User talk:PsychoticInq

Hampton University
Thank you for your addition; however I feel it is too much weight for what is really a minor incident in the grand scheme of things. As I allude to in my edit summary, please view Virginia Tech and University of Texas - I think you would agree that the shootings at those schools were much more significant, yet they don't have a separate section, or infobox in the middle of an article that is a general overview of a University. Also, please see College_and_university_article_guidelines for more guidance on University articles. Perhaps you can ask that project for guidance on how to best incorporate this content (if at all, I tend to think it doesn't even merit any mention in the Hampton article). --CutOffTies (talk) 02:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Serial killers sentenced in 2010
Category:Serial killers sentenced in 2010, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. LeSnail (talk) 06:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Serial killers sentenced in 2011
Here we go again, see Category:Serial killers sentenced in 2011 Hugo999 (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shadow Hare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meat Cleaver Bank Robber


The article Meat Cleaver Bank Robber has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:PERPETRATOR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 10:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicolas Estemar


The article Nicolas Estemar has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOTNEWS"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Anthony Barnwell
Hello, PsychoticInq,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Anthony Barnwell should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Anthony Barnwell.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Knife-wielding Bank Robbers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knife-wielding Bank Robbers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Knife-wielding Bank Robbers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Nicolas Estemar stabbing spree for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolas Estemar stabbing spree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nicolas Estemar stabbing spree until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 17:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Växjö Arsons for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Växjö Arsons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2015 Växjö Arsons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 17:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Murder of Susan Bezner and Jack Bezner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Susan Bezner and Jack Bezner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Murder of Susan Bezner and Jack Bezner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 17:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Biographies of living persons and other pages in your userspace
Hello PsychoticInq. In accordance with Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, you must not create pages anywhere on Wikipedia, including your own userspace, that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone – such pages may be speedily deleted as attack pages. The importance of this policy cannot be understated, as unsourced or poorly sourced content about living persons can have an effect on their real lives. Persistent violators of the biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing to prevent disruption.

Additionally, please do not rehost pages that were eligible for deletion in the article space in your own userspace, such as blatant hoaxes and content deleted via a deletion discussion. Such userspace pages may also be speedily deleted under the same rationale that led them to be deleted in the mainspace. I have deleted a few pages in your userspace for these reasons. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mz7 (talk) 17:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
--UTRSBot (talk) 07:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I took a quick look through the AFDs of "your" articles. The vast majority of those who !voted to delete were not admins (we don't have "moderators"). The vast majority of those who !voted to keep, were you and your sockpuppets. Also, the vast majority of !voters gave clear, policy-based reasons: your articles didn't give any reasonable and sourced claims of notability (WP:GNG).
 * So your impression that "a moderator could just call their moderator friend to negate my articles if they didn't like them" seems to me to be unmitigated bullshit. —  Wasell ( T ) 12:11, 5 August 2017 (UTC)