asking some questions over on its talk page. You'll receive a notification there soon. -- Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝)  05:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Changed to complete. -- Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝)  00:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

GA review for Clint Hocking
Are you preparing a GA review for Clint Hocking? There have been no edits to the article or the GA review page for about two weeks. – Reidgreg (talk) 15:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I still plan to do the review. However, I still have another GAN open with the same nominator (Talk:Media Molecule/GA1), so I may just let him finish that one first. OceanHok (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, good idea. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sea of Thieves
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sea of Thieves you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 22:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sea of Thieves
The article Sea of Thieves you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sea of Thieves for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Bureau: XCOM Declassified you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sea of Thieves
The article Sea of Thieves you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sea of Thieves for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 03:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
The article The Bureau: XCOM Declassified you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Bureau: XCOM Declassified for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
The article The Bureau: XCOM Declassified you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Bureau: XCOM Declassified for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 20:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Darkness II
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Darkness II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AntiGravityMaster -- AntiGravityMaster (talk) 03:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Darkness II
The article The Darkness II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Darkness II for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AntiGravityMaster -- AntiGravityMaster (talk) 03:40, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Darkness II
The article The Darkness II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Darkness II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AntiGravityMaster -- AntiGravityMaster (talk) 04:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Collaboration on 2019–20 Hong Kong protests
Hi OceanHok, Considering you have written 39.6% of the article and edited it nearly 700 times I was wondering if you would like to help me got the article to Good Article or even Featured Article status. Considering it is such a big article I would really appreciate the help. You clearly have extensive knowledge of the GA criteria which would certainly help as I'm still a newbie in my eyes. This probably sounded super cringy so sorry about that, but please consider helping as I want to give something to the protesters. Thanks in advance realFakeKim
 * - Sure, I can work with you on bringing the article to GA in the future. I do have plans to bring some of the subarticles like tactics and art to GA. This is actually my first time working on an article about a political subject too. However, I don't think we should push the article for GA/FA status when the protests are still ongoing, especially since this is a controversial subject. What we can do now is to ensure that the article is updated, the coverage is broad enough and see if we can bring the article back to WP:ITN when the protests pick up steam again. You can ask in the talk page of the protests article to see if other editors are interested as well. I am sure many editors from WP:HK have it watchlisted. OceanHok (talk) 17:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you give a full list of the subarticles you plan to get to GA I can see if I can add to them. I'm trying my best to keep it updated but I'm translating it from the chinese articles so if you can help translate we can update some of the timeline from around September where the Chinese version has more information. Considering you live in Hong Kong do you think the protests will pick up to where they where because right now it's not looking good for them. — RealFakeKim  T  17:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't really have a list. The bulk of my attention is on the main article. I don't think we need to mention smaller protests for the earlier timeline articles because we want to focus on the significant ones that were reported by the foreign press or HK local english press (e.g. SCMP, Standard, HKFP, RTHK). Among the subarticles we have now, the only articles that can pass a GAN review now are the Extradition bill, Hong Kong Way, Blitzchung controversy and Glory to Hong Kong. For other articles, we need to wait until the end of the protests. When the coronavirus crisis is settled, I am pretty confident that large-scale protests will continue, and the LegCo election results in September will decide where the movement will go. That's just my analysis. OceanHok (talk) 18:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. If not smaller protests than some other timeline things like the stuff I added in the April article about the politicians arrested etc. By the way when you say they can pass a GA review do you mean unedited or with work? — RealFakeKim  T  18:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The politician arrest stuff is certainly ok. In the past, the title was "list of protests" and the scope was a bit narrower. The scope is now larger with "timeline" and information other than major protests can be included. The articles I have just mentioned certainly still need some work. You can find the main contributors by browsing the edit history and see if it is possible for collaboration. Glory to Hong Kong is a GA in zh-wiki as well. OceanHok (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll put a message the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests talk padge and see if anyone else is willing to help. So far I see two main goals we have:
 * Make sure all articles relating to the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests are up to date with the latesting information from English and Chinese news sources
 * Improve articles of events that have already happened (e.g. Causes of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests, Timeline of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests (March–June 2019) & Chinese University of Hong Kong conflict) to GA/FA level — RealFakeKim  T  07:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of XCOM 2
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article XCOM 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 14:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of XCOM 2
The article XCOM 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:XCOM 2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 15:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of XCOM 2
The article XCOM 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:XCOM 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Hi, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Request on 19:07:48, 30 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Shruikan99
Hi OceanHok,

I'd love for some advice on how I can improve my article for re-submission. Huge fan of the Besiktas FC team and hope to build some of their wiki pages here.

-Shruikan99

Shruikan99 (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2020 (UTC)


 * - Please see WikiProject Video games/Sources and find reliable sources (RS) to support the content of the article. You also need to use reliable sources to demonstrate notability. OceanHok (talk) 07:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Hi, I wanted to thank you for moving the article Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales to it's current form. I didn't know if I were to call it, as it is an add onto Marvel's Spider-Man but the Marvel part felt out of place. Thanks for clearing it up. Captain Galaxy (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)