User talk:Regan123

User:Stavros1 and Norfolk roads problem
I refer to A148 road and A149 road: I notice you tagged one or both of the articles with the essay-like template; however the user in question has persisted in removing them when I have attempted to restore them to the article. I believe they are correctly used, as I do not think information in such elaborate prose form is conducive to an effective encyclopedia entry. He is very much risking a wp:3rr if he continues (and probably has violated it by now, anyway). Are you able assist/advise? I have written to him on his talk page, but he has merely deleted my comment and not provided a response. I can understand his frustration, but his behaviour is not in the spirit of the whole Wikipedia project. I personally believe he is being possessive of these articles (being from Norfolk) and immature with his "don't agree with your opinion so I'll ignore it" attitude. This is really beginning to wind me up, to be honest, but I'm trying to be calm and approaching this from a pragmatic view. I've flown off the handle in the past, and have got burnt, so I don't want to do anything silly now. But I can't see a way through: he will clearly not listen, but I'm pretty certain his views are not in keeping with the overall wikipedia ethos, so therefore something needs to happen. — MapsMan  [  talk  |  cont  ] — 16:28, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Questionnaire
In an effort to assess the progress of Wikiproject Cheshire, it has been decided to send a questionnaire to members. To answer, please copy this questionnaire and paste your answers on the answer page. While participation is, of course, not compulsory, thoughtful answers will help the project to develop and improve. Thank you.


 * 1. The project is always looking for new members, so we want to find out which ways of attracting and approaching potential members work best. Do you remember how and why you joined?
 * Answer:


 * 2. How would you describe your involvement in the project? What activities do you undertake and how often do you edit Cheshire-related article?
 * Answer:


 * 3. Do you feel like you receive adequate support/contact from project members?
 * Answer:


 * 4. The project talk page is intended to be the hub of the project, where members discuss articles and help each other improving them. Until very recently it has been almost inactive, but do you check the project talk page?
 * Answer:


 * 4a. If the talk page was more active, would you get involved in discussions there?
 * Answer:


 * 5. When viewing Cheshire-related articles, are there any issues that have stood out as needing attention or frustrated you? (Traditional counties POV, poor coverage about a particular subject, vandalism going unnoticed etc)
 * Answer:


 * 6. Maintaining the Cheshire portal is one of the Cheshire WikiProject's main aims, providing a display of the best and most up to date articles that are part of the project. There is currently a drive to promote it to featured status, but input from a wide range of members is needed. Do you have the portal on your watchlist?
 * Answer:


 * 7. Would you be interesting in subscribing to a newsletter covering North West England, with details of work done by WikiProjects representing Cheshire, Greater Manchester, and Merseyside?
 * Answer:


 * 8. Finally, are there any improvements or initiatives you'd like to see WP:CHES undertake, or general comments you'd like to make?
 * Answer:

Nomination of Westbury Park, Staffordshire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Westbury Park, Staffordshire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Westbury Park, Staffordshire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Crystal Palace, London


A tag has been placed on Category:People from Crystal Palace, London indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of A2199 road for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A2199 road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/A2199 road& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 21:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)