User talk:SonOfThornhill

Welcome to my Talk Page!

No
You asked "can we discuss the issue of whether the article should have an infobox or not." I guess the answer is no. A related RfC caused already plenty of argument, we are all tired ;) - I like your concise statement there! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! SonOfThornhill (talk) 14:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I suggested that we at least stop saying "infobox haters" and "infobox mob" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Good for you! SonOfThornhill (talk) 15:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

List of James Bond films
I have nominated List of James Bond films for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. The Transhumanist 14:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Lincoln Memorial issue again dispute resolution
In case you missed it on the talk page, there is a dispute resolution notice for this issue. Could you summarise your view of the issue there? —Firespeaker (talk) 23:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

You reverting my edits
You reverted my edits on the grounds that they are from a non-canon source. Can you show me where it says in the policy that non-canon info can't go in the article's first sentence? If there is no such policy, I will be putting the information back. --NetSpiker (talk) 02:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

WP:YESPOV
Please digest. The positive reviews, also by person or persons unknown, should also be removed as they also lack citations.  Cassianto Talk   16:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Then go right ahead and remove them. I was only commenting on the statement in question. SonOfThornhill (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi
Thanks for giving me the thank you on the edit I made for the page of the sixth original Star Trek film. Austin012599 (talk) 17:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)