User talk:PeaBrainC

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw your edits at Patch clamp. You might perhaps also be interested in WP:WikiProject Neuroscience. Please feel free to get in touch with me at User talk:Tryptofish any time if you have any questions at all about editing Wikipedia. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Small request for Heart
Hi PeaBrainC! Thank you for your well-written and logical edits to Heart, I have one small request. As you can see, the article "Heart" is a good article. You can see that from the icon in the top right hand corner. That means it had to pass through peer review for prose, references etc. I would be very grateful if you could provide some references to verify what you've written, so that the article can maintain its high standard into the future :). Hope to work with you on an article in the future! --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks Tom (LT) - I had every intention to cite sources but ran out of time yesterday. All done now.PeaBrainC (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Your GA nomination of T-tubule
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article T-tubule you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tom (LT) -- Tom (LT) (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

The article T-tubule you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:T-tubule for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tom (LT) -- Tom (LT) (talk) 10:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for T-tubule
Hello! Your submission of T-tubule at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Yoninah, thanks for your comment, I have reworded this article to explicitly mention this fact rather than let it be assumed from the existing wording. Hope it's ok now.  PeaBrainC (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cell isolation has been accepted
 Cell isolation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Boghog (talk) 14:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Cell_isolation help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

DYK for Cell isolation
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Cell isolation at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brugada syndrome
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brugada syndrome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Natureium -- Natureium (talk) 16:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

The article Brugada syndrome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brugada syndrome for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Natureium -- Natureium (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Openhrt-default-cover.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Openhrt-default-cover.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Brugada syndrome
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Short QT syndrome
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Short QT syndrome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canada Hky -- Canada Hky (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello - I had a chance to get some of my initial thoughts in place, if you have a chance to take a look. Canada Hky (talk) 18:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Good to go - thanks for your help! Canada Hky (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

The article Short QT syndrome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Short QT syndrome for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canada Hky -- Canada Hky (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Hemothorax GA review
What do I still need to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Mulch Civic (Pro) (talk • contribs) 20:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I have finished the problens that you have mentioned on the review page. Is it ready now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Mulch Civic (Pro) (talk • contribs) 18:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the slow response - have been away. The article is looking better after your efforts but there is still more to do to get it to GA - some sections are good but the prose in other sections remains disorganised e.g. Diagnosis. Some sources do not meet WP:MEDRS criteria. There are still too many similar images. I will make detailed suggestions when I'm home next week. PeaBrainC (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi PeaBrain, I have fixed everything you have left on the Hemothorax talk page. What more needs to be done to get this to GA?


 * Well done for all your hard work. Please could you tag all the specific items I suggested as ✅ or  with a rationale - I'm not sure if all have been addressed.  I have added some suggestions for the Management and the Prognosis sections.  PeaBrainC (talk) 13:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Peabrain, What more do I need to do? I have finished everything you said — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Mulch Civic (Pro) (talk • contribs) 23:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . There are still a couple of points that have not been checked on the review page - e.g. the Datta reference still needs replacing.  One of the images you have added doesn't show a hemothorax at all (the hamartoma image).  The prose can still be improved a lot but I will tackle this.  When you've ticked off all the suggestions one way or another and when I've tidied up the prose I intend to get a 2nd opinion to make sure that I haven't lost perspective on the article (it's my first GA review and after quite a few weeks of changes I think that's probably good practice. Hope that's ok PeaBrainC (talk) 12:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Now that I removed the reference you said to remove, is it best to wait until you polish the prose in the rest of the article? Steve Mulch Civic (Pro) 13:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Honored to be asked to sit in on this GA review. Reminds me of the process I went through bringing Vitamin C to GA status, where I had the reviewer and several interested parties all leaving recommendations. I did some ref repair and left a bulleted list of recommendations. Also left a note to this effect at Steve's Talk. David notMD (talk) 12:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have nothing more to add (or substract) from the Hemothorax GA effort. David notMD (talk) 15:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks David, I will close it. PeaBrainC (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Hans Gustav Wilhelm Steinert
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you Gerda! Not sure if I deserve it but your encouragement is much appreciated! PeaBrainC (talk) 10:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 * A year ago, you were recipient no. 2160 of Precious, a prize of QAI, and I'm sure you deserve it! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Francis Fontan
Hello! Your submission of Francis Fontan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 15:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Tom Ballard (climber)
Hello! Your submission of Tom Ballard (climber) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bryanrutherford0 -- Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

The article Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bryanrutherford0 -- Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 14:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

New message from Tow
Tow (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Hi a few days ago you pointed out that, actually you have a very good article , I was wondering if youd take a look at WikiJournal_article_nominations ->, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:51, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Ozzie, I'll have a look. PeaBrainC (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

WP:MEDMOS & WP:MEDRS
Thanks for the headsup! I will change to citings accordingly! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frans Undveck (talk • contribs) 10:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Hemothorax
valereee (talk) 00:01, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AVRT ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/AV_nodal_reentrant_tachycardia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/AV_nodal_reentrant_tachycardia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andersen–Tawil syndrome
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andersen–Tawil syndrome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canada Hky -- Canada Hky (talk) 00:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Andersen–Tawil syndrome you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Andersen–Tawil syndrome for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canada Hky -- Canada Hky (talk) 00:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Andersen–Tawil syndrome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andersen–Tawil syndrome for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canada Hky -- Canada Hky (talk) 13:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into your local language via meta

Thanks again :-) --  Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for reviewing the proposals on Alivecor. JerryGraf (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on Wikipedia
Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny Associate Professor Hanyang University If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

"PeaBrainC/Hans Gustav Wilhelm Steinert" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect PeaBrainC/Hans Gustav Wilhelm Steinert and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 16:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages
Hi PBC. In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any Wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.

The WikiJournals of Science and of Medicine (www.wikijsci.org and www.wikijmed.org) couple the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

Note that we do have to publish under real names, so if you don't want your real name associated to your username, you may have to choose atopic that your username has not previously edited.

Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).

All the best - T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 02:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)