User talk:SoloWonder

Welcome!
Hi SoloWonder! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Abecedare (talk) 14:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

WP:TEAHOUSE
I noticed your questions and comments at some article talkpages on my watchlist. While it is nice that you are trying to understand how wikipedia works, these talkpages are not the right venue for such general queries. Can you please visit WP:TEAHOUSE instead (and even there, try to limit your speed of posting, listen to and read what the respondents post and link to, and be considerate of the time these volunteers are devoting)? Abecedare (talk) 14:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Adam's Bridge. bonadea contributions talk 08:56, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * That edit alone was tendentious. Especially as it came after my request to " Please read the link and explain where you came up with the idea that the earliest name should be used. If you don't come back with a reasonable explanation or if your next post is as disruptive, I'll ask for you to be blocked.", a request you ignored at the same time as calling for good faith. As I said there, good faith would be a reasoned responde to my question. If you aren't interested in our policies and guidelines, you don't belong here. That should be obvious.  Doug Weller  talk 09:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Lots of roses & love to you all. Get well soon.


 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.