User talk:Rajam6

'''Welcome to my talk page. Please leave all messages in the message section below.''' =Useful Links= How to Use Wikipedia Talk Pages

Messages
rajam (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Thank you for your help. Could you also take a look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Truth_Goodman. Thanks.
 * Sorry, I missed this, but now have addressed it. Nice work.-- SPhilbrick  T  17:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

rajam (talk) 19:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Thank you once again. If you think this is good enough, could you remove the "unreviewed" tag? Thanks.
 * I removed the unreviewed template; however, I'm not familiar with the term "comparatist" so I added a wikilink. Please make sure it goes to the right place.-- SPhilbrick  T  14:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

rajam (talk) 15:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Thank you so much and yes you linked the term "comparatist" to the exact entry in Wikipedia. Thanks a lot for all your help.

The Wagner article is in need of some help
We're in a bit of a pickle in the Wagner discussion page. The issues concerns Social class (sociology) and the phrase supposedly common Germanic past and has now been dismissed by some editors as inconsequential.

At the end of the Wagner discussion page (under Edit War solution topic) there issome suggested courses of action that I was requested to list,  from my point of view. Please help. Just take fast look. Thank you


 * In his own era he furthermore provided the newly emerged middle class with a medium to transfer its familial and political conflicts into a myth of supposedly common Germanic past.
 * (In the introduction, removed as non consequential)


 * Richard Wagner was born into a lower middle class family
 * (In the Biography chapter removed as non consequential)

User:Major Torp (talk) 15:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Adoption request
Hi Rajam6, I notice you've had a request for adoption up for a little while. If you would still like to be adopted, can I suggest that you contact one of the editors on the list of adopters? As Wikipedia is a volunteer project and many adopters are busy, a more pro-active approach would mean that you are more likely to be noticed. If you've got any questions, feel free to leave me a message. WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 14:00, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davinder Singh Daman (June 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Davinder Singh Daman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr Strauss  talk  11:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Davinder Singh Daman concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Davinder Singh Daman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Davinder Singh Daman


Hello, Rajam6. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Davinder Singh Daman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Naeem Ashraf Raja for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naeem Ashraf Raja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Naeem Ashraf Raja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  08:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)