User talk:Qazwsx777

Nomination of Barry Burkhill for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Burkhill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barry Burkhill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kilopylae (talk) 20:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Welcome and introduction
Hi, Qazwsx777. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person by golly! And this real person (that would be me), wants to say welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've made an account! Thanks for joining; you're on your way to making some great contributions.

Because I've noticed you've just joined, I wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. Any questions are fine, nothing is too silly (we've heard them all). Now, the tips below - hop on them - they should help you begin editing. Best of luck! JoeSmack Talk 16:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

P.S. If you just feel like poking around, Help is a good place to start. :)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to James May, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 18:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Suffolk Guild of Ringers


Hello Qazwsx777. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Suffolk Guild of Ringers".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 18:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Date formatting/linking years
Hello. Just an FYI, based on MOS:DATE, dates on British articles should be of the format "14 June 2019", not "the 14th of June 2019". Also, years should not be linked. Cheers, Number   5  7  12:51, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Capitalisation
Hello. When you add a heading like "Notable residents", please make sure the second word is not capitalised. Similarly, people's professions should not be capitalised either.

Also, please don't add people who don't have a Wikipedia article (if they don't have one, they can't be presumed notable), and please just link to them as their article name, rather than adding honorifics etc. Cheers, Number   5  7  11:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Suffolk Task Force
Hi, User:Qazwsx777, have considered joining the Suffolk Task Force? I have been currently working on the Suffolk Electoral Divisions, which I feel could be usefully added to Template:West Suffolk. It would be great if you could take on some of the West Suffolk EDs?Leutha (talk) 10:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, I've created Thingoe North Division, Suffolk Qazwsx777 (talk) 14:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Images at Earl's Court tube station
Hello there! Thank you very much and appreciate the effort that you have added images at Earl's Court tube station. However, we tend to not add too many images into the article haha. The present pictures are fine as it is in my opinion. Thank you though, hope you understand that we try not to clutter the page. Alternatively, readers can access the commons gallery. :D Regards, Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 15:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Talk pages
Hi, Thanks for your adding talk pages to articles like Worthing West (electoral division). When you do this, if you could have a quick look at the page and add a rating, it helps to alleviate the huge backlogs at WikiProjects like the Elections and Referendums project. It's usually fairly clear what sort of state an article is in, but if you're not sure, you can leave it to one of the project's assessors. Thanks and keep up the good work, Gazamp (talk) 11:36, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

External links in prose
Hello Qazwsx. Per WP:EL/WP:ELPOINTS, please don't add external links in prose as you did to esawyer.org.uk here. This link could be added to the article either as a url in a reference, or in the external links section. Cheers, Number   5  7  19:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject banner shell
Be careful with WikiProject banner shell. It's known to have problems with some WikiProject templates some of the time. See Template:WikiProject banner shell. I partially undid a change you made to Talk:List of closed railway stations in Norfolk, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains for the report to WikiProject Trains. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  19:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Singapore
Hey. Thank you for your edit to the Taylor bells list. Had totally forgotten about Lahore and Prune, though they're both unringable. Do you mind if I add that Singapore are the only ringable peal of bells in Asia? Guessing you're a fellow ringer like me :-) Bellminsterboy (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks bellminsterboy. I would say Dove's guide is the arbiter on whether a tower is ringable and it does list Lahore as such. My understanding is that it's religious tensions in the area which prevent the bells from being rung rather than an inherent problem with the installation though I don't think they've got any ropes on them. If they are later marked as unringable on Dove I'd be happy to support the change then.
 * I think 'heaviest' is suitable superlative and given that Taylor's is an operational company we should be careful that the article is written in an objective way otherwise it'll become an advert for their work.
 * Thank you for the work you've done on the article.
 * In time it would be good to have articles on the other notable bell founders namely, Llewellins & James, Watts family, John Briant, Alfred Bowell, Thomas Osborn etc. Qazwsx777 (talk) 11:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey again. Thank you for your comments. As a fellow ringer, and one of fifteen years experience, I quite agree that Dove's Guide are the de facto source. However, as you point out, Lahore have no ropes on them, which does technically make them unringable. I also believe they've not been rung in many decades. I agree re Taylor's list. Good suggestions, though it was William Dobson I was going to start with. Bellminsterboy (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barton Bendish
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Barton Bendish you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 10:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barton Bendish
The article Barton Bendish you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Barton Bendish for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 11:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)