User talk:Shapeyness/Archive 6

Quine–Putnam indispensability argument

 * Thanks ! Alduin2000 (talk) 18:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Tony Williams Lifetime - Turn It Over.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Tony Williams Lifetime - Turn It Over.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Timothée Chalamet&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Gender identity&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:31, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 07:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

FA
Hi Shapeyness, I very much enjoyed reading your article for FAC; articles with mathematical content are so rare there, so I hope it passes. If by any chance you were able to leave comments at Featured article candidates/Affine symmetric group/archive1, I would be grateful. All the best, JBL (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, I did have a look at the article but was a little intimidated by the technicality and also by the fact that I've never reviewed for FAC before. I will have another look and give it a proper go in the next few days though, hopefully I can give some useful comments. Shapeyness (talk) 20:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for whatever you're able to contribute. (This is my first experience with FAC, and the review of Quine–Putnam indispensability argument was my first review; hopefully I'm right in believing that it's not necessary for every reviewer to check every aspect completely.)  All the best, JBL (talk) 22:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you and congratulations on the article becoming an FA! Shapeyness (talk) 18:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Promotion of Quine–Putnam indispensability argument

 * Congrats! --JBL (talk) 17:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Brilliant work. Well done! Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . Shapeyness (talk) 12:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Defense of Sihang Warehouse&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:British Empire&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 12:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

TFA
Hi Shapeyness. I am planning on running Quine–Putnam indispensability argument as the TFA on 21 November. Given how technical the article is, I wondered if you fancied having a go at the blurb? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, yeah I'd be happy to put something together. Are TFA blurbs basically shortened versions of the article lead or are there any major differences I should be aware of? Thanks. Shapeyness (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Working on the assumption that the lead is all that it should be, yes. Hard limits of 925 to 1,025 characters. Note that that includes spaces! Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * would something like this work?
 * —Shapeyness (talk) 12:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Unsolicited 2c: I suggest moving the sentence "The argument claims ..." to the second sentence of the blurb, on the grounds that "what it is" should come before "how did it come about". (The rest of the flow almost works after a copy-paste, except that the sentence "Many counterarguments ..." would probably need a different pointer than "this idea".) --JBL (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Unsolicited 2c: I suggest moving the sentence "The argument claims ..." to the second sentence of the blurb, on the grounds that "what it is" should come before "how did it come about". (The rest of the flow almost works after a copy-paste, except that the sentence "Many counterarguments ..." would probably need a different pointer than "this idea".) --JBL (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Looks good. Two thoughts:
 * Is it possible to avoid "The ... arguement is an arguement ..."
 * "argument in the philosophy of mathematics ... arguments in the philosophy of mathematics" in the first two sentences seems repetitive. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks both! I've edited the blurb a bit and added it to TFAR. Shapeyness (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quine–Putnam indispensability argument scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 20 November 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/November 20, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:31, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks ! Just a quick question: would an overhaul of the sourcing (comparison with my sandbox) placing Harvard citations into the article prose be problematic – there are no big changes to content but it would still be a major change to the article so not sure if it is better to keep it stable before TFA? FYI the Harvard citations I added are not sourcing content, just linking to primary sources that are quoted or being discussed in the article. Shapeyness (talk) 18:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't see a problem with your doing that. No need for an article to be rock solid stable approaching TFA, so long as you stay on top of any changes. (WP:FAOWN is your friend here.) Gog the Mild (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks I have made the change and left my reasoning on the talk page. Shapeyness (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article, - rare math on the Main page! - Introduced as "about one of the most important arguments in the philosophy of mathematics - according to some, the only good non-question-begging argument at all for platonism. The basic idea is that we should believe in numbers and other mathematical objects because they are indispensable to our best scientific theories. Behind that basic idea is a mix of complex ideas about the nature and goals of philosophy, how we come to know which things exist and which don't, and how language ties into answering these question."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2895 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks ! Shapeyness (talk) 18:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2023 Israel–Hamas war&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 13:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Al-Shifa Hospital&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 20:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Airrack
Hello, Shapeyness. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Airrack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Konstantine Anthony&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 21:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)