User talk:OneWeirdDude

Welcome
Hi and welcome to wikipedia. I noticed you had a blank talk page, so I decided to welcome you. I hope you like it and decide to stay. Here are some handy links for newcomers. Also you can sign your name on talk pages and vote pages with three tildes like this, and your name with a time stamp with four like this ~. Howabout1 22:24, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Welcome
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Help pages
 * Village pump
 * help desk
 * Wiquette

Mood?
What happens when you click on the mood image on my userpage? Is it still obscured? Strange. I've never had anyone else complain, and I understand I'm not using any non-standard wiki code. -- Longhair 04:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

The weather in London
You know you should not edit the weather in London. But you did so twice. Have a 15 minute break, as you are blocked. --Henrygb 01:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Humph. Some people have no sense of humor.  (Just kidding!) 00:03, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Signature
You can go here if you want a tutorial for coloring, etc.

Do you have any familiarity with HTML and wiki-code? It's very simple, I did mine using and tags to put my Hello in between, so it stays on top (with a link to my talk page). As for Fetofs, the only thing I've done is to put a link to Esperanza using e.

However, don't copy my signature! F e tofs Hello! 10:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Please Sign
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Alphachimp talk  18:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help
I noticed you've been doing good work on many of the articles chosen as Mormon Collaborations. I wanted to drop you a note and give you props. I look forward to working on many more articles with you in the future. uriah923(talk) 02:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * This note is the only sort of props I know that I can give. I guess you might consider putting a lot of work into an article and then seeing it dubbed "good" or "featured" as a sort of compensation. That's happened to a couple of the Mormon Collaboration pieces... --uriah923(talk) 02:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Succession boxes
Hello - I've finally some time to twiddle today. Can you tell me what you mean by "making the succession box fit into tight spaces" ? Perhaps have you solved this already? Cheers. THE PROMENADER  09:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Invite
Clamster5 22:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

BoM Linguistics
I took a look at the article. It seems to need a lot of organizational work. I suggest you add it to the Mormon Collaboration list. uriah923(talk) 18:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Style note
Hi. Just a note about this edit. Per style conventions, one should not use links in section names (they also look ugly :) Instead, one should find a way to embed them naturally within the body of text. Small thing, but worth noting. :) Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Correction on edit
Hi, Just wanted to mention a small correction in your edit. The quotation from Gödel, Escher, Bach actually reads "Is the soul greater than the hum of its parts?" which is a Spoonerism, meaning that an alternate sentence arises by switching two phonemes. In this case the alternate sentence is derived by switching the "s" sound (from "soul") and the "huh" sound (from "hum") to form "Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?"! So in this case, "hum" is not a typographical mistake as you mentioned in your edit. I corrected the mistake and thought you'd like to know. Aravind Alwan 05:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Linguistics and the Book of Mormon
Partially due to your vote, Linguistics and the Book of Mormon has been selected as the Mormon collaboration of the month. I look forward to working with you on the article. uriah923(talk) 21:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Shiblon
Partially due to your vote, Shiblon has been selected as the Mormon collaboration of the month. I look forward to working with you on the article. uriah923(talk) 17:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Merge Proposal
Please weigh in on the merger proposal between Persons in the Book of Mormon and List of Book of Mormon people. You are receiving this notice since you were identified as a recent editor on one of those pages. Thanks! --Descartes1979 (talk) 19:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIII - April 2008
The April 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 22:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Shogi‎
Hello, Imagine that in Shogi Dan 1 to 3 are not professional. SunCreator (talk) 02:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008
The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 08:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008
The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 03:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Calling all active WP:NOVELS members
 WikiProject Novels Roll Call WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!

Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María ( habla con migo ) 18:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008
This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Formula
Thanks for fixing some junk in Formula. It was introduced in the preceding edit an hour earlier, along with other errors I have fixed. If you spot clear nonsense like this in an article then it's often a good idea to click "history" and see whether the page has been vandalized recently. In this case all of it could have been fixed by reverting the preceding edit, for example by clicking "undo". PrimeHunter (talk) 02:08, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Stalemate
Hi, I've undone your recent edit to Stalemate - the 4 diagrams are meant to use some of the dead space to the right of the TOC, because even in a 2x2 square they are taller than the section "Simple examples" to which they relate. But thanks for taking an interest in the article. -- Philcha (talk) 20:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Hannah Montana
What do you want to change on the HM Episodes page? Thanks :D. - Alec2011 (talk) 21:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

tenjiku
Hi Weird,

With your edit at tenjiku shogi, you're saying that if a lion is surrounded by other pieces, it cannot be used to pass a turn. AFAIK that is not true of Chu. Do you have a ref? kwami (talk) 21:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I don't know where I got that. In WP-ja, it just says that you can move to an adjacent square, then back or to some other adjacent square, or you can jump to anything in a two-square radius. kwami (talk) 22:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello OneWeirdDude! I have moved one of your recent articles here. Please develop the article and move it to the article namespace only when you're done. I've added the userspace draft template. Regards, Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 16:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Episode 30 (Beyond Belief) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Episode 30 (Beyond Belief) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Episode 30 (Beyond Belief) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 18:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...

- Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/81Dojo concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/81Dojo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/81Dojo


Hello OneWeirdDude. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "81Dojo".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 21:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Shogi#Winning
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Shogi. regarding this you made to Shogi by Marchjuly (talk) 22:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikiproject Shogi
Hi OneWeirdDude,

I hope you're still interested in working on shogi-related stuff. It's nice to run into other editors on Wikipedia who are actual shogi players. I think there are lots of ways that many of the shogi-articles already on Wikipedia can be improved and there are lots of new articles that can be created. I see that you were working on an article called "81 Dojo", but stopped before it was completed. I'm trying to create some articles on my own too, but there's seems to be so many that need to be created that it's hard to figure out where to begin. Personally, I think it would be better if there was some kind of structure to work within where people really interested in shogi and who know alot about it could get together and discuss shogi-related articles, etc. which is why I made a proposal to start a new Wikiproject called Wikiproject Shogi. It hasn't generated much interest so far, but please check it out and let me know what you think. Of course, it's Wikipedia so everybody is welcome to participate, but it would also be nice to have actual shogi players involved too for advice and suggestions. - Marchjuly (talk) 01:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for supporting that proposal. Please feel free to contribute in any way that you can. So far, only four editors have expressed support for this idea which is probably not enough to start a new project from scratch. It may, however, be enough to be taken on as a task force by an already established Wikiproject or Wikiprojects. - Marchjuly (talk) 04:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Chu shogi: "queens" for 奔王
I replied. Double sharp (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Go ranks and ratings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shodan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

shogi minor edit
hi. I made a minor edit on the shogi page just now, but i forgot to mark it as minor. I'm sorry. It's not my habit yet. I'll do better.... (i also made more 'major?' edits: [a] adding an new image, [b] reverting an incorrect rule description concerning checkmate) – ishwar  (speak)  20:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Amoron for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amoron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amoron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rollidan (talk) 21:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Nana shogi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nana shogi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nana shogi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk YO! 12:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Studio C episodes
dose you want to help make a list of Studio C episodes Fanoflionking  23:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Mathematical alphabet
Think you should probably add for z and w their use as arbitrary complex numbers. Not to mention n as a general integer. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 06:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. If you have any more suggestions, don't hesitate. :-) OneWeirdDude (talk) 04:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, here we go. ;)
 * c - a constant (both cases; maybe also a, b, d, e, f if you need more; maybe also &alpha;, &beta;, &gamma;...)
 * e - the identity element
 * f - general function
 * g - general element of a group (usually G); also a second function if needed
 * h (and H) - when we need another one; also for the lowercase, the increment in the definition of the derivative (which you may also know as &Delta;x); also a third function if needed
 * k - maybe a third element of a group, maybe also a constant
 * M - an upper bound on magnitude (cf. Weierstrass M-test)
 * N - a normal subgroup
 * n - a normal vector
 * p - general prime; general polynomial function
 * q - a second general prime or polynomial function; also maybe a general quaternion; quotient
 * r - remainder
 * s - arc length (so ds is an arc length element)
 * t - a tangent vector; also a general parameter
 * T - a linear map (S and U may be extra ones)
 * V - a general region in R3; a general vector space (in that case W is probably another one)
 * v - a general vector (u and w may be extra ones)
 * X - a general random variable (also Y, etc.)
 * &gamma; - a parametrisation of a curve
 * &delta; - a second small positive number in analysis, usually dependent on &epsilon;
 * &epsilon; - small positive number, in analysis
 * &eta; - something related to y
 * &theta; - angular polar/cylindrical coordinate; colatitude in spherical coordinates; the first angle in a problem
 * &lambda; - a parameter, or an eigenvalue
 * &mu; - a second one to accompany &lambda;, if necessary; also the mean
 * &xi; - something related to x, maybe some specific point in the middle of an interval
 * &pi; - a general plane
 * &rho; - a third general permutation; maybe also the radial spherical coordinate, or density
 * &Sigma; - a general surface in R3
 * &sigma; - standard deviation; also maybe a general permutation
 * &tau; - a second general permutation
 * &phi; - longitudinal spherical coordinate; the second angle in a problem; also maybe a general function
 * That's just off the top of my head so far. ^_^ I haven't included symbols that usually mean a specific thing (e.g. e, &pi;), unless they're also used for some other "general" thing. Double sharp (talk) 04:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Argh! I forgot Z the standard normal random variable! ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 10:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks. :-) OneWeirdDude (talk) 19:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Pahoran for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pahoran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pahoran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Big Money Threepwood (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)