User talk:Purin128AL

Whether something is in Mid-Levels or Central
Hi! I saw this comment. I'll check if those schools are in Central or Mid-Levels or both. WhisperToMe (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC) WhisperToMe (talk) 07:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * For Sacred Heart the address is "香港中環堅道26號" and 中環 is Central, but Google Maps labels it as "Mid-Levels". If the SCMP puts it in Mid-Levels I would consider it in both places at once.

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heatherdale railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastlink.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Re; Bus colour coding
Hi there, to answer your question re; bus colour coding. They come from the Public Transport Victoria Local Government Area maps;

https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/more/maps/metropolitan-local-area-maps/

Disambiguation link notification for November 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eastern Express Busway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Freeway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Proposed rail alignment of suburban rail loop.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Proposed rail alignment of suburban rail loop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

edit to national anthem of Hong Kong
"March of the Volunteers" is not the official national anthem of Hong Kong from 1997.

Basic Law and the Law of Hong Kong didn‘t define what song will be the national anthem of Hong Kong from 1997 as Hong Kong is running the “one country two system” rule. This has not be change even China make an amendment to the Annex III of the Basic Law in 2018 & the subseqence implemtn of the national anthem law.

Those law only require Hongkonger respect to the “National Anthem of People Republic of China”, there are no define "March of the Volunteers" will become or is the national anthem of Hong Kong.

Thus, until now, there do not have any offical national anthem of Hong Kong. Please change it back to the correct description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.166.22 (talk) 16:28, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Styx &#38; Stones (talk) 19:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melbourne Airport railway station, Melbourne


A tag has been placed on Melbourne Airport railway station, Melbourne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MB 02:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Melbourne Ferries
I included the other PTV ferry services in the Melbourne network because: ThylacineHunter  (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The Western Port Ferry starts at Stony Point and connects to the Melbourne network.
 * The 2 of the 3 Port Phillip Ferries start at Melbourne in Docklands.
 * Geelong―Melbourne: runs via Portarlington and is the Melbourne―Portarlington + the Portarlington―Geelong ferries in one. The available timetables show only Saturday and Sunday services between 11 March and 23 April run direct Geelong―Melbourne.


 * In line with the vline listing, only transport within metro Melbourne is listed out (or the whole vline network will need to be included)
 * For the Geelong―Melbourne ferry I will simply all into Geelong―Portarlington―Melbourne if that works? And I also I followed the PTV page so I put Melbourne instead of Docklands Purin128AL (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * As the Geelong―Portarlington―Melbourne routes are unlikely to be turned into separate articles I'm happy to display it as one route, although I would maybe swap the order of Melbourne and Geelong to match the route diagrams on Transport in Melbourne and Port Phillip Ferries (which also needs to swap navbox to regional Victoria). -- ThylacineHunter  (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Merge discussion
A current discussion may be of interest to you about merging the Melton railway line article with the Ballarat V/Line rail service article. View the discussion here. HoHo3143 (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Southern Cross Station layout diagram
It is now possible to create a diagram for the layout of Southern Cross Station. I have submitted a request for BSicons for platform numbers needed for this station and there now are a full set for both "A" & "B" so it will be possible to combine the letters with numbers to produce the relevant platform numbers needed (1, 2A-8A, 2B-8B, 8S, 9-14, 15A-16A, 15B-16B). -- ThylacineHunter  (talk) 04:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Although the main reason I haven't done it is because the layout is way too complicated + time consuming and I do not want to leave out any sidings. I'm quite busy with uni work recently so I'll complete the layout for the rest of the network when I have time. Purin128AL (talk) 04:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I was actually unaware you had been doing the line route maps until today and have been updating them as HoHo3143 has been updating the pages to be good articles. I have, at the moment, removed reference in the diagrams to grade separations awaiting further research into how best to display them without making the route maps too confusing or too long. Also whether to just show on the service and not on the physical track. These thing will be clarified by the new section regarding a standard for the diagrams. -- ThylacineHunter  (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I've only been creating track layout diagrams, but not the route ones. I do think level crossings should not be included in the route diagrams, but elevated/trenched sections should be included. Route diagrams should stay simple.
 * So for track diagrams I would include most rail infrastructures: elevated, trench, bridge over rivers/bridges over roads, demolished stations with certain structures stil intact, rail yards/depots, level crossings, intersection with freeways, track gauges, electrification and platforms.
 * For Southern Cross I'm thinking a way to indicate which tracks are electrified, which are not, which are std/dual/broad gauges which might make it very complicated. Purin128AL (talk) 06:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Dual gauge: On my own website, I have been using some of my own versions of the BSicons for track layouts (easiest way I've found to make custom complex layouts). I selected to show dual gauge as a "teal" like set of icons. This is something that we could uses on here. I've also realised there will occasionally be a need for a 2nd colour for narrow gauge as there are some locations on the 2ft 6in Victorian narrow system that also had an interchange with a 2ft or 3ft 'tramway', for these I have currently selected "ochre" although I am open to other suggestions.
 * Elevated/trenched sections: I do agree that they are better suited to Physical track instead of Service diagrams, but there is a potential for the Physical track to cause issues in locations there there is a former railway junction to a closed line originally at ground level that has now been rebuilt as either elevated or lowered track. The Service diagram does not have this potential problem as there are only stations shown.
 * -- ThylacineHunter  (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The only stations without service I included in track layout is only General Motors as it has useable platforms intact, and Pakenham East/East Pakenham whatever it is called as it will be there in 2024. For other grade seperations I've just decided to remove them as they can be seen nowhere from a train. Examples include the new Union station track layout and Pakenham line skyrail where I just update every time a new section is built. Purin128AL (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victorian Tertiary Admissions Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Post-election pendulum for the 2014 Victorian state election moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Post-election pendulum for the 2014 Victorian state election, is not suitable as written to remain published. WP:OSE is not a suitable argument. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 10:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

USI
Hey, hope you are well. I have tagged Unique Student Identifier with notability issues. Please can you address? I was on the fence because it's useful but it does not appear to meet GNG. If tag not addressed, I may need to draft this. Thanks. MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I have added multiple secondary sources that addresses the article and referenced them. Does that address the notability? A few of them are considered from reliable sources as per WP:RSP Purin128AL (talk) 09:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Lines and Services
The use of on Victorian railway station infoboxes is incorrect. is for services, these are different to the lines that the stations are actually on. eg Tarneit railway station, there is no such lines as Geelong or Warrnambool (they are the V/Line services), the line it is on is the Deer Park–West Werribee railway line. While the services aren't supposed to be listed in the lines section, I do think they are more relevant than the actual line names. I would suggest keeping both service and line in that section. -- ThylacineHunter  (talk) 13:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Look great now . -- ThylacineHunter  (talk) 13:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks
Haha sorry for making you revert my stuff, I was doing the redirect class thing on autopilot. Also, thanks for all of your work on railway articles in Australia! Fork99 (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject proposal
Hi, there is currently a proposal for an Australian Transport WikiProject. I thought you may be interested due to your edits and interests in transport in Australia. The proposal can be found at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Australian Transport. If you are interested, add yourself to the Support section of the page. Thank you! Fork99 (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Train station infobox edits are causing Linter errors
Edits like this one are causing Linter errors to appear in articles (click on Page information to see them). Please stop making these edits until you can perform them without causing Linter errors, and revert or fix the edits that you have made so far. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I came here to make the same comment Jonesey95 made. —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Link to discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Reverting edits soon when I have access to a windows computer with AWB. Will discuss at the new WikiProject Council/Proposals/Australian Transport then consider the what amount of information are appropriate in station infoboxes. Purin128AL (talk) 05:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser request
Hey, could you do a small favour for me please (I don’t have AWB yet): could you have a look here (Special:WhatLinksHere/Public transport in Dunedin) and change all of those links to Public transport in the Otago Region? Appreciate it, Fork99 (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Sure no worries I've changed all links now. Purin128AL (talk) 04:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Post-election pendulum for the 2014 Victorian state election
Hello, Purin128AL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Post-election pendulum for the 2014 Victorian state election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Post-election pendulum for the 2014 Victorian state election


Hello, Purin128AL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Post-election pendulum for the 2014 Victorian state election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)