User talk:Operator873/Archive 4

SPI of the Phyliss Shand Allfrey army
FYI: Sockpuppet investigations/Phyllisshandallfrey1996
 * I appreciate all the work you're doing. Thanks for the message! Operator873 CONNECT 23:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  00:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Kitty power
Thank you so much for the kitten. The best thing that happened to me all day.

One passer by (talk) 18:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Discussing your edits
Hi Operator873. I see you recently reverted my edits with respect to the classification of Falun Gong as 'modern' (notice that I was actually doing a partial revert of a change made a few days ago). You're correct that the practice was first publicly taught in 1992, which is certainly modern. But perhaps you missed the fact that it claims an ancient lineage. Some 'qigong' practices in China (much like yogic practices in India) date back millennia, having been passed down orally through generations of masters and disciples, typically in private. Falun Gong claims a similar lineage, and this is not a claim that we can test one way or another. Therefore, just as we would avoid buying into the branding of Falun Gong as an ancient practice, we should also avoid unilaterally declaring it a modern practice. Best to remain agnostic. Anyway, this was my rationale, so I hope you'll consider undoing your reversion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A6A0:E42:2C97:AE7D:6731:EFC1 (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand that "qigong" is an ancient practice. I also understand "Falun Gong" identifies with and claims connection to qigong. However, that claim doesn't make itself ancient. Case in point, would we refer to a modern hammer as an ancient tool since our ancestors used rocks as hammers? Falun Gong is a modern development based on an ancient concept. I'd suggest further discussion take place on the talk page. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia and don't be afraid to be bold! Operator873 CONNECT 03:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Pending changes
Hi Operator873, I see that you have recently been granted the Pending Changes reviewer permission. Please ensure that you do not accept edits that add unsourced content to BLPs, especially in articles that have been protected specifically to prevent such edits. I unreviewed your acceptance of this edit as it introduced unsourced material about a future role and also broke the template. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I truly appreciate the oversight you provide in this environment. I was working an unusual overnight shift and wasn't at the best of my game at the time. I had intended to accept the change, then add this article as a source for the change. I apparently was distracted and forgot to add it. At this point, I believe it's a moot issue though as there have been additional edits since then. As a general rule of habit, I try to verify changes and add sources to the change, if it is accurate. I apologize for the dropped ball. That is thoroughly my fault. Operator873 CONNECT 20:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I hope you didn't take my note as criticism, it was only meant as a reminder as these things do slip through from time to time. Thank you for all that you do here.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I will always welcome criticism. A tree does not grow strong in the absence of wind. That being said, I didn't take your messages as anything other than a "heads-up" and thought it was quite polite and cordial. Operator873 CONNECT 20:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Concerning User talk:2602:304:CEBF:8650:5098:759E:40E0:34DF, Re: October 2017
Just to let you know, I DID leave an accurate edit summary as to why I removed content from Major film studio ("Removed unnecessary reference for LGE, as LGE is no longer listed as Lionsgate's parent"; FYI, LGE=Lions Gate Entertainment). It's not my fault that you didn't see that LGE was removed from the table as the studio parent for Lionsgate Films & replaced with Lions Gate Motion Picture Group. Now, revert a completely valid edit of mine again, & I will report your actions as article vandalism. 2602:304:CEBF:8650:5098:759E:40E0:34DF (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Changes on M or F?
Hi Operator873,

The reason I changed the name (Kieran Verret -->) on the M or F? article is because I am Kieran Verret, and I prefer to go by K. Alexander Verret. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.198.99.255 (talk) 21:27, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia! If such is the case, please take a look at this policy prior to making any further edits. Operator873 CONNECT 21:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

John Hussey, 1st Baron Hussey of Sleaford
Hi, just wanted to let you know that the edits you reverted at the above were made by a serial non-WP:CIR editor who regularly edits 'aristocracy' type pages and is well-known to the volunteers at the help desk. Has an account but edits both from that and multiple IPs equally. They had already come to the HD for help (does so very often). Just wanted to let you know as your edit may be also reverted so we can fix up. Cheers, Eagleash (talk) 02:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I sincerely appreciate the message! I'm sorry if my AGF revert interrupted the process. Let me know if I can be of any help regarding this editor or any other editors. Operator873 CONNECT 03:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've edited the page as our chum wanted I think. Nearly got into as big a muddle as they do! They come to the help desk all the time with the same errors...usually "ref No. X is all wrong, please fix" No matter how often they've been told what goes in what param. nope, just types away... :) Eagleash (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Human rights in Azerbaijan
Dear Operator873, I would like to ask you why you reverted or eliminated my edits in the page of Human Rights in Azerbaijan. I think I provided valid sources for edits. Thank you. Human7777 (talk) 05:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I responded on the talk page of the article. Your edits have been restored with my sincerest apologies. Operator873 CONNECT 21:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Human7777 (talk) 05:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing El Sueño (Diljit Dosanjh song), Operator873.

Unfortunately TonyBallioni has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"Not G12 eligible, copyvio removed and revdel'd. Article still needs review for other inclusion criteria."

To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.

TonyBallioni (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Brannock High School
Some one has deleted all of brannock high schools information and copy and pasted Taylor Highschools Informationen CabbageSarah (talk) 22:00, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I appreciate you letting me know. I'm working on resolving the vandalism now. Operator873 CONNECT 22:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

hi
hey bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.131.50.133 (talk) 03:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your courteous message
Thank you for your courteous message. 66.162.249.170 (talk) 23:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You're quite welcome. If there's anything can do to help, please let me know. Operator873 CONNECT 23:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Time Signature (Music)
Howdy! I just made a small change in the beginning of `Time signature`, mainly because the Double-Time link seems to be obsolete, since it`s been merged with Half-time. So your correction is not necessary. My username is Double Plus Ungood. I`m just on another computer and couldn`t be bothered to remember my password. Best Wishes, 70.29.227.218 (talk) 02:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the kind message. On further review, I have reinstated your change. Thank you for your constructive edits and helping make Wikipedia a better place. Be Bold. Operator873 CONNECT 02:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Coventry Mall
I am trying to update the Coventry Mall page as there is a decent amount of relevant information missing about the location! I am the Current Manager of the Property and want to add the new information! It however seems to no longer give me the option. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JBartholomew805 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * With that in mind, I strongly urge you to read this policy and make the changes necessary to disclose your affiliation. Operator873 CONNECT 21:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/PShandAllfrey
is open if you wish to opine. Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

ssshhh be wery, wery quiet
I'm hunting wabbits ducks. Let the quacking continue. To mix metaphors, we need to feed 'em more rope. Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * HAHA! I was going to add that to the thread, but you had already beat me to it. Well done. Keep up the hard work! Operator873 CONNECT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Inderscience Publishers
Please read my comments in the talk section of Inderscience Publishers. Thanks. Simiprof (talk) 22:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Xi Jinping and Xi Jinping Thought
Hey, it's weird. Please tell me how I could provide sources for the fact both Xi Jinping's cult of personality is merely alleged by western media. --Whoeverer (talk) 02:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * You'll have to find a major and independent source to support your addition. For more information, please refer to this or reach out on the article's talk page for more assistance. Thanks! Operator873 CONNECT 02:10, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:43, 23 November 2017 (edit) Operator873 (talk | contribs) (General note: Removal of content, blanking on Milton, Massachusetts. (TW))
I am new to editing wikipedia, so this was somewhat of an experiment. I removed the "T.S. Eliot attending Milton Academy" entry because that belongs on the school's alumni list, not the town's list of notable residents. T.S. Eliot was from St. Louis and resided in England. It seems like a bit of a cheap stretch to claim him as a resident if he only boarded at Milton Academy for a few years. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.179.244 (talk) 19:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm very glad you are trying your hand at editing. I understand your intent with the removal of T. S. Elliot. So not a big issue. If you have any questions during your journey into editing, please feel free to leave me another message on my talk page or head over to The Teahouse where several experienced editors stand willing to assist our newest folks. Again, thank you for your contributions and welcome to Wikipedia! Operator873 CONNECT 20:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

I was alerted (4 times) of edits that I did not make to "Richard C. Tallman," a page I have never heard of, let alone edited.

Alert 1, 23:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC): "...One or more of your recent contributions to Richard C. Tallman have been undone because they did not appear constructive..."

Alert 2, 23:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC): "Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis, as you did to Richard C. Tallman..."

Alert 3, 00:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC): "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Richard C. Tallman, you may be blocked from editing..."

Alert 4, 00:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC): "You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Richard C. Tallman."

This is inaccurate. Please correct.