User talk:Rbarton59

After doing some research, I believe we need to tie the history of the Lumbee people to the efforts of the Virginia bureau of vital statistics of the 1920's. The work of Dr. Walter Ashby Plecker, and the newly founded Anglo-Saxon Club of America in had a direct impact on the racial identity of not only the Indians of the tidewater VA area, but some of the ancestors of the Lumbee people who are also from the tidewater VA area. . Racial Integrity Act of 1924. one of the therory is that the Lumbee area decendants from migrating slaves from the Virginia area. The racial act and its implementation clearly shows how the Indians of that area and time were mis-categorized as blacks. Mulatto identity or theory of origin researched by prominent Genealogists Dr.Paul Heinegg and Dr.Virginia E. Demarce have published research on the Lumbee ancestral origins using historic documents,Primary source records, published state records and many types of civil records, proposing that the Lumbee are an politically invented tribe and descend mainly from the mixed race unions of African males and European females referred to as Mulatto. In their book Free African Americans, Heinegg and Demarce have traced the migration of some of the ancestors of the people now calling themselves Lumbee to Robeson County from the Tidewater area of Virginia as individual colonist. Tying these together sheds light no the subject. rick barton 6/5/15

The article Dylan Kage has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dylan Kage[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dylan Kage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yourname (talk) 22:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Yoga do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lumbee External link[edit]

That website (The Center for Lumbee Studies) you keep inserting as a WP:EL maybe be appropriate for the Lumbee article, but is not for the other pages you have added it to. Please do not WP:SPAM this link onto other inappropriate pages. Thanks, He iro 21:17, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A thread has been started here Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard#The Center for Lumbee Studies concerning this link if you wish to comment. He iro 21:40, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Online dating service. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rbarton59 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

was unaware of all the policy of editing. have read the policy and will follow it to the t. Rbarton59 (talk) 3:10 pm, 20 March 2014, last Thursday (2 days ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

It seems you understand the problematic behavior, and your agreement to desist and edit constructively appears credible. - Vianello (Talk) 07:12, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If unblocked, what do you intend to edit, if you can't insert promotional links into articles? Can you show me an edit you'd like to make to an article that would substantially improve it? SQL ^{Query me!} 06:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to stay away from inserting anytype of links. My major focus is Lumbee Indians and their battle for federal recognition. Currently there are at least two sets of thought regarding the Lumbee Indians and their ancestry. One is that the Lumbee area desendants from migrating slaves from the Virginia area. the other is that the Lumbees are the remnants of several small Indian tribes alone the Lumber river. I plan on reseaching and providing support for the theory that has the best documentation.Rbarton59 (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Your addition to List of Lumbees has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]