User talk:Reego41

Image tagging for File:Unknown (9).png
Thanks for uploading File:Unknown (9).png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Unknown (9).png
Thanks for uploading File:Unknown (9).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kula (volcano), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kula. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Reego41! Your additions to 1956 Budapest earthquake have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Daikoku Seamount
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of West Mata
The article West Mata you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:West Mata and Talk:West Mata/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of West Mata
The article West Mata you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:West Mata for comments about the article, and Talk:West Mata/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in The Core Contest
 I, Festucalex, invite you to participate in The Core Contest. Each participant improves one vital or core article during a ≈45 day period, with monetary rewards at stake! This is an excellent opportunity to make a "bang-for-your-buck" improvement to Wikipedia through a burst of focused effort that will be felt most by the casual user. See a fuller explanation. Hurry up and reserve an article now! 07:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC) To invite other editors, place the following on their talk page: ==Invitation to participate in The Core Contest==

DYK for West Mata
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daikoku Seamount
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daikoku Seamount you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jo-Jo Eumerus -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Noting that I did reply to one of your changes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm aware, I just don't have time currently. ' Reego 41 ' 10:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daikoku Seamount
The article Daikoku Seamount you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Daikoku Seamount for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jo-Jo Eumerus -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1986 João Câmara earthquake
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1986 João Câmara earthquake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1986 João Câmara earthquake
The article 1986 João Câmara earthquake you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1986 João Câmara earthquake and Talk:1986 João Câmara earthquake/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 13:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1986 João Câmara earthquake
The article 1986 João Câmara earthquake you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1986 João Câmara earthquake for comments about the article, and Talk:1986 João Câmara earthquake/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Tendürek
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mount Tendürek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, a human here. The article is almost ready for GA, just a few needed fixes. There's no quid pro quo at GAN, but of course I'd be delighted if you picked one of my GAN articles to review . Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Tendürek
The article Mount Tendürek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mount Tendürek for comments about the article, and Talk:Mount Tendürek/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)