User talk:Sciophobiaranger

Discussion at Talk:United States#National March
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:United States. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

United States' economy
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krull The Eternal (talk • contribs) 16:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Spam is against the Wikipedia Talk Page Guidelines. Just an FYI: "While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia." Unless you have something meaningful to say (it appears not), do not say anything at all.--Sciophobiaranger (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Here is a list of sources used by wikipedia and their correlating official estimates:
 * http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP_PPP.pdf
 * International Monetary Fund As you will see, you will see for majority of countries on this list - in 2013 they are reported as official statistics (unshaded) and in 2014 as unofficial staff estimates (shaded). This is because they have not released their official report for 2014.


 * Wikipedia usually uses either The World Bank or the IMF for their GDP statistics, and these are usually updated when the official report comes out. If you have an issue, take it up on the talk page instead of edit warring (again). Edits on Wikipedia are based on a consensus of editors, so stick to that guideline. --Sciophobiaranger (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The information for USA is an official estimate. For China it is a staff estimate, but it is with more than 190 billion dollars higher than the us. Firstly, it is implausible to occur such a big differences between estimate and reality, and secondly, the third source(which, obviously, remains the only left you would agree to be the truth) states that China has the biggest economy. - comment added by Krull The Eternal (talk • contribs)
 * The fact remains that there is no official statistic for China in 2014 and therefore the 2013 statistics will be used for rankings in this case. You can check the talk page of the article or the edit histories to see that this is the consensus came up at the end of March and still remains.Sciophobiaranger (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Economy of the United States
You've been warned per the result of WP:An3. While you both broke 3RR, the other party was much more stubborn and has been reverting since November 2014. Consider an WP:RFC or other steps of WP:Dispute resolution. Continuation of the war is likely to produce more blocks. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm Viriditas. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to United States Department of Homeland Security seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

usa Economy
How I have been feeling during the last 2 months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krull The Eternal (talk • contribs) 18:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You should get over the grudge, it's been what, two months? -Sciophobiaranger (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)