User talk:Shapeyness/Archive 5

RE:Hyperpop
Hello, the reason bubblegum bass isn't mentioned is highlighted at Talk:Hyperpop, where it's stated the 'Origins' section is significantly lacking, my edits were in response to this and fully sourced. Thank you 2A02:C7F:38FC:A300:84C6:5D9D:2A19:F31D (talk) 21:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)


 * If that's the case, then I think that it would be better to develop the Origins section before adding the infobox again (with reliable sources of course). Without detail in the prose, the infobox will probably just confuse readers. Alduin2000 (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 07:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 17:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forever in Your Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alienation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AllttA


The article AllttA has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of independent, reliable sources on the subject. I created this article when I knew less about how Wikipedia works."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Volodymyr Zelenskyy&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaush has been accepted
 Vaush, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Vaush help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:39, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Congrats Alduin! I've been watching the draft evolve over time and I'm glad Vowsh has gotten recognition on enwiki. I'll be watching very closely for vandalism. The last time Voosh got a page, it was vandalized almost immediately. (I was the person who originally moved it out of draftspace last year.) SWinxy (talk) 00:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Haha, thanks . Alduin2000 (talk) 10:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Vaush for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vaush is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vaush& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nearlyevil 665  17:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alive in Baghdad.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Alive in Baghdad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Turkish War of Independence&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hyram Yarbro


A tag has been placed on Hyram Yarbro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CUPIDICAE💕 20:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Airrack moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Airrack, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 21:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Paid Editing
Hello Alduin2000. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Hyram Yarbro, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alduin2000. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. TrangaBellam (talk) 22:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * , may I ask what gave you that impression? I am a member of WikiProject YouTube creating a page on a YouTuber, not exactly very surprising. Generally paid editing comes from new accounts, sockpuppets, or accounts that have a history of such editing that has somehow gone under the radar. However, I have been editing for years on a range of topics and have never been accussed of paid editing or even of being biased (as far as I can remember anyway). Clarification would be helpful here, thanks. Alduin2000 (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC) Just adding this here for explicitness: I have not been compensated for any edit. Alduin2000 (talk) 22:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You have been introducing such spam for years and nobody had raised any objections? TrangaBellam (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No. Nobody has ever accused me of paid editing. And I object to your assertion that I have been introducing spam to the encyclopedia for years. I am contributing to the encyclopedia just like you. I would appreciate it if you retract that assertion, . Thank you. Alduin2000 (talk) 22:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You didn't answer the question. What makes you believe Alduin has been paid to edit, or otherwise have a COI? SWinxy (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks,, your comment here is appreciated. , I feel that maybe it would be productive if this conversation is taken to the article's talk page and re-centered around the content of the article rather than my conduct. Perhaps there are legitimate concerns about my writing behaviour (I'm clearly biased on whether or not that's the case), but this can be handled at the appropriate forums. Feel free to disregard my comment about retracting anything, you were just asking a question (even if it wasn't in the most civil or productive manner). However, I (like SWinxy) would still be interested in hearing why you think I'm engaging in UPE. Does it seem likely that UPE would result in an article about a TikTok skincare influencer that states "Doctors have argued that consumers should not take skincare advice from influencers on TikTok"? To me this just seems absurd; if I were a UPE account, I very much doubt I would be paid for that. Anyway, I'll leave a comment on the article talk page about disputed content in a moment. Thanks. Alduin2000 (talk) 16:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Hermann Göring&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Quine–Putnam indispensability argument
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Quine–Putnam indispensability argument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for reviewing the article. Apologies if it's still quite far from GA status, I haven't nominated an article before. Alduin2000 (talk) 11:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, . I haven't found anything so far to make me think the article won't pass. I'll add some more comments today, and go back again after reading some more of the sources. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks, that's great to hear. I'll work through some of your comments in the meantime. Alduin2000 (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Quine–Putnam indispensability argument
The article Quine–Putnam indispensability argument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Quine–Putnam indispensability argument for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Nation of Islam&#32; on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 09:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 10:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Intracranial hemorrhage&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2022 Muhammad remarks controversy&#32; on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!
Here's to hoping that the article passes the review when it begins, and you can help out there as well if you would like to. — The Most Comfortable Chair 22:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for the strawberries! I would have reviewed the article myself (it's 100% up to standard for GA status imo) but I don't have any experience reviewing so I decided to make a few small edits to help out instead. I'll make sure to help out when the article goes through review if I have time too! Alduin2000 (talk) 22:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for all the Fish!

 * Thanks for subtitling it, I didn't know until now that you could subtitle them! Alduin2000 (talk) 12:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Holly Woodlawn&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 03:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
— TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 18:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Alduin2000. Thank you for creating Joseph Melia. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * absolutely, Melia's made some super important contributions that have been discussed quite a lot, especially in the philosophy of mathematics. I decided to just add enough sources to show notability for now though and hopefully other editors will come across the page and add more info. Alduin2000 (talk) 17:29, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * These things tend to remain permastubs, so I encourage you to expand the article. Ten years from now it may still be a stub. Bruxton (talk) 17:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I may come back to it at some point but developing articles like this takes a considerable amount of research time, finding and reading appropriate papers, not to mention getting onto summarising them in the article. I have other priorities atm but I'll not rule out developing it more in the future. Alduin2000 (talk) 17:56, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Azerbaijan&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 14:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Heartstopper (TV series)
Thanks for fixing some of the problems with the new material added to Heartstopper. I wondered if you could do some more, though, as you seem to know what you're doing. For example, it looks now like everyone from Season 1 is returning in Seaason 2, and although most are, not all of them are, at least not according to the sources. Another similar problem is the recurring characters section, which of course was for Season 1, and yet now it's unclear if they continue to be recurring characters in Season 2. I realize you don't have to do any of this, but I thought I'd suggest it anyway. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, do you have any sources in mind when you say not all characters are returning in season 2? Also, do you think opening a section on the article talk page would be useful for deciding if this should be included there? Possibly it should be removed from the cast and characters section and moved down to the casting subsection. I don't really have an opinion on that, I was just trying to tidy up the addition as is. Alduin2000 (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The Netflix source, which is cited in the article, says: "All lead cast members will also be returning for Season 2, including Kit Connor, Joe Locke, Yasmin Finney, William Gao, Corinna Brown, Kizzy Edgell, Sebastian Croft, Tobie Donovan, Rhea Norwood, Cormac Hyde-Corrin and Jenny Walser." It doesn't mention Chetna Pandya (Coach Singh) or Fisayo Akinade (Mr Ajayi). The Deadline source , which you added, says largely the same thing except they also say: "Stephen Fry and Olivia Colman also star", which is a bit ambiguous but appears to be saying that they are returning. You're probably right about opening up a discussion on the article Talk page, which is really the best place to discuss these issues. I started doing that before you tidied up things a bit, which caused me to stop because of much of what I was saying you fixed.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * , I've moved a lot of content about season 2 (including new characters) to a new subsection under the Production section. Hopefully this will solve things for now at least. Alduin2000 (talk) 16:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I strongly suspect your approach won't last. Maybe semi-protection will be enough to keep the edits sane. I confess to being a cynic in these things (been on Wikipedia too long).--Bbb23 (talk) 16:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah I think you're right that things will be re-added anyway. Hopefully semi-protection + taking things to talk if problems arise again so there is an explicit discussion/consensus to point to will settle things. Alduin2000 (talk) 17:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 15:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism
The article Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 06:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism
The article Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Mary, mother of Jesus&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 09:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:AFL&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 12:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Kara (South Korean group)&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 11:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)