User talk:SailedtheSeas

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi SailedtheSeas! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 03:38, Thursday, May 21, 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Mikethewhistle-original. Thank you. KyleJoan talk 17:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Re:Email
Please read Guide to appealing blocks. You can add to your talk page, replacing "your reason here" with why you should be unblocked. Your other option is Unblock Ticket Request System. Sro23 (talk) 20:21, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

I am not a sickpuppet
Addtl - The sole piece of evidence KJ stated is that another user and myself had an interest in ONE page. If I were this other user, would there not have been greater overlap? SRO23 you say there is like writing style, can you please give me an example? The so called wikistalking is compromised of one talk page and a question about another page with no interaction on said page or talk page. If I were wikistalking, would there not been more overlap? SailedtheSeas (talk) 21:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Writing style examples: "Addtl" instead of "Additional", "#" instead of "Number" (Special:Diff/946597333, ), "KJ" instead of "KyleJoan" , lowercase "i" instead of uppercase (inconsistently) , and overall inconsistent grammar and punctuation, and same sort of rambling-style of writing. There's also the teahouse discussions as explained on the SPI. Regardless of whether the SPI was retaliatory, it was not baseless. The fact that this new user, created two days after the last socks were blocked, out of nowhere starts following KyleJoan around, opposing their RFCs and filing a SPI on them, is just too much for it to be a coincidence. Overlap in articles is not the only evidence that can be taken into account when determining sockpuppetry. I'm not opposed CU being run either, though "innocence" checks are usually rejected, and all Mikethewhistle-original socks appear to be stale (there might still be data on them stored somewhere, I'm not sure how it works). Sro23 (talk) 21:50, 12 December 2020 (UTC)