User talk:Romfordian

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Simply south 10:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

helpme

References and Sources
Is there any guidance in Wikipedia on when to directly reference a statement, and when to include fact(s) and give a general "Source" listing.

My current practice is to directly include a "Reference" to anything that may be questioned, is counter-intuitive, or is an opinion directly attibutable to a particular person, document or publication, otherwise to give a "Source".

Romfordian 09:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Citing sources should be what you're looking for. KTC 09:56, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict)Thats pretty much it, also you don't always have to link references to statements in the article, so wp:cite for more info.-- Kerotan Leave Me a Message  Have  a nice day :) 09:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Preserving original units
Hello Romfordian, thank you for your extensive recent edits to several rail-related articles; switching the infobox contents to use auto convert macros. For the moment I have temporarilly reverted your changes to the British Rail Class 59, British Rail Class 66 and British Rail Class 67 articles. I noticed that several of these edits had removed a previously accurate figure and replaced it with an inaccurate approximation in another unit base (mostly replacement of metric with imperial).

I do believe that the Template:Convert macros are an excellent improvement and I would be keen to see you re-add your changes in a way that preserves the current values contained in the article as the primary units. The converted approximation from the macro should be the one shown in (brackets). We can remember what happened with the Mars Surveyor '98 program after a double conversion between metric, imperial and back again with rounding at each stage!

Once again, my appreciations for your enthusiasm and I look forwarding to see a variation on your previous edits re-added. Thank you. —Sladen (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Sladen. Not really surprised that someone reverted these but really appreciate you letting me know the reason :) It's a toss-up between consistency across the piece and usage of what was/is current at the time of order/delivery (I'm guessing that from the 59 onwards, the specs were in metric). I'm happy to re-do with an autoconvert from metric to imperial where I can - although I'll have to write a specific kN-lbf template to go with the lbf-kN that I wrote for the older diesels. However, I'm tempted to keep to mph(km/h) as actual rail speeds will be in mph, and I'm guessing that the locos have speedos in mph. Also, I can't get excited about the odd mm in (say) the length of the loco - get a bit of dust on the buffer shafts, compress them a few times and ..... Romfordian (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Any standard for consistency would be to metric, with an exception for other original or specified units. Manual of Style (dates and numbers) is basically this (actually, a little stronger) with the exceptions for US and UK (to a lesser degree).  The example given being speed-limits in mph, just as you noted.
 * Are the additional templates necessary (other than feet'+inches"→metres), could Template:convert be used directly... this would keep things in the source code of the infoboxes aligned and easier to follow when editing. The main reason I did the temporary revert was data integrity—ensuring values didn't get disrupted by Chinese Whispers.
 * I suspect the break-point for widespread metric use in specifications is going to fall around the mid-1980s about at ~Class 58/Class 60/Class 89. Class 91/92 have rated metric speed limits.  Roughly I'd just follow wants in the infobox already as the primary unit, the multiple-of-ten/hundred/thousand is probably going to be primary unit (so a 3,000 bhp engine probably still is that...   For the EMD 59/66/67 I would suspect these are metric with imperial-engines, but that's just a hunch.  Does that help refine some sort of guiding-line?  —Sladen (talk) 15:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * NB. I also reverted British Rail Class 58 for the moment; 44inch wheels sounds suspiciously like 1.1m   —Sladen (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * For Long Tons/Tonnes, I'd probably consider doing the conversion x LT (y T), but not the other way, if the original is metric, just x Tonnes... The values are fairly similar and the Loooooony Tonnnnnnnns seems to add lots of noise to me. —Sladen (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Upminster windmill
I see you've been expanding the article. Can you provide a reference for the last statement in the Steam engine section? Is it the Upminster Windmill book? Mjroots (talk) 11:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Hydrology and geology
HI, just saw your additions to the River Fowey article - good stuff, thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 23:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Acer in snow April 2008.jpg and File:Phyllostachys_Nigra_in_the_snow_April_2008.jpg
Hello Romfordian,

Assuming your Wikimedia Commons username is the same as your username here on the English Wikipedia, I think you were the original photographer and uploader of the two above files? Apologies if it wasn't you - feel free to correct me if so!

The above files are currently residing in the "Unidentified locations in London" category over on Commons. If at all possible, as part of a general clear-out of that category, I'd very much like to recategorise them down to at least town level. So, if you could confirm for example that those photos were taken in Romford, I could then recategorise them in a more specific category such as "Private gardens in Romford". Of course with it being a private garden we would certainly not need to be any more specific than that, but it would be very helpful if we could at least remove them from the top-level "Unidentified locations in London" category. Otherwise they'd probably stay in that unidentified cat indefinitely, given that there's no other apparent clues in the photos as to where they were taken. In any case, thanks very much in advance for any possible help. Best Regards, Rept0n1x (talk) 19:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I also forgot to mention, if you'd rather not say where these photos were taken, that's completely fine - please let us know if so. In that case, we simply tag them with the "Location withheld" template on Commons, that then would allow us to remove them from the "Unidentified locations in London" category. In any case, thanks for any possible reply, Regards Rept0n1x (talk) 20:22, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atlantic Coast Express, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Launceston and Seaton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Page numbers
Hi, when writing references that use cite templates, and a single page is the source of the information, please use the page parameter - the pages parameter is for where multiple pages from the source are used, as in 12, 34 or 12–14. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Travelling Post Office, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penrith ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Travelling_Post_Office check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Travelling_Post_Office?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of British Rail Class 87 locomotives


The article List of British Rail Class 87 locomotives has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:CBWPS logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:CBWPS logo.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Doctor ian c allen moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Doctor ian c allen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 20:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr Ian C Allen


A tag has been placed on Dr Ian C Allen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 20:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GWR 1366 Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dart Valley Railway ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/GWR_1366_Class check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/GWR_1366_Class?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Ian C. Allen concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ian C. Allen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Ian C. Allen concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ian C. Allen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ian C. Allen


Hello, Romfordian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ian C. Allen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romford railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liverpool Street.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Cornish China Clay Branches
In Draft:Cornish China Clay Branches there are a number of references to "Mitchell 2006", but no such work is defined. DuncanHill (talk) 11:17, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi DuncanHill. You're right!. Now corrected to "Mitchell 1994". Romfordian (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornish China Clay Branches has been accepted
 Cornish China Clay Branches, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Cornish_China_Clay_Branches help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ~Kvng (talk) 20:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Padstow
 * added a link pointing to Falmouth
 * River Camel
 * added a link pointing to Falmouth

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:British Rail departmental wagons
Hello, Romfordian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:British Rail departmental wagons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:British Rail departmental wagons


Hello, Romfordian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "British Rail departmental wagons".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Doncaster Works
 * added links pointing to Great Northern Railway and LNER
 * Holgate Road carriage works, York
 * added a link pointing to Flying Scotsman

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romford–Upminster line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grays.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)