User talk:Popefauvexxiii

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! Looks like you've made some good stuff happen here already! I noticed that you moved Diablo to a disambiguation page. However, if you look at the links to Diablo, you'll see that they're almost all game-related, and in fact all of the other Diablos are obscure, dictionary-type definitions, or are likely to be titled differently (Lamborghini Diablo for instance). In such such, you want to let the best-known possibility "own" the unqualified name, and link to the disambigger in a note at the top (see London for an example). Stan 13:30, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

FNORD
Hi! This is Icarus!, being non-Wiki (I'm not logged in...), saying thanx for being an avowed Discordian Wikipedian! Keep it up!24.176.20.60 17:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Untagged images
Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Principiadiscordia pg69.png. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks. Kbh3rd 06:42, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

January 15 Seattle meetup
Just wanted to let you know we are planning another Seattle meetup on January 15, 2005. We're trying to get a sense of who will attend, so please drop by that page & leave a note. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:44, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)

Discordian?
Try the new now with added existance.

User categorization
Greetings, Popefauvexxiii! Please accept this message as an invitation to categorize your user page in the category Category:Wikipedians in Washington and removing your name from the Wikipedians/Washington page. The page will be deleted when all users have been removed. Even if you do not wish to be placed in a category, could you take a moment to remove your name from the Wikipedians/Washington page? Thanks!!

To add your name to the category, please use the tag   to ensure proper sorting.

For more information, please see User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location. -- Roby Wayne  Talk &bull;  Hist 06:56, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:GPK 8a adambomb.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GPK 8a adambomb.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 20:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Shock therapy
Just a quick note to apologise for removing your edit to the ECT article - I should have read the shock therapy article before doing so, as you quite rightly pointed out! Nmg20 22:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, I know how it is when you adopt one of these articles, its easy to get defensive of the product of one's labour, especially in an environment where tinkering is so encouraged. I love the article, btw. --popefauvexxiii 01:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip! I've been looking at the mediation thing a bit already - and suspect you may be correct that a wholesale revert may be the answer... Nmg20 01:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Yo-yo revitalization
Thanks for the heads-up. It is somewhat comforting that the early history and "As weapons" sections had some legitimate sources at some point; I agree with your implication the article is a magnet for silly "you know what I heard?!" information. I believe I have that same book ("Extraordinary Origins of Everyday Things") somewhere; I'll check it out and add more properly-cited info when I can. brain 23:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Austin
I would like some support for the idea. Find out more here. Sahmeditor 16:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

It is now a reality. The page is here. Sa hm  editor  02:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

We have a userbox now! Sa hm  editor  02:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

chill
Running personal commentary on the progress of an article shouldn't be put on someone's talk page.--scuro 11:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hm. No matter how hard i look, i cant find Personal commentary on an article's progress doesn't belong on User talk. Can you point me to the policy guideline to which you refer? --PopeFauveXXIII 17:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NewWorldTranslation blk-hdcovr.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:NewWorldTranslation blk-hdcovr.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians
As you may already be aware, Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians and its subcategories, Category:Discordian Wikipedians, Category:Flying Spaghetti Monsterist Wikipedians, Category:SubGenius Wikipedians, and others, have been deleted. That deletion is now up for review. If you have anything you'd like to say on the subject, now is the time. If you know of any other editors who might have something to say on the subject, pass the word. If, on the other hand, you are not interested in the slightest, feel free to delete this. — Bigwyrm watch mewake me 10:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

I think you might be interested in...
the article pompitous. — The Storm Surfer 11:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

North american union
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on North american union, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because North american union fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''Appears to be a recreation of already deleted article (originally titled North American Union, note caps). Please verify similarity''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting North american union, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, you're saying (regarding the North American Union article) put your redirect back, move the article to my userspace and then somehow apply for a Deletion Review? Wouldn't the current article need to stay in place with the deletion review tag? Hutcher 18:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[[Image:Tournesol.png]]
For secessfully making me think the 1st part of your userpage was actually an articel on something. 68.39.174.238 02:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

32nd degree Masons exist only in Scottish Rite...
and everyone who joins Scottish Rite automatically becomes a 32nd degree Mason. Therefore, to not clarify the statement is incorrect. So what was your reason for reversion? MSJapan 17:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:NARACoverSheet DiscordianSociety.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:NARACoverSheet DiscordianSociety.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 05:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Aus-tex
I didn't know (or had forgotten) that you are in Austin. I lived there from 1988 until 2002 (here is a remnant). I make it back to DFW a few times a year to see the family, but I have yet to return to Austin. I really and truly miss the food (not to mention the pink gorilla). Sounds like it's pretty well-paved by now. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Jehovah's Witnesses, Adherents compared to members
Popefauvexxiii: You have removed information of the number considered adherents of Jehovah's Witnesses. Can you please explain this? The source verifying this information is referenced for all to read. You have removed the information but left the reference. Why have you removed this information, and how do you consider this information as misleading? -- Marvin Shilmer (talk) 19:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Popefauvexxiii: I figured out what happened. On November 16, 2007 editor S7155 changed the statement from what we agreed upon. I had nothing to do with it. In the future, should you take it upon yourself to attribute something to me please make sure I am responsible first. -- Marvin Shilmer (talk) 19:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Awake cover Feb2007.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Awake cover Feb2007.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TheWatchtower cover April1,2006.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:TheWatchtower cover April1,2006.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NewWorldTranslation blk-hdcovr.png
Thanks for uploading Image:NewWorldTranslation blk-hdcovr.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Title change
Request for change in consensus: Change title to "Franklin Coverup Incident"

"A small group of editors can reach a consensual decision, but when the article gains wider attention, others may then disagree. The original group should not block further change on grounds that they already have made a decision. No one person, and no (limited) group of people, can unilaterally declare that community consensus has changed, or that it is fixed and determined."

The existing title is, in the opinion of many who have commented (Gyrofrog, Awfultin, Wayne, Tom1976, Conexion, Apostle 12), fatally biased. To start out saying that the subject material is a "hoax" is indefensible, especially when that point of view is hardly universal. A specially called county grand jury used the word "hoax;" that is all. And there is ample reason to believe that those who comprised the jury had a vested interest in protecting local people.

Request for Comment: Change title to more neutral "Franklin Coverup Incident" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apostle12 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Take Two: Request for change in consensus
Take Two: Request for change in consensus. Change title to "Franklin Child Abuse Allegations"

"A small group of editors can reach a consensual decision, but when the article gains wider attention, others may then disagree. The original group should not block further change on grounds that they already have made a decision. No one person, and no (limited) group of people, can unilaterally declare that community consensus has changed, or that it is fixed and determined."

The existing title "Franklin Coverup Hoax" is, in the opinion of many who have commented (Gyrofrog, Awfultin, Wayne, Tom1976, Conexion, Apostle 12), fatally biased. To start out saying that the subject material is a "hoax" is indefensible, especially when that point of view is hardly universal. A specially called county grand jury used the word "hoax;" that is all. And there is ample reason to believe that those who comprised the jury had a vested interest in protecting local people.

In the previous section, various editors commented on their support for, or opposition to, a name change to "Franklin Coverup Incident." Those who commented over the space of several days included Sherurcij, PopeFauveXXIII, Wayne, Orange Mike, Apostle12, and Rosicrucian.

Orange Mike came up with a suggestion: How about "Franklin Child Abuse Allegations"? Neutral, takes no position regarding "hoax" or "coverup" claims.

I support this newly proposed title change and am asking for additional comments at this time from concerned editors. Apostle12 (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Seal of Austin, TX.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Seal of Austin, TX.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Summa Universalia
I hadn't forgotten about it, every week or two I've been cleaning off a spam edit. I don't think I've been as busy as it sounds like you have been, but my effort to scan more Thornley articles from Factsheet Five definitely went to the back burner. However I do have a new scanner (faster, if not better) so maybe I'll hit it again before long. Good to hear from you! -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (Shhh! "Deacadent Worker," indeed. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC))
 * Speaking of Factsheet Five: I suddenly feel old. I bought this (my first one) twenty years ago, almost to the exact day. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That's great! I hope I get another burst of energy (and time). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 03:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Kerry Wendell Thornley
I noticed you are a significant contributor to the article on Kerry Wendell Thornley. The page presents Kerry Wendell Thornley as though he were a REAL person, when we both know he is a fictional creation of RAW. Glad to see your a fan, I am too, but I dont think the article meets the standard of being either verifiable or encyclopedic. Do you have any evidence he really existed? For that matter, do you have any evidence YOU exist? Rich.lewis (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pomosexual
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pomosexual, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Pomosexual. Thank you. Laytonsmith14 (talk) 09:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Upside-down barnstar
I thought you might enjoy this. I was bored at work, so I decided to play a little with the Upside-down barnstar idea. Hope you like it --W2bh (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:AnimalFarm 1stEd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AnimalFarm 1stEd.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --12:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MattLesko-cropped.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MattLesko-cropped.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Magnus Robot Fighter 4000AD no1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Magnus Robot Fighter 4000AD no1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chillum 05:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Jehovah's Witnesses project
I have started a discussion regarding the content wikipedia has regarding the Jehovah's Witnesses at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses. Seeing that you are listed as a member of that project, I would appreciate any responses to the material there you would like to make. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kerry thornley.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kerry thornley.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Popefauvexxiii gnothiseaton.png
Thanks for uploading File:Popefauvexxiii gnothiseaton.png I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 02:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:PD pg00018.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PD pg00018.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 04:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Timewave_zero
Notice: You commented in an Article for deletion for Timewave zero, an RFC has been opened on whether this article should be replaced with a Redirect. Please comment on the above link. Lumos3 (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:SealOfTheUS Prototype.png
File:SealOfTheUS Prototype.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:SealOfTheUS Prototype.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheWatchtower cover Oct15,1980.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TheWatchtower cover Oct15,1980.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Crisis of Conscience


The article Crisis of Conscience has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability. Notable information already covered at Raymond Franz.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeffro 77 (talk) 10:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Payattentiontoyourselvesandtoalltheflock.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Payattentiontoyourselvesandtoalltheflock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Where'd you get the 1907 Zion's Watch Tower image from?
If it's online, did it come with the rest of the magazine? If you own the magazine, is there anyway you could scan the magazine and upload it online? Thanks!24.125.102.206 (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Popefauvexxiii mysticpath.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Popefauvexxiii mysticpath.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

File:John Rankin Rogers monument.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Rankin Rogers monument.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:18, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Dont call me crazy listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dont call me crazy. Since you had some involvement with the Dont call me crazy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AshFR (talk) 04:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NewWorldTranslation blk-hdcovr.png
 Thanks for uploading File:NewWorldTranslation blk-hdcovr.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Awake cover Feb2007.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Awake cover Feb2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:PrincipiaDiscordia pg00069.png
Thank you for uploading File:PrincipiaDiscordia pg00069.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Discordia roninpresscover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Discordia roninpresscover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:PrincipiaDiscordia IllumiNetCover.png
Thank you for uploading File:PrincipiaDiscordia IllumiNetCover.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PrincipiaDiscordia IllumiNetCover.png
Thanks for uploading File:PrincipiaDiscordia IllumiNetCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vurt JeffNoon UPCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vurt JeffNoon UPCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

File:ATXPortal.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ATXPortal.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GPK 8a adambomb.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GPK 8a adambomb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)