User talk:SevcoFraudsters

A page you started (Katie Fraine) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Katie Fraine, SevcoFraudsters!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good article"

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cork City W.F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Boot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Sheffield FC.svg
Hi SevcoFraudsters. File:Sheffield FC.svg was removed from all articles except Sheffield F.C. as a result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 2. was the administrator who closed that discussion and they were the editor who initially removed the file from all of the other articles and the non-free rationales for these usages from the file's page. If you disagree with Peripitus' close, then you can and should discuss it with them. The FFD discussion was open for almost two months before it was closed and no arguments were provided in favor of any usage other than "Sheffield F.C.", but admins do have some discretion when it comes to their closes so perhaps Peripitus will reconsider theirs if you can make a convincing case. Regardless, I do not think simply re-adding the file to the article without discussing it with the closing admin is the way to go, and could possibly be considered edit warring. For reference, I asked Periptus about this at User talk:Peripitus. I pinged you in that discussion, but am posting here just in case the ping didn't work. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The women's team have just as much right to that emblem as the men's team. The problem with your tedious monomania is chiefly one of sexism: you're quickly corrected/reverted at the articles for male sports teams, but women's teams generally have fewer watchers so the articles stay in their defaced state for longer. Perhaps in your universe this is you "winning"? I don't know - don't care. You clearly have some sort of morbid psychological disorder which I'll leave to the specialists, with a shudder! But hey, to each his own. For my part I'll keep repairing the damage wherever I come across it. Yours etc. SevcoFraudsters (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The usage of the file was discussed and it was an administrator who made the final decision to remove from every article other than the men's team. Similar logos have been removed by other administrators from other articles for the same reason: It has nothing to do with sexism, but everything to do with whether the usage complies with WP:NFCC, which is policy. If you want the close reviewed, then discussing it first with the closing admin is considered the way to go. Simply reverting as you are doing is against the consensus achieved at FFD and is possibly a violation of not only WP:EW, but also WP:3RR. So, I'm asking that you reconsider, self revert and discuss things with the closing admin; otherwise, this likely to end up at WP:AN3. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

SevcoFraudsters, this is not how things are done on Wikipedia. I closed the discussion and your path to dispute this is to discuss it with me. If you don't like the outcome of that discussion you can follow the procedure at Closing_discussions. What you can't do is ignore the main point in Edit warring Don't use edits to fight with other editors – disagreements should be resolved through discussion.. I have restored the close, can you please stop fighting with the revert button and, come and discuss the close. Peripitus (Talk) 11:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * What's the point of discussion with two robotic 'tards who have already arrived at their stupid decision? If you automatically consider women's teams "child entities" of the men – especially in cases like this one, where the women play at the top national level and the men in the lower regional categories – then hell mend you! SevcoFraudsters (talk) 11:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KilkennyUnitedWFC-logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:KilkennyUnitedWFC-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sporting Club Albion Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sporting Club Albion Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WNL logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:WNL logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Yeovil Town W.F.C. squad


A tag has been placed on Template:Yeovil Town W.F.C. squad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"G8: squad template for a football club that no longer exists"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peamount United.png
Thanks for uploading File:Peamount United.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)