User talk:Onceshook1

Welcome!

 * }

Why I have been blocked? There has been no edit war from my side nor I have created some ruckus. I have received praises from people for giving references and improving articles. Dharmdyaksha there is no proper reason to have me blocked.Just because I disagree with you, you cannot block me. Onceshook1 (talk) 11:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No one has blocked you. You can still edit. §§ §§ {T/C} 17:54, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shehzada, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Shehzada was changed by Onceshook1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901554 on 2012-01-06T03:02:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Chakravyuha (disambiguation)
Hello. Just letting you know that this has been nominated for speedy deletion, using Template:db-disambig. Please see WP:TWODABS. Feel free to remove it if you disagree. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  16:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Songs of Rajesh Khanna
Could you please provide source where it is said that Rajesh Khanna has sung songs for Safar, Ajnabee and also some other movies where you have added him as singer (not sure if imdb is a good source of this) and also please don't overlink as you did in Ajnabee. Torreslfchero (talk) 13:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Hangal
While you added usefll sources, you also made several unsourced additions/changes. Please cite these, such as his birthdayLihaas (talk) 06:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The sources we have list his afe as 95, what you added dint have a source. Do you have something to indicate this? If so, then we can change it. (mind you, i know for a fact the indian media is rubbish. worked there and had collgeaues at other outlets who indicate they source from WP. But we still need some source)Lihaas (talk) 11:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I wasnt disputing that he may be (and he tv9/rediff are plausible), its just that at the time there was no source. Though now we have ostensible contradictions with RS. Perhps query this on talk on elsewhere. I dont know which one to believe. Also the ones dont mention the ate.Lihaas (talk) 11:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * For the records, oyou added some sources to a worefully undersourced page. Kudos on that. We need a lo tmore too though ;)Lihaas (talk) 11:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Some nice additions with sources, but wheres the 1914 number coming from? We now have 1914, 1915, and 1917.Lihaas (talk) 01:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the link Onceshook1. I'll go through the book and add what's possible. Jay (talk) 15:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Statistics
Please stop addings statistics like "A had 6 hits and 3 flops with B and 2 hits and 8 flops with C" to Bollywood actor's pages. Thats a poor way of writing encyclopedia. Also the references you are giving are not very best at reliability. Hence please stop giving such mathematical puzzles to our readers. §§ §§ {T/C} 07:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * You claimed here that Shehzada received "4 stars by critics in Bollywood Guide Collections". That claim is not supported by the supporting reference. §§ §§ {T/C} 07:30, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Mr. Dhamrdyaksha /Animesh Kulkarni - http://entertainment.in.msn.com/gallery.aspx?cp-documentid=4155691&page=9 - Aanchal was a hit, Shehzada was a box office hit too - see http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-10-05/news-interviews/30246701_1_boney-anil-kapoor-woh-saat-din and http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=178&catName=MTk3Mg== and for Daag - see http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=179&catName=MTk3Mw==. So that proves Rakhee had all her 3 films with Khanna has hits and so there is a need to mention that. As far as Bollywood Collections - is concerned its a boOK where stars are provided - 4 0r 5 etc and also movies are categorised as Gold or Silver indicating whether its a hit of flop. If its a flop you would not find any stars or classification as gold or silver.Search for it in google books. Onceshook1 (talk) 05:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Box Office India calls Shehzada as "semi-hit". What Anil Kapoor calls it is immaterial. Box Office India doesn't even include Aanchal (1980 film) in its top 25 list of that year. What glamour website MSN calls it is immaterial. And if you are claiming certain stars for a certain film based on some book, provide reference to that book in the article. People are not gonna wait for me to question it and then read your answer on your talk page. §§ §§ {T/C} 07:17, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Onceshook, please read WP:OR. Many people have asked you to do this in the past. You must not draw your own conclusions based on information from different sources. And the information is trivial and meaningless in either case, ad Dharmadhyakshal rightly points out. Please stop adding that kind of synthesis without encyclopedic value unless you get a consensus in the ARTICLE talk pages (not your own talk page, or somebody else's user talk page) in favour of it.--bonadea contributions talk 07:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Surinder Kapoor's son (producer of Shehzada) - himself accepts that the film worked well. What better source do you require? The box office site calls it semi hit meaning it did work well.Onceshook1 (talk) 18:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Have a look at the talk page of Rakhee article.Have answered back all queries. Onceshook1 (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Shrik88music for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. §§ §§ {T/C} 09:19, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
Your original block was because of disruptive editing. To address the point you make above, you were informed many times, and given many links to relevant policies, about the fact that all facts do not belong in Wikipedia. Just because something is verifiable does not mean it is encyclopedic. Your endless adding of minor trivia details is one of several reasons your editing is disruptive. Hence, your block was clearly not "unnecessary", and the only way you could be allowed to edit Wikipedia again is to make an unblock appeal that shows that you understand how your previous editing was disruptive. Creating a new account (and continuing the same behaviour) will only make it less and less likely that you will ever be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. --bonadea contributions talk 20:35, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Do you understand that creating new accounts is not allowed, regardless of whether you are unblocked or not? You said that you were forced to open [a] new account - that is completely incorrect, you should not have created any new accounts at all when you were first blocked. Nobody forced you to act disruptively, like you did when you deceptively created new accounts. (Please note that I am a regular editor and not an administrator. I can't block or unblock editors and don't have the same knowledge of the blocking policies as the administrators have. I certainly made no promises about what would happen if you did in fact submit a valid unblock request, I just made the observation that it was the only way you could be allowed to edit again.) --bonadea contributions talk 07:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)