User talk:Patricia Meadows

DYK
I nominated your article Simon J. Hall for DYK. Joe Chill (talk) 22:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Looking for the appropriate emoticon... Here we go! :-} (lol!) Patricia Meadows (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The article has been accepted for DYK. Joe Chill (talk) 01:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Jonathan L. Halperin
Nice work. This might be a good candidate for DYK. ALI nom nom 16:44, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you! *blush* Patricia Meadows (talk) 16:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Question
Hi there Patricia Meadows, I noticed that you occasionally revert vandalism, and do a good job in doing it. Would you be interested in having rollback rights being granted to your account? Best. Acalamari 20:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Indeed I would. Thank you! :) Patricia Meadows (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Done! Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Best. Acalamari 20:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Peter Palese
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peter Palese, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://knol.google.com/k/peter-palese/-/14p2mu07xc9ro/0.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I removed the copyright flag as I believe it is in error. I will fix it if I'm wrong! :-} Patricia Meadows (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I have tagged this article as closely paraphrasing some sources as I feel it needs to be revised. I have left an example and some comments on the talk page. In reviewing your other contributions I also noticed that Jonathan L. Halperin also closely follows some sources and so I have tagged it for revision as well. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help. I have edited Peter Palese in an effort to address copyright concerns. I have left the paraphrase tag up in case I didn't do enough. Please let me know! (I will address Jonathan L. Halperin next.) Patricia Meadows (talk) 16:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Re-wrote Jonathan L. Halperin. Again, I left the paraphrase tag in case I didn't go far enough. Please let me know. Thanks. Patricia Meadows (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Deletion nomination on an article you created
There's a concern about Derek Morgan Bush that it falls afoul of our policies on living people, basically an extended version of the notability concern. We avoid having articles on people who are famous for only one event, and while some remain (e.g. Jared Lee Loughner) the general guidance is to include them in other articles. Given that this person is not particularly famous, it's unlikely we would include them in anything else, so deletion is one thing to consider. Your input is appreciated. SDY (talk) 20:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I vote for delete. I created that article ages ago and I much better understand the notability guidelines now. Thanks for your attention to the matter! Patricia Meadows (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Good to know. Thanks for your time.  SDY (talk) 00:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Immunology
I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention.  Kinkreet ~&#9829;moshi moshi&#9829;~ 09:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Steely Dan
Why this reversion? CCS81 (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


 * No harm intended. The revision I was intending to undo was this one as I thought adding "as well as rock and pop musics" to the "Musical and lyrical style" did not improve the article. Patricia Meadows (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. I only added it to complete the sentence, which states that Steely Dan draws on "various" musical styles but then only cites one: jazz.  I don't deny that the paragraph, and indeed whole style section, needs work.  Your edit was a rollback and undid other unrelated changes I made, which is why I asked.  Best, CCS81 (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Arthur L. Jenkins, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel M. Labow for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel M. Labow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel M. Labow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612261315 your edit] to Eric J. Nestler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * minutes103rd.html |title=National Institute on Drug Abuse |publisher= |accessdate=9 June 2014 }} as Council Member of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (for which he served as

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Revert on Shaed
Hi Patricia, just wanted to let you know that I have reverted your move of Shaed to SHAED. Page moves need to be done using the method at Help:How to move a page. Moves should not be done by copying and pasting the article text, as the page history does not get transferred when you do this. Additionally, this is a move that is not merely technical but is in fact controversial, and therefore it would need to be discussed first; see Requested moves for info on how to do that. However, I think it's unlikely that this move would be supported by the community, as it goes against the Manual of Style on trademarks. Even though the band typically writes their name in all caps, Wikipedia typically converts all caps names to titlecase (e.g. Kiss (band) and Time (magazine)).

Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Iago Qnsi  (User talk:IagoQnsi) 13:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Understood. I jumped the gun on that one. Thank you for the clarification! Patricia Meadows (talk) 03:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)