User talk:Redjar

As the first editor of the various Rutland pages, I just wanted to say thanks for the maps! BCorr ¤ &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 22:01, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)

--

Nice photo of the Amtrak train! Thanks! Out of curiousity, where is it that's so snowy this time of year? Moncrief 01:12, Mar 19, 2004 (UTC)

Chicago
Because of your work with the WikiProject Cities I'd like you to take a look at the Chicago article if you have the time & desire. It is currently up for Peer Review (see Chicago Talk) and I would enjoy hearing your feedback to help guide the growth of this article. Jasenlee 01:10, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

Town maps!
I noticed that you were creating town maps for Vemont towns. I recently started a personal project to create maps with dots indicating the location of towns (I just finished my home state of North Carolina and have started on Alabama, see User:Seth Ilys). We might want to coordinate these efforts on WikiProject Cities, if you're interested... -- Seth Ilys 16:59, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Just a note, about your picture Image:Knitting.jpg, it has been replaced by a painting, also very nice, but maybe you wanted to know this. Ellywa 04:58, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Might you please consider adding yourself to Wikipedians/Cartographers - Gaz 13:39, 10 May 2004 (UTC)

I posted this over in Talk:Middlebury (town), Vermont, but I was just wondering why you changed Middlebury,_Vermont to redirect to Middlebury (town), Vermont as opposed to the other way around? All of the other Vermont towns are TownName,_Vermont. Adamfranco 14:49, 14 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Adam, I've answered your question on the Talk:Middlebury (town), Vermont page. - Redjar 13:55, 15 May 2004 (UTC)

Whats wrong with adding the official apple photos?
 * Llhm take a look at your talk page. I've provided links to copyright information.  The images you've uploaded are copyrighted and you gave no indication that you had received permission to use the images under the GFDL or compatible license.  - Redjar 12:58, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Requested pictures
Hi. I am working on your capital image requests. All cities now have a location map. I also took the liberty of changing the request on Requested pictures from a table into a regular list. Happy editing -- Chris 73 Talk 08:29, Oct 23, 2004 (UTC)


 * Hey Chris 73. Thanks a ton for helping out with the U.S. state capital pages. Everything looks great. - Redjar 04:17, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

The Dot Project
I don't think I've ever mentioned this to you, but the source county images for the dot-project have all been multi-licensed by James F. and Wapcaplet into the CC-by license. I am asking all of the dot-project contributors to multi-license their dot-project images under this license as well, which just requires simple permission. Would you be agreeable to doing this? I will use the rambot to update the copyright tags in the same way that it updated the tags in the source county images. Thanks! – Ram-Man (comment) (talk)  21:31, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)

Unverified image
Thanks for uploading the image I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.)  Thanks, Kbh3rd 03:48, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Image:Knitting needles.jpg

Image recreation requests
Greetings. I just started the Image recreation requests project, and I thought you might be interested. Your help would be greatly appreciated. (I got your name from the list at Wikipedians/Cartographers.) Best regards, – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 03:20, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

GFDL
My understanding is that all works (text and images) contributed to Wikipedia by a user are automatically released under the GFDL, or into the public domain if the user prefers. You may duel-license your contributions under another license (Creative Commons) as long as you give anyone the right to use your contributions under either license (not require both). The rationale in some situations we may want to use materials under the GFDL (publishing a print version of Wikipedia) and in other situations we may want to use materials under a different license (distributing a single image). If you're still unsure, ask on IRC or the village pump. Warmest regards, Neutralitytalk 23:56, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright
Hello! I came across Fair Haven Vermont 20040701.jpg, and noticed it was untagged, but didn't want to presume by adding a copyright tag to it. Is it one of yours, GFDL or cc-by-2.0 or whichever? grendel|khan 20:47, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)


 * Ah, excellent. Thank you! grendel|khan 16:13, 2005 Apr 22 (UTC)

Copyrighted iPhoto screenshot
I noticed you tagged an iPhoto screenshot you made as copyrighted by you. I have removed this tag beacuse you do not own the copyright to the iPhoto software (Apple does). Likewise you cannot release screenshots under I suppose you could copyright the images used in the iPhoto screenshot though... --Ctachme 22:58, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User categorization
Greetings! Your user page hasn't been vandalized :-) --it was updated to use the new User Categorization scheme. I have categorized your User Page as a Wikipedian in Vermont (Category:Wikipedians in Vermont) since your name was listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Vermont page.  The Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Vermont page is scheduled for deletion.  Thanks!   Roby Wayne  Talk &bull;  Hist 00:11, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Your photos
Just leaving a note of thanks for all the photos you've uploaded, especially the ones of famous people, as we rarely have copyleft images of them. I was wondering where we'd gotten the photo of Robert Pinsky and was delighted to see it was a regular contributor. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 22:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Bougereau Gallery
You have edited the William-Adolphe Bouguereau gallery. It has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with What Wikipedia is not. The deletion discussion is here. A proposal to modify the policy is here. Please join either or both discussions and comment as you see fit. Dsmdgold 16:10, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

*Book images
I've uploaded two of your pictures from Flickr to the Commons, since they're both superior to what we presently have. They're Image:PowerBook redjar.jpg and Image:iBook redjar.jpg, maybe you want to add them to your gallery ;) -- grm_wnr Esc  20:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Great Work
Keep up the good work! Your photos are fantastic. Thanks. \

Taichung City
I am new on WikiProject Cities. I have added considerable content to the first city I am working on, which happens to be the city of my residence, Taichung City. Would you mind taking a few minutes to look it over and leave comments on how you think I can make it better to bring it up to WikiProject Cities standards in a section of the discussion page for the city’s article page that I have set up.

Thank you. Ludahai 03:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Walmart exterior.jpg
Hello, just thought I'd let you know that your image is being used on. Regards, Tuxide 23:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Topographic map example.png
Could you please provide the scale (graphically) of this map? And some indication of north; presumably "up"? --Belg4mit 14:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

This American Life
Hey. Thanks for all of your work on the This American Life list and others. I also am curious... at the end of the podcast for #333: The Center For Lessons Learned there is a girl from Baghdad who has a Myspace account they interviewed. I've read things like http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/ ocassionally but they are all more political... I was curious to see what her writings were like. If you happen to know, otherwise, just thanks. gren グレン 09:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mike Pinkerton
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mike Pinkerton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Mike Pinkerton. Thank you. -- mms 00:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Church_st_burlington_vt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Church_st_burlington_vt.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 00:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Johnson, Vermont to Johnson (town), Vermont
Hi Redjar, I am curious about why you mived the article Johnson, Vermont. CApitol3 15:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Apple address book v3.1.1.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Apple address book v3.1.1.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Van de graaff generator sm.jpg
Noticed that an image credited to you, Image:Van de graaff generator sm.jpg on Wikimedia Commons had a copyright tag on it. Since it wasn't uploaded by you, I thought you might like to know, in case it was used illegaly. Cheers -- Chetvorno TALK 11:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Knitting needles
Hi Jason! :)

I'm trying to organize all the knitting images on the Commons and I noticed your nice knitting needle image here. Would you mind moving it to the Commons and categorizing it under "Category:Knitting needles and tools"? Thanks muchly and happy New Year, Willow (talk) 16:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Aperture diagram.png
A tag has been placed on Image:Aperture diagram.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 02:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:South burlington vt highlig.png
Image:South burlington vt highlig.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:South burlington vt highlight.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * File:Spider web 20040725.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Spider web 20040725.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Eagle Lake Adirondacks New York.jpg
Hi, Jared. Urban has uploaded this image and attributed it to you, releasing it as GFDL. I noticed that you have only uploaded select photos from your collection to Wikipedia and Commons (as well as some on Flickr). It could be possible that you do not intend to release this Eagle Lake image. However, if you do, please update the image's license accordingly, and drop a note at Featured article candidates/State Route 74 (New York – Vermont). Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 01:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD on Euclid D. Farnham
An article that you may have an opinion on, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Euclid D. Farnham. This is not to solicit a vote either way, but I would value your input. Thank you. Mickmaguire (talk) 16:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Focal length.png
Thanks for uploading File:Focal length.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 05:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Meeting house marlboro vermont 20040911.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Meeting house marlboro vermont 20040911.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Meeting house marlboro vermont 20040911.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Meeting house marlboro vermont 20040911.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Peter clavelle 20041012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Peter clavelle 20041012.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 16:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Peter clavelle 20041012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Peter clavelle 20041012.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 16:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Ben jerry plant waterbury sm.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ben jerry plant waterbury sm.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 05:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Montpelier vt state house sm.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Montpelier vt state house sm.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 05:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Morristown vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Morristown vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:20, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Yarn sm.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yarn sm.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Montpelier vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Montpelier vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Hartland vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hartland vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Guilford vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Guilford vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Vernon vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vernon vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Shaftsbury vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shaftsbury vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Greensboro vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Greensboro vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Killington vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Killington vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Waterbury vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waterbury vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Hyde park vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hyde park vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Addison vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Addison vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Brattleboro vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brattleboro vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 22:04, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Athens vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Athens vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 22:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Averill vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Averill vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 22:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Bakersfield vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bakersfield vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 22:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Marlboro vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marlboro vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 22:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:St johnsbury hilight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:St johnsbury hilight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 22:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Williston vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Williston vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 22:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Hartford vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hartford vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 22:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Norwich vt highlight sm.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Norwich vt highlight sm.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. MGA73 (talk) 20:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 01:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Bristol vermont main street.jpg needs authorship information
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Bristol vermont main street.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposal to shut down WP Geographic Coordinates & ban coordinates on wikipedia articles
This means you. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Quicktake 200 back sm.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Quicktake 200 back sm.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 00:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Michael powell politician.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Michael powell politician.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:05, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Vermont 251 Club for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vermont 251 Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vermont 251 Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edison (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Johnson, Vermont listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Johnson, Vermont. Since you had some involvement with the Johnson, Vermont redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)