User talk:Sartoresartus

AfD nomination of Peter Beinart
An article that you have been involved in editing, Peter Beinart, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

Foreigners out! Schlingensiefs Container
I notice that you proposed this article for deletion; I have removed the prod template, as I do not think you made a sufficiently strong case that the article should be deleted. You note that the article is a stub and likely to remain one, but that is true of many Wikipedia articles - there are many subjects about which simply not much can be said, but that does not mean they should be deleted. Rather, it means they should be considered for merging into longer articles. You actually seemed to recognise this with your nomination, as you suggested the article be summarised in the Christoph Schlingensief article - in effect, that is what a merge is. (Merging is preferable to deletion as it means the information is not lost, and it is easier to reverse if necessary.) I suggest you add the mergeto and mergefrom templates to those articles, and add a note on one of their talk pages explaining your reasons.

(As an aside: it's a good idea when you propose an article for deletion to notify its authors. In this case, there wasn't much point as the main contributor to the article hasn't edited Wikipedia since he created it back in 2007, but it's a point to remember in future.) Robofish (talk) 23:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

James Corden
Sorry to add another notification to your talk page so quickly, but I also thought I should let you know that I partially undid your edit to this article, which removed a great deal of information, here. The information you removed was not 'trivia'; it may not have been presented very well, but it was arguably listing important achievements in Corden's career. I agree that trivia should be removed from articles, but this wasn't trivia; for more information about what sort of material should be removed, see the guideline WP:Handling trivia. Robofish (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Marlene Dietrich
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Marlene Dietrich, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I explained at some length on the talk page why I removed the maintenance template, namely that all the added information was sufficiently sourced -- from a book by the subject's own daughter, which is generally regarded as exhaustive and authoritative and not seen as hostile in the manner of Mommy Dearest. I can't help it if fans have strong feelings about the subject of their adulation.Sartoresartus (talk) 16:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Khaled Al Maeena
Instead of distorting the sourced statement, add a source indicating that he was fired. --Egeymi (talk) 16:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The same. --Egeymi (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Stop reverting the edit, you're out of your depth. The current king is Salman; who was or was not fond of Almaeena is of no interest to readers of an encyclopedia; there is no point mentioning a letter your boss wrote about the floods unless we say what the letter was about. If you want the addition sourced, add a [citation needed] tag. Sartoresartus (talk) 16:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? The source you distorted says that Khaled Al Maeena was the editor-in-chief. It does not contain any info about his dismissal.--Egeymi (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Minor edits
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. DrKay (talk) 09:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Georg Schafer
I received your message via e-mail and I am open to more discussion about your offer. I have been looking for the original document to which you referenced. Mani schafer (talk) 00:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

my e-mail address
mani at omahe dot com Mani schafer (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2017 (UTC)