User talk:Sammi Brie/Archive 29

DYK for WKAB-TV
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Telefe Mar del Plata
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KCEE
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KPHN
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Rocky Mountain PBS
Thanks for creating the article on KRMZ. Now could you create an article for KTSC in Pueblo? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hello :)

Tatupiplu'talk 11:01, 24 January 2021 (UTC) 

A Barnstar!

 * Thank you ! It's not a DYK, but I recently did a near-3x expansion of an existing GA closer to you, WCSP-FM. It didn't have a lot of info about the early years of the station, so I set out to rectify it and bring it to the standard of other GAs and near-GAs I've written. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 20:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That's some really good work! :) You ever have a spare couple moments, go nuts on WAIW.  Dates back to 1946 and is connected to WINC (AM).  WINC-AM was my undertaking.  Took it from a start to C, to GA, and the only radio station FA (total brag). :D  I don't have the energy to do the same with WAIW (the former WINC-FM).


 * I miss the old "Jazz90", it was a good little station when it was WDCU. WPFW got their entire Jazz library with the sale, so that moved there, but Jazz had a 24-hour home at 90.1 and it sucked to lose that to C-SPAN.  You only get occasional Jazz mixed in with the Pacifica shows on WPFW, which is fine, but when you wanna hear Jazz...you wanna hear Jazz.  Unfortunately, out my way, neither matters much anymore.  WPFW gets wiped out by heavy bleed over from an over-modulated WHFW (yeah, two frequencies away), while WCSP is completely covered now by WVRS.  Luckily, there is Jazz24 from KNKX in Seattle...and they stream online. :) -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 20:31 on January 25, 2021 (UTC)


 * I have yet to scout out Virginia this year, but as always my ability to write articles that I like is really dependent on paper coverage. I got really lucky with KRMZ since Colorado's state historical newspaper collection had 1980s and 1990s Steamboat Pilot records, which dropped the surprise that the original KSBS-TV was an independent local station before going Telemundo! Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 20:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sadly, The Winchester Star (earlier The Winchester Evening Star) stinks for online articles. The Library of Virginia probably have their archives like all state libraries do, I just don't have access.  I just go to the library (5 miles away in Winchester) and get the hard copy of the WINC-AM/FM file. :)  This, though, is my all time favorite radio station history site.  It's not newspapers, but it sure comes close.  Back in the 40s, 50s, 60s, even into the 70s, the magazines and almanacs really documented EVERYTHING that went on.  Someone sneezed, they recorded it and it got published.


 * But, if you have access to the Library of Colorado, then you will probably have access to the Library of Virginia. Up to a certain point, you will be able to search The Northern Virginia Daily for more related articles on WINC-FM (now WAIW) and you can, of course, cross-reference what I have on the WINC (AM) article.  It's nothing you have to do today, just when you get time.  Trust me, neither of those stations are going anywhere.  WAIW just got sold to EMF and WINC-AM is the Beck/Rush/Hannity/Levin news/talker for the area.  Those two will still be on the air when everyone else has signed off. :D -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:11 on January 26, 2021 (UTC)


 * It's rare that state collections have papers in the years I need for radio work, though I see there are a few years (spotty record) from NewspaperArchive. I might have to look into this one. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 02:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I would not rule it out. :) They have newspapers, in Virginia, dating back to 1736.  If it exists, we kept it.  Other states and other countries too. :D  That part is new.  They didn't have that last time I looked.  I believe Library of Virginia (LoV) is connected with the Library of Congress (LoC), since it all started here. :)  You register here at the top of the screen.  Since it's a library, it's probably free or stupid cheap.  Usually if you have a library card in one location, it carries over nationwide. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 03:56 on January 26, 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WUNA
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WEMY
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KRMZ
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KRZY (AM)
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WFMZ-TV (channel 67)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK help needed
There is currently a shortage of DYK prep set builders and it is difficult to keep up with the rate required. Producing a balanced set is quite an interesting task. I am not able to both build prep sets and move sets into the queue. As a regular DYK contributor, have you considered promoting hooks to prep? It's not difficult, and there are tips on promoting hooks here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Didn't know that could be done by non-admins/people that weren't specifically designated. I might be a bit busy with some other responsibilities but I will consider this. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KACY (TV)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Re: Template:Infobox television station
You added the ATSC 3.0 field without first seeking consensus? Where do I see an example? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Working on this tonight. It's a flag that adds a little box to the top, and I also plan a category separate from the infobox. For a demonstration, look at KWGN-TV — I've put that page live with a new ATSC 3.0 category, an extra column on the subchannels table listing host stations for each sub, and the new top label. And yes, atsc3 and above can be used together. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 03:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, one more thing! "PSIP" is only extant in ATSC 1.0, so while I'm already an evangelist for dropping (PSIP) from these infoboxes, it's probably even better to do with stations involved in an ATSC 3.0 arrangement. FYI, ATSC 3.0 permits services to have major channel numbers that are three digits, and per a perusal of SiliconDust's forums, most ATSC 3.0 test stations do this by simulcasting channel 7.1 on 107.1 and so on. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 04:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KSUB
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KXBN
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

KTOY DYK SNAFU FYI
Hello! Your submission of KTOY at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --GRuban (talk) 17:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Good article backlog drive in March
In order to receive notifications about future drives, sign up for the Good articles newsletter. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Biotin DYK
Will you be returning to finish this DYK review? David notMD (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. FYI - This is my seventh vitamin raised to GA. Six to go. I dread trying to tackle Vitamin D, which is currently the most contentious (possible COVID benefit). I might finish the water solubles before attempting the remaining fat solubles (E, A and D). A will be a reunion, as that was my doctoral thesis topic back in late 1970s. David notMD (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WCBR
M AN d ARAX •  XAЯA b ИA M  00:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KASW-2006Improved.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KASW-2006Improved.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KBQS-LP
Hey Sammi, would you have any qualms with me mentioning this on the WPRS talk page? I know we have differing opinions on this, but we want the same thing for the article, just different ways of going about it. :) I would like to get more opinions/!votes since it has been relisted.  I don't think it would hurt if it came from our people (ie: WPRS).  Since you are the OP, I thought I'd let you decide.  Hope your day is going well. :) -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:12 on February 28, 2021 (UTC)
 * It might not hurt. Even though we have article alerts, the complexity of this discussion could use more topic editors. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 02:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Okie Dokie, I will write something small up and post it posthaste. Feel free to edit it if you feel like. :) -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:18 on February 28, 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Radio Stations -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 02:23 on February 28, 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
 * Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
 * 🇷🇼 Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
 * Flag of the United Nations.svg Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
 * 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
 * Standard of Oliver Cromwell (1653–1659).svg Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
 * Bennington Flag.svg Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
 * 🇺🇸 Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

WFOS
Here's another source for you to use for the WFOS article. First paragraph under "Station Sales". Keep up the EXCELLENT work! :) Well done! :) -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:12 on March 21, 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, and do check out vartv.com and their archives for more on WFOS. They have a TON on Hampton Roads are radio and television news.  Excellent and highly reliable source.  That's where RadioInsight gets his Hampton Roads and Richmond news from. :) -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:14 on March 21, 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KMSM-FM
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KTOY
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Progressive Social Networks
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WPDF-LP
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

KBQS-LP
Since it looks like the KBQS-LP page will be deleted, I have started a new article (free of the hoax edits) in my sandbox (you can find it here). I would like your help, since you are so insanely good at finding information. I'm going to ping and  in on this one as well. Now, even thought it's in my userspace, please feel free to edit at will. Go crazy. :) Also, please feel free to ping/bring in whoever you like as well. :)  Have fun! -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 03:19 on March 7, 2021 (UTC)
 * If I had found something—anything!—I would have put it in the article and averted this scenario altogether. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 03:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I figured you would have. :) I didn't know if you were trying to avoid the hoax edits as well. :) -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 03:26 on March 7, 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, let me ask you this. As is right now, the version I have in my sandbox, what do you think?  Think it would stand up to scrutiny? -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 03:36 on March 7, 2021 (UTC)
 * (lurking) I do think it stands up myself, though instead of using the subject's name, I would instead list it as 'a woman in San Francisco falsely representing herself as part of the station and holding an FCC email address' or something of that matter. That might just be me who really hates someone getting their name undeservedly in an article, though.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I can do that to. Cause she technically uses more than one name (actually 3 or 4), so I could knock it down to "On four separate occasions, in early 2019 and late 2020, beginning on February 16, a woman, completely unassociated Sacramento Bicycle Kitchen and KBQS-LP, claiming to be from the San Francisco area and using a false identity, filed applications regarding the station, making many outlandish and patently false claims."  That might have to be trimmed or cut into two or three seperate sentences. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 23:02 on March 7, 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm still unconvinced this is worth our time or has reliable sources. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 00:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't mind letting it sit in my sandbox for awhile until new references come along. :) But, I like Nate's idea to limit "Kaylee's" "presence" in the article.  I just need a little help with the sentence structure.  Then, it can sit for however long.  It's not like Wikipedia not I am going anywhere anytime soon. *is promptly hit by a bus* -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 03:59 on March 8, 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with that. I have some long-running drafts sitting in my userspace, including a radio station that just won't move to its assigned frequency (and I won't put it there until it moves, and I have waited more than 4 years since creating the page) and another that would be a DYK if it were to be built on existing coverage alone... Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 04:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sounds about right for some stations. :) We had one translator here in Virginia that held onto a construction permit in Charlottesville (later moving it to Harrisonburg, about 20 miles away) for 15 years(!), it was NUTS!  I'll let you guess who owns that translator. :)


 * If you want to take a crack at that sentence (above in green), we'll consider that permanently in the sandbox. Because at this point, I've done everything I can do. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 04:49 on March 8, 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WMLA (AM)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Clair McCollough
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of ON TV (TV network)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ON TV (TV network) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KVDO-TV
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KVDO-TV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Force for Mexico
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of ON TV (TV network)
The article ON TV (TV network) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:ON TV (TV network) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KVDO-TV
The article KVDO-TV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:KVDO-TV for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WENS (TV)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of ON TV (TV network)
The article ON TV (TV network) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:ON TV (TV network) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KVDO-TV
The article KVDO-TV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KVDO-TV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite/GA1
Hi Sammi Brie. I've got a question (more of a comment) about your GA review at Talk:Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite/GA1 that's related to images used in the article. I'm not sure I agree with your assessment of the non-free images being used in the article; one of them has just been removed by a bot for not being compliant with WP:NFCCP and there's another one that almost certainly fails WP:NFCC that I'm deciding whether to currently prod it or bring it up for discussion at FFD instead. I'm not sure how the removal of these two images would affect the GA review, but non-free use is not usually considered compliant just because an article is a GA or FA as explained in WP:ITSGA. Maybe you can clarify why you feel these two images satisfy all ten NFCCP since having a non-free use rationale is only WP:JUSTONE or the ten non-free content us criteria? -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is why I hesitate about GA reviews...I still feel new and raw when I do them, and the learning curve has been a bit steep at times. I didn't catch that the NFUR was for another article altogether on the infobox page. Really, the other one probably fails NFCC#8 too, now that we have the Graceland suit image which was added later (without that I think it would have been fine). The rest of my review stands, but I definitely have caught the message about being more thorough on examining images in GANs. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 05:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I apologize if my previous post seem to be criticizing you as a GA reviewer; that wasn't my intent at all. I realized you didn't upload the files and add them to the article. I was really just curious about your reasoning for assessing the non-free images as OK and whether I was missing something. The bot removal was simply done as part of routine NFC cleanup and the rationale can be cleaned up if necessary to stop the bot from removing the image (though there's another file that's basically the same being used in Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite (album) which means two really similar non-free files probably aren't needed). If there's a problem though it would be whether it's OK to use an album cover for primary identification of what seems to be a TV show. Perhaps it would be better to use the opening screenshot of the actual broadcast itself or a the cover art for a DVD version (here's one example, but there seem to be several different versions) of the broadcast. As for the jumsuit screenshot, the free image of the jumpsuit used later in the article is one reason why said screenshot isn't needed, but another is that most of the DVD covers I've seen show him in the same jumpsuit which only further makes the screenshot unneeded in my opinion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:19, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd be curious most particularly to find other cases of the use of album covers in similar situations (live concert/TV presentation and a separate article on an album of that concert). I am also going to ping original GA nominator in re: the possibility of using the open to the broadcast as the source for an infobox image. I'd considered that the other image was appropriate since there would not be any freely available photos of the concert itself, but given the jumpsuit photo, on second thought it's redundant.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 06:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've seen cases where a film soundtrack cover has been moved to the main infobox of an article about a film when there's no movie poster being used, but I think this is more of an exception and only for older movies when there's a chance the same imagery was used for both and there's no stand-alone article for the movie soundtrack; in other words, the moving of the album cover is sort of a workaround to avoid the album cover from being deleted per WP:FILMSCORE or MOS:TVPRODUCTION. Anyway, it might be better to continue this discussion on the article's talk page then here since your user talk page might otherwise become bogged down. My bad or not starting this discussion their first. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out. I have to say that I didn't even check the status of the existing images myself. I noticed that it was not particularly the original poster for the concert, but that it was already in the article for a while. I started to think that maybe it was the poster itself! I'll upload a reduced-size version of one of the originals and settle this issue.
 * For the second picture, I think it does meet the standard for fair use. It is illustrating the article of the concert itself with a widely used shot of Presley (often reproduced in newspapers of the time, but I was thus far unable to locate the original handout portrait to confirm the lack of a copyright notice and upload it straight to Commons). Since we discuss the performer and the concert at length, I don't think the picture of the jumpsuit itself would be enough to properly illustrate the article. His likeness seems to be relevant in my estimation.-- GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 19:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the second image meets the standard for fair use, but fair use and non-free content are different when it comes to non-free image use on Wikipedia. Generally for a screenshot such as this, it's the screenshot itself that needs to be subject of sourced critical commentary per WP:FILMNFI; so, discussing the performer and the concert in general is not enough (at least in my opinion). The fact that it might be a widely used shot representing how Elvis appeared at the concert, on the other hand, might help establish it's context of use, but again there probably needs to be some sourced content in the article stating as much about that particular image to strengthen the chance of the file surviving a FFD discussion about it. In other words, you can't just say it was representative if reliable sources didn't say as much. My guess is that most likely any representative image used in the press at the time is going to a PR photo released by whomever produced the broadcast; so, if you can narrow that down, then it's possible it might be PD due to a lack of copyright notice. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WNVL
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Solidary Encounter Party
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KSBK (AM)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KOKL
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KFXD-TV
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KNBS (TV)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

XHV-FM
Can you decipher why someone did what they did on the logo line for this station? user:Rudy2alan (talk)
 * Your guess is as good as mine. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KQLO
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KIHM
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KGMZ (AM)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KGMZ (AM) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of KXIC
Hello! Your submission of KXIC at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ◢ <i style="background-color:#F7E3F7; color:#960596"> Ganbaruby! </i>  (Say hi!) 08:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KGMZ (AM)
The article KGMZ (AM) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:KGMZ (AM) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KGMZ (AM)
The article KGMZ (AM) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KGMZ (AM) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Congrats! :) - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 20:37 on March 27, 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WCNC-TV
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WCNC-TV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WCNC-TV
The article WCNC-TV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WCNC-TV for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WCNC-TV
The article WCNC-TV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WCNC-TV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Modest flowers
Thank you for what you said on Yoninah's talk, - see also Wikipedia Signpost/2021-03-28/Obituary! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WGRI
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey
Can you fix the KPLR-TV and KTVI pages. As KTVI declined to carry Fox Kids, KPLR considered picking up the Fox Kids shows. Had it occured, KTVI would have picked up Wild About Animals and Ths Swamp Critters of Lost Lagoon in the fall of 1996, then picking up Popular Mechanics for Kids and Peer Pressure in the fall of 1997. This never happened. KNLC ended up picking Fox Kids. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:E4F9:5253:385B:FAC0 (talk) 13:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Can you fix the KDNL-TV, Fox Kids, Repercussions of the 1994–1996 United States broadcast TV realignment and KPLR-TV pages. KPLR was intended to carry Fox Kids after KTVI declined to carry it, but turned down by Koplar Communications only to be picked up by KNLC, which due to controversy, KTVI picked up by the fall of 1996. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:E4F9:5253:385B:FAC0 (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Should you fix the citations? KPLR-TV tried to steal the St. Louis Fox Kids affiliation from KDNL as KTVI declined (after it switched from ABC to Fox in 1995), but Ted Koplar says no, and KNLC picked up. The infamous messages during Fox Kids on the Christian station caused KTVI, which initially declined the coverage at first place to pick it up. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:84EE:53BB:F34F:DE5B (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Can you also helped me with WRBU? --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:24DC:17DD:2A9C:1DBD (talk) 04:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Can you please stop pinging me? I'm out here adding references, and, quite frankly, you're being sort of annoying here. The references I have added are on this exact topic, and I take on the projects I want to take on. I'm leaving this here because your IP is dynamic. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 04:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KWSN
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WRTV (New Jersey)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Question
So you've been contributing to DYK since you were eight? Panini! 🥪 15:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No? I was 10 when I started editing, but my first DYKs (Valley National Bank of Arizona and Windsor Park Mall) didn't come until I was 18 in 2014 (User:Sammi Brie/DYKs). Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Oh, silly me. I thought your user page said, "I'm a 15-year old Wikipedia editor". Panini! 🥪 20:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, now I see how that happened! 🤣 Maybe I should revise it a bit... Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 20:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for ON TV (TV network)
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hey
Sammi, we have to stop pinging me, so we are good on referencing. We have discussed the KPLR-TV and KDNL pages. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:5414:D8A2:2FCE:AF5C (talk) 12:53, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WRFT-TV
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KCIX-TV
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Passing GA reviews
Sammi Brie, in your last couple of GA reviews, when passing them, instead of just placing the GA template on the page, you have added "subst:" before the GA, which expands it into other template code. Although it looks the same on the page to the naked eye, it has undesirable results, since various GA processes and others are expecting the GA template to still be there. In future, please be sure to use the GA template in the normal way when you complete a review; the same applies with the FailedGA template if the nomination doesn't pass. Thanks for reviewing! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I caught myself doing that on one or two occasions, but I'm sorry about that. (Doesn't help that you do subst to nominate an article.) I'll definitely remember to be more careful in the future. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KATI (Wyoming)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KXIC
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)