User talk:Sammi Brie/Archive 31

Rewriting ledes on TV station articles
I think you got a great idea. Let's eschew some "unnecessary detail" on the lead paragraphs of TV station articles, like cable channel positions (WP:NOTTVGUIDE). There are thousands of these articles, so...pinging. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , while I'm here, I want to point out another reason I'm trying to improve lead quality.
 * You'll notice with my GA-grade pages and other revamps that the second paragraph is a summary of the article. This has traditionally not been done in the topic area but is what MOS:INTRO calls for. For instance, KDAF:
 * or WCNC-TV:
 * A good summary paragraph, two to three sentences, improves the lead section drastically. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 21:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree. Cable channel positions seems pretty separate from the Terrestrial television itself, and It has no point to be there. I will start removing these from articles that still have it. LooneyTraceYT   comment  •  treats  22:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I agree in almost all cases. I'd leave it in if it's the station's brand (say, WBBH) or it was in the past (WCNC). Canadian articles should have it in all cases because those positions were standardized and also used very heavily in branding. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I 100% concur. You're not going to get articles like KFOR-TV, KWKW or WVPX-TV in every situation―far from it―but the overarching goal should be to compel people not fluent with the industry to look at the article. For how I compose those summaries (which I did assist with for KFOR-TV) I've taken cues from WZFC (AM) and WMMS, but it can be as perfectly succinct as what Sammi did for WCNC-TV. I'm totally on board with an overall cleanup of article intros. :) Nathan Obral • he/him •  t  •  c  • 15:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * A good summary paragraph, two to three sentences, improves the lead section drastically. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 21:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree. Cable channel positions seems pretty separate from the Terrestrial television itself, and It has no point to be there. I will start removing these from articles that still have it. LooneyTraceYT   comment  •  treats  22:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I agree in almost all cases. I'd leave it in if it's the station's brand (say, WBBH) or it was in the past (WCNC). Canadian articles should have it in all cases because those positions were standardized and also used very heavily in branding. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I 100% concur. You're not going to get articles like KFOR-TV, KWKW or WVPX-TV in every situation―far from it―but the overarching goal should be to compel people not fluent with the industry to look at the article. For how I compose those summaries (which I did assist with for KFOR-TV) I've taken cues from WZFC (AM) and WMMS, but it can be as perfectly succinct as what Sammi did for WCNC-TV. I'm totally on board with an overall cleanup of article intros. :) Nathan Obral • he/him •  t  •  c  • 15:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree. Cable channel positions seems pretty separate from the Terrestrial television itself, and It has no point to be there. I will start removing these from articles that still have it. LooneyTraceYT   comment  •  treats  22:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I agree in almost all cases. I'd leave it in if it's the station's brand (say, WBBH) or it was in the past (WCNC). Canadian articles should have it in all cases because those positions were standardized and also used very heavily in branding. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I 100% concur. You're not going to get articles like KFOR-TV, KWKW or WVPX-TV in every situation―far from it―but the overarching goal should be to compel people not fluent with the industry to look at the article. For how I compose those summaries (which I did assist with for KFOR-TV) I've taken cues from WZFC (AM) and WMMS, but it can be as perfectly succinct as what Sammi did for WCNC-TV. I'm totally on board with an overall cleanup of article intros. :) Nathan Obral • he/him •  t  •  c  • 15:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

IA bot
I got a few articles archived yesterday. But today when I tried, it says I'm blocked from editing? -420Traveler (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , it's a known bug. Try again. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KICU-TV (Visalia, California)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WBAW (AM)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Stadium district
I completed a review at Template:Did you know nominations/Stadium district and made suggestions. I hope to see it on the main page soon. Cheers. Flibirigit (talk) 14:19, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KVEA
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Stadium district
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KTVK
 Schwede 66  12:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KDBV
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WUCW
The article WUCW you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WUCW for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KDAF
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KFOR-TV
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KCON (AM)
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Glen Cove, Vallejo, California
Hey Sammi,

Since the Glen Cove article you nominated for deletion was clearly created by a blocked sock with no substantial edits by other editors, I speedy deleted the article under criteria G5: only 100 bytes were added to the article since the sock was blocked. Thanks for all your work. Firsfron of Ronchester 19:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KNUE
~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 00:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski,  BennyOnTheLoose, 🇷🇼 Amakuru and  Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Name changes
Hey – just wanted to drop by and say you're doing great work on the article moves when there are call sign changes. I'm glad people have taken up the mantle; makes me feel better that I don't have the time to be around here like I was a decade ago.

One friendly suggestion, if I could? After you've moved the article, don't forget to repoint all of the incoming links. Between the navboxes and the state/alpha/frequency lists, stuff can get out of date really quickly, and it's particularly a problem given how quickly call signs get reused; it's just not safe relying on the redirects to carry the load. It's even more important for the call sign swaps; I just repointed a whack of stuff from the KASR/KCON swap you handled about a month or so back.

Keep up the good work and if I can help in any way – tips, tricks, using the mop to move something out of the way – don't hesitate to ask. Mlaffs (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reminder, . I try to do the navboxes at least; the lists I usually don't get around to. I'm glad there are more tools to handle some of the very complex moves we have in our area now. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WCOS-TV
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Help with Member Conflict
Hi, Mvcg66b3r says he's a friend, would you mind looking in on articles WBOC-TV WRDE-LD WRUE-LD WBOC-LD WSJZ-LD - - These stations are all owned by the same company. They recently brought online a new station, and shifted stations around on all of their stations. I live in the local area, and some of the stations duplicate on my receiver. I wrote the chief engineer of Draper Holdings Business Trust and asked for clarification on which channels/subchannels are on each station. I have spent a good bit of my evening editing these stations' articles. Every change I make, Mvcg66b3r insists to reverting to outdated/incorrect information. Information that also was not well presented/sloppy. I have done my best to clarify this information for the average viewer/reader. Mvcq66b3r claims a conflict of interest, I guess because my bios shows that WBOC-TV was the first article I had edited because they were at the time a customer of mine and I saw incorrect information. That was 15 years ago. I have not worked at the company that they were a customer of for over 5 years. I now work for a financial services company and have zero affiliation other than being a casual viewer of their stations that wishes to help out other viewers who are likely confused as to which stations are on which signals these days. (they have changed around many times in the past few years) - Thank you for your time. Bwave


 * Hi . I'm looking through the first edit you made, and I'd have to agree with Mvcg on most points for several reasons.
 * We are in a topic area where things can—and do—get very jargony very fast. I have worked on many articles in this space with the aim of providing detail while ensuring that the topic is easy to understand. I would be uncomfortable listing a DMA in the lede of an article for reasons that include prior legal action by Nielsen about the use of that data in our distant past. The lede SHOULD include all four LPTVs; it also appears that WBOC-LD needs its subchannel list updated if RabbitEars is to be believed.
 * "Click here" instructions should be avoided, per our Manual of Style.
 * However, Draper seems to have a quite convoluted setup, particularly because they operate some of their LPTVs in tandem to provide the same multiplex of programming in the whole of the market. Between the five LPTVs, there's the WBOC-TV mux (CBS, Fox), WRDE-WRUE (NBC, My/Cozi, Telemundo), and WBOC-LD/WSJZ-LD (Antenna, NBC, Telemundo). (WRUE-LD should redirect to WRDE-LD, and WSUZ-LD should redirect to WBOC-LD.) It's actually quite mind-boggling. It's also very unusual in the way it's set up, given the use of all the LPTVs. The NBC and Telemundo services are broadcast on all four low-power transmitters.
 * The issue between you and at WRDE-LD is "where are the studios?". The answer is that the newscast originates in Milton (which houses a news bureau for WRDE and a WBOC office), but production is controlled remotely from Salisbury . Again, really unusual (they say it themselves).


 * What I'm going to do is:
 * Add the other LPTVs to the WBOC-TV lede, using mostly Mvcg's text. There will be a total of three articles with content.
 * Remove the "click here" and put a see also hatnote in its stead.
 * Improve WBOC-LD and WRDE-LD to reflect the additional stations that rebroadcast them, using the information from RabbitEars. WRDE appears to use major channel 31. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 05:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Also @Bwave, is WRUE-LD on the air? The FCC database says it's still a construction permit. Also, I'll need to know if has correct info, since I don't have anything that the Draper engineer would have sent you.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 05:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much Sammi Brie! The main correction I see (it's late) is that WBOC & Fox 21 have studios in Salisbury, MD. WRDE & Telemundo have studios in Milton, DE - they are not shared, they produce their own newscasts, sometimes airing at the same times. And yes, all 5 stations are active as of June 9, 2021 -> https://www.wboc.com/story/44016465/important-programming-note-for-telemundo-delmarva The transmitter locations need to be verified, as they broadcast from 3 different tower locations I believe. I will research. As far as the programming of the stations, I have an email direct from the stations' head engineer (carbon copied with station manager) of the stations, their channels, their call signs and video formats. I had intended to scan the documents into WikiMedia, but would need to redact personal identifying information, at which point I'm not sure how useful it would be. I can send you the unedited email via a private message at a future time. I wasn't 100% done, but it became an edit war and I was getting frustrated. Thanks again, if you don't mind, I'll send additional information to you at a later time, and let you moderate the changes? Bwave (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Oh and one last thing, none of the stations are a direct repeat of another. A couple/few may share some channels, but not a 100% match on channels, and also, some have different video formats 1080i vs. 720p. Bwave (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * You can email me the information and I can work on putting it in. You should also see if RabbitEars is up to date. A bit of looking through Telemundo Delmarva on Facebook reveals that that operation is indeed in Milton.
 * The transmitters, per FCC filings, are: WBOC-LD and WRDE-LD with WBOC-TV at Laurel; WRUE-LD between Salisbury and Pocomoke City, to the south; and WSJZ-LD in Millsboro, to the northeast. There is a pending modification application to move the WSJZ-LD tower further north to a mast to be built in Milton and change to a nondirectional antenna. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 06:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for 3rd update since your last reply. Here is the email from the station clarifying channel assignments: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wboc_Email_September_2021.png Bwave (talk) 06:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Linkrot
In regards to your message on linkrot, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Archiving_a_source#Ghostarchive.org might be helpful. GreenC just added it in. Rlink2 (talk) 22:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)


 * A bit late for the videos I specifically mentioned, but useful nonetheless. Thanks for the heads up. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KWEM-LP
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

it's corny...
but I saw that you competed in a wiki backlog drive under the trans pride flag, and it just—brought a smile to my face. it's really encouraging. thanks for being awesome! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 07:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KPEC-TV
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WQHK-FM
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Category Question
Hey Sammi, would I be correct in assuming that with this category the bot will be coming around in a bit and removing the slogan field from all of the radio station pages? -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 20:50, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Separate issue. This is part of the project tagging I described to help identify radio stations that are not tagged in WPRS. I'm doing something similar for TVS that, because of that project's historic scope issues, will likely result in a lot of pages being tagged in it for the first time (particularly non-North American topics). Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 21:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. I just noticed something changed and thought that was it, but that works too. :)  I know, across all the pages I watch, that all are tagged within WPRS and the WikiProject for their respective state.  So, Virginia, West Virginia, and parts of Maryland should be just fine (let me know if it isn't). :) -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 21:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Most of this is about just ensuring pages are tagged that belong in the project by virtue of the infobox they contain. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 22:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KCPQ
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KCPQ you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KCPQ
The article KCPQ you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KCPQ for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Davey Whitney Complex


A tag has been placed on Davey Whitney Complex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 16:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I've removed the speedy deletion from the article, as it was improper (does not fall under A7). Sammi Brie isn't the page creator, anyhow, so this never should have been posted here in the first place. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * This is at least motivating me to scrounge up a few citations... But yeah the topic is clearly notable (basketball arena at a Division I university). Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 16:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mexican media image vandal
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mexican media image vandal, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mexican media image vandal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mexican media image vandal during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. firefly ( t · c ) 10:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

KTVW
Hello Ms. Brie,

Your article on channel 13 in Seattle-Tacoma is very good. You did a great job. But (there is always a but) I would like to respectfully take exception to your removal of my details about the 1970 stock market program. You characterize it as being KTVW-produced and off-the-air by the end of March 1970 (along with the rest of the local programs on KTVW). It was neither. As I wrote, it was produced by Rockwell Hammond, who leased the air time from KTVW. The program was called Business Action Line and aired live weekdays from 7 AM to 9 AM. (I think your start date of 1967 might be a typo. More likely it was 1969.) I walked into the Northern Life Tower studio in June 1970, looking for a job. The place was deserted except for Hammond and Merrill Mael. All of the salesmen were gone.

Rocky asked me if I would work for no salary. I said that I would and with that I replaced Dick Stokke who was on sick leave. I sat next to Merrill. I operated the three cameras, the switcher, the audio board and the microwave transmitter back to KTVW. And I read the news. Who needed a salary!

By early September 1970 I was out of money and living in Hammond's basement. He was able to pay me $500.00 for the time I was there. When I left in early September they were still on the air. (My name began appearing in TV Guide's Seattle edition during the week that I left. Like I said, who needed a salary!)

With kind regards, Joe McCusker 2003:F8:5735:2536:A867:F59A:14F8:8B61 (talk) 11:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Ooops! I had a typo. The program was on from 7 AM to 1 PM. In my message to you, I said 7 AM to 9 AM. Sorry. Joe McCusker 2003:F8:5735:2536:E5AB:DC96:AC5C:E47B (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Joe, thanks so much for sending this in! It's really gratifying to get comments like this. The KTVW/KCPQ article was woefully underdeveloped, and it's very clear why: KTVW was not much of a TV station. It was one of the last major-market VHFs to go color, and McCaw died right when he started having the right ideas (a death that set the station back quite some time). KTVW ran like a UHF indie on the VHF band, which I can say comfortably after working on such articles as KBCW (TV). It's really no wonder that they were the first V to air something like this. I'm doing my research now...
 * The 1969 article "Merrill Mael Presides Over Stock Market Show" (Seattle Times, August 24, 1969) does state they began in 1967. "When this service to investors, conceived by J. Elroy McCaw, station owner, began two years ago, it marked a national "first" for KTVW-TV. Channel 13 was the nation's first TV station in television's VHF band to offer stock-market programing."
 * I cannot find any reference to it being called "Business Action Line" in the Times, but I did find that it last aired June 15, 1972. Apparently this was a second run which began...June 15, 1971, when Mael reorganized the production under a new company called Financial Information Services. The station asked for more money in contract talks that took place during the sale to Blaidon.
 * Hopefully this responds to your concerns. The business program had an on-and-off history, so it makes sense that there were some issues piecing its history together. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WTAF-TV (Indiana)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Horizon Community Learning Center


A tag has been placed on Horizon Community Learning Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. – S. Rich (talk) 03:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Horizon Community Learning Center


The article Horizon Community Learning Center has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unreferenced; no indication of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – S. Rich (talk) 03:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KNUZ-TV
M ANdARAX •  XAЯAbИA M  00:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KVOF-TV
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KPNX
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KPNX you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 06:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KCPQ
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KPNX
The article KPNX you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KPNX for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 02:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

ib tv
Just a note, this change didn't work as intended because data41 will always have something in it. You could always move the #if statement to that data value, but at that point it's just rearranging the deck chairs. Primefac (talk) 09:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I'd kind of figured that out, . I was attempting to respond to a concern and couldn't test by simply previewing another page (see Template talk:Infobox television channel) where the header was showing up even if there were no fields to show under it. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KWKC
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of KOPR-TV
Hello! Your submission of KOPR-TV at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ktin (talk) 01:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Ktin (talk) 01:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is, who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:


 * 1) with 5072 points
 * 2) with 3276 points
 * 3) with 3197 points
 * 4) with 1611 points
 * 5) with 1571 points
 * 6) with 1420 points
 * 7) with 1043 points
 * 8) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.


 * wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
 * wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
 * wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
 * wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
 * wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Montana TV station articles
I saw you split the KBZK article from KXLF-TV. Could you split NBC Montana into KECI-TV, KCFW-TV and KTVM-TV? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Mvcg66b3r: After having done NBC Montana, the stations were always interconnected. KCTZ had its own independent program history—even independent local news!—before being owned with KXLF. One article is appropriate for NBCM but not so much for KBZK without crowding KXLF's article. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 00:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KMXO
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KHXS
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KPNX
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WNJU
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WNJU you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WVLT-TV
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WVLT-TV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KOPR-TV
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Knoxville Journal
Hello! Your submission of The Knoxville Journal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mind matrix  16:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KNCR
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KXGF
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WNJU
The article WNJU you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WNJU for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WMSB (FM)
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KGRZ
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name

 * Fairly sure I've pestered you about this before! -- TNT (talk • she/they) 00:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Looks good to me. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd be enthusiastic about Sammi as an admin. Being very content-focused to the exclusion of traditional administration is the thing people would say, but I don't think the history of RfA bears out that this actually gets enough opposition to either fail or make something unusually acrimonious (important distinction...). I'm also, importantly, not sure it's true. Sammi is huge in a lot of our main page processes, which need admin labour. She's a massive producer of quality content, a smart and well-reasoned person who can create and consider complex ideas, and deeply involved in a part of the project that needs people with the tools to keep it running and correct its issues (WP:ERRORS is starved for mops). She'd be fantastic. Vaticidalprophet 00:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I disagree with you on both counts. Ergo Sum's RfA in January 2020 was somewhat acrimonious with yours truly opposing due to lack of admin work. Also, Miss Brie's AfD work is enough to assuage such concerns, as AfD is one of the first points of scrutiny encountered by candidates. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I went 'unusually' for a reason -- Ergo Sum's RfA is specifically one I've been thinking about a lot lately, and I was specifying a much higher intensity than its (more of the "drives you off the project or considering it"/"horrible and broken process" kind). I'd forgotten Sammi's AfD work, thanks for the reminder; I was counteracting her own possible argument, because I know in the past she's expressed a sense of feeling too little other-involvement to run RfA, and I wanted to remind her there are important admin-needing tasks in her direct area of most interest. Vaticidal<b style="color:#66023C">prophet</b> 00:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I've seen Sammi around before and think she would make a great sysop.  Java Hurricane  04:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm very humbled to hear all these kind words, but with my RL situation right now, I'd like to wait until I have a bit more certainty on things before committing to an RfA. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 07:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Follow up on regional categories
Hey Sammi! So regarding the categories, what are the parent categories or pages?
 * Insular Areas mass media navigational boxes‎ -> Insular area "Insular areas mass media navigational boxes"?
 * Midwest Region Intrastate Broadcast Templates‎ -> Midwestern United States "Midwestern United States mass media navigational boxes"
 * Northeast Region Intrastate Broadcast Templates‎ -> Northeastern United States "Northeastern United States mass media navigational boxes"?
 * Southeast Region Intrastate Broadcast Templates‎ -> Southern United States "Southern United States mass media navigational boxes"?
 * Southwest Region Intrastate Broadcast Templates‎ and Northwest Region Intrastate Broadcast Templates -> Western United States "Western United States mass media navigational boxes"? Gonnym (talk) 08:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * There's a lot of cruft in this whole mess. You are correct that is one of the CfDs I need to do. There should not be any categories titled Intrastate by the time I'm done; seems like a few obscure editors eons ago gave us some crufty cat titles. The parent cat, Category:Regional Intrastate Broadcast templates, should be renamed "United States mass media navigational boxes by region". Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 08:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding a ping for . Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 08:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Nominated the parent category now. Gonnym (talk) 08:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm going to go to bed now,, but this cat tree is dreadfully named. Hopefully this gives you an idea of what needs doing. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 08:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

KSNW
Can you rewrite the History section for KSNW When It was on its construction permit, and other stuff as well please? LooneyTraceYT  comment  •  treats  23:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KBIM-TV
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WVLT-TV
The article WVLT-TV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WVLT-TV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for WNJU
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for KWFS (AM)
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of KRZB-TV
Hello! Your submission of KRZB-TV at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ktin (talk) 21:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC) Ktin (talk) 21:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">Happy Holidays text.png Hello Sammi Brie: Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Yee no   (talk) 🍁 06:29, 25 December 2021 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Orphaned non-free image File:Aire Libre logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Aire Libre logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Canal 28 Nuevo Leon logo 2017.png
Thanks for uploading File:Canal 28 Nuevo Leon logo 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)