User talk:Sergecross73/Archive 2

Smashing Pumpkins
Hey man, I saw you took off the post I put up about the SP release date and the songs left to be completed by Nicole Fiorentino. I was having trouble citing it, and you can view her post (this is her official fb page) here: http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=245581175485987&id=100001023206131

all the best, --HeyBlue2011 (talk) 14:29, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Operation Rainfall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Rainfall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Operation_Rainfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crabbattler (talk • contribs) 20:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * You need not notify me, I didn't create the article, and I've already responded at the AFD anyways...(since I have the article on my watchlist, I saw you put it up for AFD.) Sergecross73   msg me   20:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Regarding Wii U edits
Hey there - I hope you're well! I just wanted to let you know that Eggplante.com has been doing gaming reviews and interviews, attending shows like E3, etc. for three years now, and finding out the Wii U ran on HDMI was from Eggplante.com exclusively first. No other gaming outlet had that listed. The "behind the scenes" sneak around was back in the private media area. Please take a look at http://www.eggplante.com/category/gaming/ for more gaming posts from us. We're not as big as IGN or GameSpot, sure, but we are still a news site, and while it may be a bit self-serving to put our link up there, it is still valid and of course in an un-obtrusive space. I've also changed the link so that we're not on every mention of HDMI in the post, which is fair. I'm sure you understand. Thanks, chris_kalan (talk) 01:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Cross of the Dutchman AfD
You recently left a vote at the Articles for deletion/Cross of the Dutchman (game) AfD. Since your vote, the article in question has been significantly changed. Could you please go and inspect the article and re-work your vote, if necessary? Silver seren C 23:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Xenoblade Chronicles
Xenoblade Chronicles is one of the greatest games of our time, so I'm trying to help it get that quantity and quality.

-Player017 (talk) 18:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Um...okay? Not sure what you're getting at here... Sergecross73   msg me   18:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh, you didn't? By that, I meant "help the article get bigger and better." (Man, using the 3DS to type this up is a pain in the hands.) -Player017 (talk) 01:43, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I realize that much. It just...seemed strange that you randomly came over to my talk page just to tell me that. Sergecross73   msg me   02:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

DDR Mario Mix's Plot
I heavily trimmed it down and removed the {plot} tag,s ee talk for discussion. :) Salvidrim (talk) 20:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, that was fast! Yeah, it looks way better now. Well done! Sergecross73   msg me   00:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

official gaming sites = fansites?
I just wish you could check these properly before claiming that they are simply fansites.

Redefining history (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. I didn't mean like a fansite for the particular person, I meant like a fansite that documents competitive video gaming or whatevers going on here. These are small, obscure websites that still don't really qualify as a reliable sources. If Gamespot or IGN or someone well known was providing coverage, then that would be a different story. But I'm not sure "mymymy.com" is comparable to such a source... Sergecross73   msg me   16:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
I reply on my talk page. Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon! 17:00, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

FYI
FYI Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.Moxy (talk) 22:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Sergecross73   msg me   22:17, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

RE: Accusation of Conflict of Interest
The same thing i have said to Ridernyc I said NO. I am a 17 years old student, living in Singapore, writing wikipedia articles about dota players from china/denmark/russia/ukraine/USA who are respected by the strong dota community. How does that have anything to do with conflict of interest. If you want more info, my exams just ended and i thought i could be doing this. AND FYI : THE THREAD WHERE THIS ALL STARTED Redefining history (talk) 01:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * (Sorry SergeCross for butting in!)
 * I fail to see how that thread is even remotely relevant to the current AfDs for notability issues on all of your creations. It has been established that "pro DotA players" were not notable, I believe it might be a good idea to just accept that and move on to do something productive.  No offense, I know you mean well, but as explained at length and by numerous people, these people just don't have their place in an encyclopedia.  I hope it doesn't deter you from contributing positively to other Wikipedia articles in the future. :) Salvidrim (talk) 02:11, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, butt in any time on my talk page. You just said pretty much the same thing I would have said anyways! ^_^ Sergecross73   msg me   13:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Serge, this is being discussed at AN/I. Salvidrim (talk) 22:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I actually had already stumbled upon it and commented at it before you left this message. (I think I stumbled upon the discussion on somebody elses talk page...it might have been yours actually.)  Sergecross73   msg me   13:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ... "Salavadrim". *facepalm* Salvidrim (talk) 22:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Haha, no no, it's fine. I only saw it because I was aimlessly going about wikipedia pages the other day. I actually thought it was strange no one told me about it before I found it, since I had been around for so much of it. But yeah, thanks for the heads up anyways. Sergecross73   msg me   01:54, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

What's your idea
congratz on earning a barnstar. ok, let's get to our point. I wanted to add a new section to Grace for Drowning about the music videos of albums. right now 3 videos released from the album and each one of them has their own meaning. i thought it's good to add a section for them and write about each video and their meanings. so funny that steven start walking and following these Mind Control things. so what do you think? ( Reza  ( Let 's Talk ) 21:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC))
 * The visual aspect to his music does seem to be something important to SW's overall "experience" with his music, so it may be worthwile to include to some degree. Right now, there's nothing in the article about it at all, right? At the bare minimum, we could name the videos and briefly describe what going on in them. However, we wouldn't want to go into the video's "meanings" unless we've got some reliable sources from SW or someone describing it. If we just put our interpretations in there, it'd be original research. Sergecross73   msg me   12:43, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

How You Remind Me
You were right to remove the info, but I will note the UK Rock chart is based entirely on singles sales - songs can and often do stay on for years, and often reach No. 1 years after release, given the slump rock music is in. "Livin on a Prayer" and "Bring Me to Life" are two singles that have done this. Just wanted to inform you of that. :)  Toa   Nidhiki  05  20:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the thought of the reminder, though I did realize that. I just meant that I knew that particular, decade old song wasn't currently on the charts. But it could hypothetically happen, yes. Perhaps it wasn't the best edit summary of mine, but I've grown impatient with the user I reverted (Joseph201), as he is constantly causing trouble with his editing... Sergecross73   msg me   20:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I see... I don't like editors like that. The song actually is charting at the moment, at No. 11. Nowhere near number-one, but... :P
 * BTW, just reverted the guy for you.  Toa   Nidhiki  05  21:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the revert. I saw you left him a comment on his talk page too, at the same time I did. Thanks for that too. Sergecross73   msg me   21:14, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No prob. :)  Toa   Nidhiki  05  21:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikia
Do you go to the Wikia?~Tailsman67 of the Wikia~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 04:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I don't. There's too much fan speculation and unverified information. Sergecross73   msg me   14:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow your up tight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 21:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I see no need for personal attacks! I am active on at least one Wikia (where I am admin and maintain, etc.), and SergeCross is correct that facts are unsourced. (In reference to gaming Wikias), most are made by and for gamers, more to help, aid and otherwise guide them than to provide neutral, verifiable information.  I am not saying Wikias are "less" than Wikipedia is -- it's just a different system, with different goals. -- Salvidrim! (t • c) 21:36, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikia is Wikipedia little brother. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 21:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not disagreeing. Also, please use "~" (four tildes) to sign your posts on talk pages. -- Salvidrim! (t • c) 21:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Salvidrim, I have been dealing with this user for a while now. "Tailsman67", or he uses the above IP or User talk:98.71.62.59. He has no interest in following policies/suggestions or having a rational discussion it seems, so I tend to just do my best to clean up/revert the mess he leaves behind. I imagine eventually he'll tire himself out and stop, or do enough wrong to get blocked. Heck, if you look at his talk page and contributions from the "98..." IP address, you'd see he's probably done enough to be blocked as it is, if I bothered to report him... Sergecross73   msg me   14:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You remind me a lot of Smash the Encidna,anyway it isn't my fault my Ip changes now and then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 14:54, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know who that is, and no one is blaming your for your changes in your IP. I was just showing Salvidrim that you other IP has a lot more warnings. (so far..) Sergecross73   msg me   15:00, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well look him up and I won't tire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 17:38, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Look who up? "Won't tire" of what? I don't even know what you're talking about anymore. If you don't have anything coherent or important to say, please stop. Sergecross73   msg me   16:45, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Also 74.163.25.111 is me to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I know who you are, Tailsman. Your type of editing is painfully obvious to identify, regardless of the IP you're using at a given time. (Usually sloppy, riddled with typos, not on topic, complaining that you can't do something that goes against wikipedia policy, etc.) Sergecross73   msg me   16:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

RE:Attempted Clarification
You know a big Admin will never pay attention to a little Ip and I relies why you guy want me to get a user acocunt,so you guys can block me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You realize IP's can be blocked too, right? You don't need an account to be blocked... Sergecross73   msg me   17:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I know,but if I get a account I'm blocked forever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 17:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * They would do the same to your IPs. It's treated the same, you're not "beating the system" because you refuse to make an account... Sergecross73   msg me   17:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes I am,if I restart my firefox seven times I get a new Ip,happened before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 17:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see what the big problem is with getting an account. You'll be blocked only if you act in a way that deserves a block, whether you use IPs or an account.  If you don't want to be blocked, just follow policies, and nobody's gonna come after you!  Unless you intend to keep using IPs because you intend to continue being disruptive, in which case I can only condemn that behaviour and suggest you find better outlets. I'm hoping the 3-day block makes you... "lose your motivation", so to speak.  --Salvidrim!  T·C 03:32, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That was actually quite similar to what I was going to say. Thank you, Salvidrim. Sergecross73   msg me   03:46, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * HA!That's funny. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 00:33, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * May I enquire as to what is funny? --Salvidrim!  T·C 00:43, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sure he's inferring that he's not about to stop causing trouble of his own free will. But that's fine, he's gone and caused such a stink recently that there's a ton of other people besides me policing his misdeeds now, so that's fine. ^_^ Sergecross73   msg me   20:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well you can't say all my edits are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 17:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Never have I claimed that. --Salvidrim!  T·C 17:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No one say that was the issue. My problem is that you continually and intentionally break wikipedia policies despite there being other outlets for what you want to do. If you want to start random discussions, go to Gamefaqs or some other messageboard. Want to write a ton without providing sources? Go to your beloved wikia. Have a random question? Go to Google. There's no reason for you to be doing any of these types of things on wikipedia. Sergecross73   msg me   17:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Banned again, until 5-Dec... :| --Salvidrim!  T·C 18:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I saw that too. (And I had just been mentioning above that people would be more likely to be watching his moves after the ruckus he caused before too...) Sergecross73   msg me   18:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I got to go....so yeah.>_> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.15.130 (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Using an alternate IP while blocked is not allowed. --Salvidrim!  T·C 15:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Reported at SPI. --Salvidrim!  T·C 15:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Range-blocked. I hope the message gets through... at some point. :| --Salvidrim!  T·C 16:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing that. Sergecross73   msg me   18:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Mario Kart 7. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. With this edit, you reverted a good faith valid edit without providing any reason. Salvidrim!  13:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, sometimes I get tired of repeating the same "Provide a source for this claim" But you are correct, the info was right to be removed, but an edit summary could have been used as well.
 * A pointer for you: Some experienced editors get irritated when you give "canned responses" (templates) like that to them. (Looking at my contributions, for example, it's pretty easy to gather that I'm well aware of how edit summaries work.) I don't mind much, but others may give you some heat for it... Sergecross73   msg me   13:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * *shrugs* Warning templates are the lazy man's warnings, and I'm certainly lazy! However, that edit in particular wasn't clearly revertable IMO, I was actually thinking whether to remove it or slap a {cn} on it -- the fact(s) was perhaps notable.  But I'm just saying that, I haven't done any research into it, so you may very well be right and I may very well be stupid. ;)   Salvidrim!   13:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * And as far as repetitive summaries are concerned, one of the automatic summaries in the dropdown is about "Removing unsourced content", that's what I commonly use. :)  Salvidrim!   13:59, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't think a CN tag was worth it because they said it came from something called "Beano", which as far as I know, either not a reliable source anyways, or at least not an authority on video games. Futhermore, if we kept every entry like that, the development section would devolve into a laundry list of "...and then Nintendo power said there was a Mario course", On this date, Eurogamer said there's a Peach course. Also Gamespot said there's a Donkey Kong level" etc etc etc... Sergecross73   msg me   14:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Of course, I was just speaking generally. You know.  Okay.  How about you forget I've said anything? ._.   Salvidrim!   14:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, perhaps I've come off as too harsh as well. Let's just forget this exchange happened. u_u Sergecross73   msg me   14:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Flyingnarb
I think it is time to report them to an admin for edit warring. What do you think? Thegreyanomaly (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I certainly would like to in theory, but I don't think he's quite done enough for an admin to take action yet. Technically, I don't think he's broken WP:3RR, and while he is being stubborn and unhelpful...I don't think he's gone over that edge yet. 2 things I think would be really good to do in the mean time though would be


 * 1) Keep writing reminders of policies/guidelines he's breaking on his talk page, if he continues to break them.
 * 2) Please join the discussion on the discussion page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Skyward_Sword#Reception_section_-_.22Universal_acclaim.22 I know you have an opinion on this, so it'd be great if you chimed in too. The more people who argue against him there, the less likely his edits are going to stick in the long run.  Sergecross73   msg me   01:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Message Response
Sergecross73 talk:Dommin Re: Dommin Thank you for the message: as to organize by Early Years followed by Album Releases — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdommin (talk • contribs) 21:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Updated the Capitalization Error
 * Added reliable source/interview for genres
 * Most sources were not removed, just arranged to read and flow better
 * Citations were added where requested
 * Only section removed were Influences. Thought better format would be historical and chronological i.e. The Black Keys
 * I thank you for addressing this. It looks like majority of the changes are justified now. One thing not resolved though: that source you presented, as far as I can tell, does not say anything at all about "Americana", or any other of those genres that you added. (Swing, new wave, etc.) Can you provide a different source? Or point to where in that interview that he mentions those genres? If not, it should probably be removed... Sergecross73   msg me   22:51, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Sergecross73, I'll remove it for now until I find a more solid reference. Appreciate your help. I'm new at all this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdommin (talk • contribs) 07:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

List of best-selling music artists
Hey, I just wanted to say that, to me, this may not be your intention, but you are coming off as rude to me. You do not have to act like I am a retard and that I do not know what I am doing when you say "Try reading the subsection titled ABBA". Again, that might not be your intention, but that is how it is appearing to me. You can talk nicely to me. I do not want to start an argument with you, I would actually like to come to some sort of agreement with you or become friends, but I do not appreciate your attitude (how it is appearing to me) towards me and I am not going to put up with it. Despite what you and other Wikipedians think, I do know what I am doing. --BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 13:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Dear BLAguyMONKEY. First, official data isn't preferred on Wikipedia, but third-party independent sources are. Second, a consensus (read this and this) was reached to remove the ABBA's hyper-inflated 370 million figure. @ Sergecross73 - Thanks for the revert as I was about to cross 3RR unintentionally. Scieberking (talk) 13:38, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * @Blaguy - I think you're reading into things some. You said you looked over the talk page and couldn't find anything about ABBA. I said look at the ABBA subsection. It's not my fault you didn't look very hard. Sorry for pointing you in the right direction?
 * @Scieberking - No problem, been in similar situations many times myself, so I try to do the same for others, especially when they have things like consensus on their side. Sergecross73   msg me   13:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

First of all, I never said it was "your fault" that I "didn't look very hard", what I said was "You do not have to act like I am a retard and that I do not know what I am doing when you say "Try reading the subsection titled ABBA". Again, that might not be your intention, but that is how it is appearing to me." If you are going to criticize me and make me look like the asshole, at least get my words right. And with you saying "Sorry for pointing you in the right direction?", you are being a smart-ass and, again, you are trying to make me look like the one with the problem. With your comments, you are only proving my point that you are being rude. I tried to talk to you about it in an appropriate way and you are still being rude to me. --BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 13:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

@Scieberking Are you following me or something? --BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 14:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * What in the world are you so worked up about? Just to recap:


 * Blaguy: How are my edits against consensus? Please tell me. I looked at the talk page and saw nothing that I was going against.
 * Serge: Try reading the subsection titled "ABBA" (Where there is a discussion, on the talk page you were looking for, in regards to this.)
 * I don't understand what's so upsetting about this exchange. I think you're losing sight of the real problem here... Sergecross73   msg me   14:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If you have something to say to Scieberking, you'd be better off writing on his talk page. (However, to answer on his behalf, it's probably not so much that he's "following you" as much as its very easy to track where people are editing on wikipedia, and it's not uncommon for someone to respond on someone else's talk page if they're related to the issue at hand.) Sergecross73   msg me   14:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Picture


You think you can add both to the Sonic Gens page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.49.191 (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't really deal with images on wikipedia. Here's some image guidelines you can read up on if you want though: WP:IMAGE, WP:NFCC Sergecross73   msg me   18:47, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Please Stop
I see you have reverted my Linkin Park albums sales in the US in the list of best selling music artists. Sir I'll ask you to stop! Why? The link brings you nowhere! If you want 29 million, then you have to find a link that works NOT a link that brings you nowhere! So that's why I took it off. Sure I had change the number before but I wanted to see how you guys react to this, so I took everything off. Please find a real source, I know your not ignorant, but if you want 29 million show me proof. msg me —Preceding undated comment added by Drecool1 on 00:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC).
 * Well, someone else already proved your wrong on your own talk page, so there's really not much to talk about here... Sergecross73   msg me   05:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

DC in Japan
Hi there. Just look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dreamcast&oldid=164047283

It is a old revision of the Dreamcast article from 2007. As you can see from the start, it clearly says there that it was finished in Japan in 2007. That's an extra proof.--Gaming&#38;Computing (talk) 23:22, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * An old revision stating a piece of unsourced info is proof of absolutely nothing, except that some editor wrote this. Do you have a source to back the claim that the DC was discontinued in 2007 in Japan?   Salvidrim!   00:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's as Salvidrim said, an old wikipedia page isn't a reliable source or "proof". This should probably be discussed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dreamcast#Discontinued_date - the discussion I started at the Dreamcast article. The confusion has to do with what we're talking about. All of the sources your provided in your edits referred to discontinuing software, or repairs. The infobox refers when the hardware was discontinued. None of your sources referred to hardware. (The system itself.) Sergecross73   msg me   04:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Re Message
(Well usually when i type something up because im a nobody it get removed even though it is clearly true, their is no official regular stage in Sonic Generations from Sonic 3 okay,no like it is true their is a chemical plant from sonic 2.) -- Smokeyfire
 * Nothing is because "you're a nobody", it's because you're not following guidelines. Providing sources, staying away from original research, etc. Sergecross73   msg me   04:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Okay I accept that, I was in a bad mood earlier today apologies--Smokeyfire (talk) 06:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Smokeyfire

Re:Ply
Thanks for your reply. But I need to tell you something: One, I am deeply offended about what you said about other wikis. Other wikis are just as reliable! You act as if Wikipedia is God, and the others are barbaric savages! Super Mario Wiki (www.mariowiki.com) checks sources just like Wikipedia! They even based their policies off of Wikipedia's! Two, people can't edit E3 2011's video and post it under that name. Please reply. 76.120.127.225 (talk) 21:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to have offended you, but it's not just my personal standpoint that deems them as unreliable, but rather Wikipedia's official policy towards "user generated" content that deems them as "not reliable". Again, the problem is that there's no one checking over the information. Super Mario wiki has no editorial staff fact checking their information. Websites like IGN, do. And that's why IGN is considered reliable in the wikipedia sense. I could, in theory, go over to Super Mario wiki, make a claim that Mario is 200 years old, and then use it as a source here, when in fact, that would be very wrong. You can't do that to IGN articles. There's no sense of wikipedia superiority there; wikipedia articles can't be used as reliable sources either.
 * As for your other point, youtube is to be avoided because of WP:COPYVIO problems, where Youtube doesn't really have the rights to such videos, and thus shouldn't be used to sources. In cases like this, where it is in fact most likely real, it shouldn't be that hard to just find it's original source, or a reliable source, and use that instead. (Salvidrim found one very easily himself I believe.) Sergecross73   msg me   21:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Mario Kart 7
What else can't I do such as the list of characters I put on there, as I don't want to do something baad without knowing. Please reply on my talk page. Thanks   Matthew   Talk   13:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Most of the points in WP:GAMECRUFT are probably the biggest things to stay away from. Browse over that...and feel free to ask if you have any further questions on it. Sergecross73   msg me   13:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Help.
Do you know how to make a poll? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.146 (talk) 18:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I don't. Is this in reference to something in particular? Sergecross73   msg me   19:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Editor confirmed in this diff that he was Tailsman67.  Salvidrim!   19:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I hadn't seen that edit in particular, but I was pretty sure it was him beforehand, due to his editing. (Notaforum violations, adding speculation to Sonic articles, writing style, etc.) Sergecross73   msg me   20:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not tailsman dude,we are friends but no. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.146 (talk) 20:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Tailsman67 writing style is just to fool you guys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.146 (talk) 20:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, it's amazing, there are so many people that act and post exactly like him, but aren't him! >_> Sergecross73   msg me   20:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * So what,sloppy writers want to be sloppy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.146 (talk) 20:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Alright, unless you start saying something of substance, this conversation is over. Sergecross73  msg me   20:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Everybody does forms on talk pages,you didn't let me finish the writing,and I'm not my cousin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.146 (talk) 20:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No, they don't. If you think they do, you probably don't understand the policy then. Sergecross73   msg me   20:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I have just left a very stern warning on the IP's talk page, raising the stakes a bit to let them know just how perilous their situation is. -- McDoob AU  93  20:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Very much so appreciated. Sergecross73   msg me   20:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I've added your talk page to my watchlist so I'll help keep an eye on things as a friendly talk-page stalker. -- McDoob  AU  93  20:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Salvidrim do the same thing to each other's talk pages as well. Sergecross73   msg me   20:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Another one? ;)  Salvidrim!   20:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Time to let this IP burn itself out ... he's not being sincere in his "apologies" that he spread all over our various talk pages, and admittedly all we're doing is feeding him. He's on Level 4 warning, so if he does something else he'll get reported to AIV; let's let that be that. -- McDoob AU  93  01:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, sounds good. Sergecross73   msg me   02:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I partially take that back ... take a look at this. Appears to be outing a sleeper account to me. Salvidrim already ID'ed it, but for this supposedly new IP to go directly to it ... I'm wondering if we have enough to go to SPI again. -- McDoob  AU  93  02:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * There's also this, where he links to some 4 year old account that complains they they left due to wikpedia's rigid policies, which is exactly what he was randomly linking to here in his last IP, for what it's worth. Sergecross73   msg me   02:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well he's got enough rope, so to speak ... -- McDoob  AU  93  02:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Using multiple IPs, accounts, etc., especially when they do not edit concurrently, is not technically against the rules. But the moment one of them is banned, I have no doubt he'll go to the others, and THEN they can be banned, one by one, as he burns through his IPs, for ban evasion, through SPI.   Salvidrim!   09:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually it is. See this template, which I have just posted on the most recent IP (the one from yesterday). -- McDoob  AU  93  18:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)