User talk:Sadaryohan

September 2016
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Khandayat, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 05:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 06:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karan (caste), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Karan (caste) was changed by Sadaryohan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872557 on 2016-09-13T06:14:12+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:14, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Khandayat. Jim1138 (talk) 07:31, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Your recent editing history at Khandayat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 16:20, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khandayat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suryavanshi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Invitation
Pratyush (talk) 10:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:45, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Block reason
Two checkusers (that is, users with access to the technical details to determine this) have confirmed you've used multiple accounts. Your most recent unblock doesn't address this at all. I strongly urge you remove your current unblock request and consider how to move forward, knowing that we know you've abused multiple accounts. You are in danger of having your talk page access revoked based on your current approach. --Yamla (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Yamla with due respect, how have I abused it. there is nothing wrong with using multiple accounts unless it is falsely supporting someone or vandalizing pages. I have edited and referenced my edits (based on the sock puppetry page). I have not insulted anyone, nor have I created any edits without due discussion. I have never used any x-rated material or vandalize any work, only edited with using citations. I have clearly cited my edits. Hence, what would be my next procedure for unblocking or further helping Wikipedia on an informative manner. Thank you Sadaryohan (talk) 03:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Kshatriya odia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kshatriya odia. Since you had some involvement with the Kshatriya odia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sitush (talk) 22:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Khandayat dynasties and states


The article List of Khandayat dynasties and states has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * None of the sources mention that these were Khandayat dynasties / states. Creator blocked for sockpuppetry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. utcursch &#124; talk 23:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)