User talk:Superbeecat

Raj Modi Page Proposed Deletion
Efficient Cause have made some changes in the page. Hopefully, it meets your guidelines now. He is a well-renowned business personality from Kolkata, West Bengal, India and has created exceptional residential and commercial real estate projects. We have cited the sources wherever possible,but there is not much information available about him on the internet. This is why we decided to make a Wikipedia Page about him, to inform the people about his life and achievements. We are always looking forward to improve this page and any suggestion from your part will be highly appreciated. EfficientCause (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey there - Being a prominent business person doesn't necessarily satisfy notability requirements wp:n. I didn't tag for Speedy Deletion, because I'm unfamiliar with the individual, but the sources and a Google search doesn't turn up anything that I believe satisfies notability. I'm going to send this to an Articles for Deletion for other opinions. Please leave the AfD tag up until it's decided. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 18:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Manage Your Dragon Proposed Deletion
I'm sorry, you have listed my page for proposed deletion. Now have you even visited my website? I guess not. Now if you would like to login and explore use the account below: Username: user Password: password

Thank you for your time... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookiedragon234 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi there - Wikipedia isn't for advertising your website. Please read WP:N to learn about Notability. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 19:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

For example look at the homepage of Stack Overflow and then the beautifully professional home page of Manage Your Dragon. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookiedragon234 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No, it isn't but My website's Wikipedia page is not advertising this page, it is merely informing intrigued users about the website, if they are confused of it's purpose. Now, could you answer me whether you have actually looked on my website, and if so I would challenge you to state it is not a professional high class website.


 * Please read WP:N. Notability has nothing to do with how nice a website looks. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 19:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
 Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits to Nobel Prize laureates by secondary school affiliation have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; and Simplified Manual of Style are among many pages that can provide information to help you in editing or writing for Wikipedia. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Nope. Just didn't revert far enough to get everything. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 04:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I was leaving this message but you beat me to it with yours: I have looked at this further and it seems you were trying to revert vandalism but did not restore a completely clean version. So I am deleting the above message. I have done it a few times myself so I try to be aware of the possibility. Sorry for my mistake in not being thorough to begin with. Donner60 (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * No prob. Using Huggle - it reverts the current edit. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 04:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * My initial edit actually did the same thing! Then I noticed that and reverted to an earlier version. I just reverted a comment someone stuck on to the top of this article. It is an active one tonight. And yes, Huggle use was at the root of my earlier mistake. Donner60 (talk) 04:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Hahahah yep :) - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 05:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Cape Hatteras National Seashore
My edits to Cape Hatteras National Seashore were constructive. It is so frustrating because the local or higher news would not reports it. I could not even find it on local news discussion boards with threads. --150.216.254.206 (talk) 09:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sympathetic to this, but Wikipedia is not the news. It's not where to post unsourced, current happenings. If it's notable, and you can provide good secondary sources (citations) then it can stay. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 09:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Raj Modi Page Proposed Deletion (Continued Discussion)
Team Efficient Cause has made some changes in the Raj K. Modi page and we have added some external links to support the information mentioned in the page. Please have a look and notify us. We hope that the information is sufficient. Moreover, we want some help on your part to improve the page and have it on WikiPedia. EfficientCause (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Why do you keep saying "Team" efficient cause? - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 10:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Mitchell Pearce
Sorry for the edit conflicts - I'm protected it from anon users now so should be fairly stable! -- Chuq (talk) 09:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Saw that bud, no prob. Thanks for the semi-prot! Worth bothering AiV all of those IPs? - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat
 * Nah, They are probably bored kids who just did it cause they could.. I reckon they'll stop now! -- Chuq (talk) 10:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sounds good. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 10:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

France–India relations
Please avoid drive-by deletion of correctly sourced non-original research text that I have contributed in order to suitably update the article. If you have concerns, then list them on the talk page so that we can discuss it and take any suitable action. However, if you delete legitimate and good-faith contributions it is unwarranted/disruptive and therefore will be reported.91.182.217.25 (talk) 05:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Superbeecat, but I also don't see why you reverted all of those edits. They improve the article grammatically and add referenced content. Drmies (talk) 05:44, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Huggle misfire. My bad. Sorry guys. Didn't even realize that I reverted that article 'till you brought it up. Completely unintentional. super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat  06:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry.
I'm sorry! I feel very bad. I am not joking. :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.88.88 (talk) 04:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Wineries
I was wondering if there was anything else I could add to the Le Vieux Pin and LaStella pages so that the deletion marker can be removed. Please let me know! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjjoyceng (talk • contribs) 07:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Heya, the article reads a bit like there is a conflict of interest. Are you involved in either or both of these wineries? Also, a lot of sources that simply list the product as existing aren't good sources. The giant block of citations for the awards is longer than the article, which has very little in the way of asserting notability. Why is this winery notable for an encyclopedia? There seems to be buried in the citations a couple of actual articles about the wine, so I'm going to remove the proposed deletion tags. See the stags leap article, for instance... massively expensive Colgin Cellars, and moderately priced Stag's Leap each have articles, neither with massive un-encyclopedic lists of every award. It makes the article read like adcopy without any good info about the winery. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 07:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Actually those are already undergoing AfD discussions at this point (not proposed deletions like I thought). There is nothing to be done but wait for the verdict. If they are deleted, you can re-create them, with better sources, less adcopy, and without the massive lists. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 07:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion
Thanks for the notification. I have responded at the AfD page. I thought this may run into a snag due to the Kickstarter just launching. I was wondering if there was any specific advice you could give me to improve the page in the mean time while it is still up? Idealist343 (talk) 08:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Heya, right now, coverage is fairly trivial, and raising money on kickstarter isn't in itself notable (as many kickstarted games never come to be, even ones with major backing, and established publishers). Usually, a game becomes notable upon release, unless something particularly notable happens pursuant to the kickstarter itself (like fraudulently taking the money and running, or cancellation of a major sequel, etc). I'd be trying to locate and post significant coverage beyond websites mentioning a game that's coming out, which they frequently do for any kickstarter that has a decent amount of money behind it. Is anyone on the team notable (to the extent that they have established wikipedia articles)? Are you personally attached to the project in some way? - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 09:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. And no I am not involved with the game at all. The only reason I am passionate about keeping it is because the whole point of Wikipedia is to provide reliable information for those who seek it. And I was seeking said information and saw there was no article for the game. As far as my unusual interest goes. I miss the days of the WWII shooters, like Call of Duty 2. Idealist343 (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Keep
Hi again. I just wanted to ask you to consider a speedy keep for Battalion 1944. I think that this matches reason #1 very well. If not, that is fine. We can let it run the full 7 days. Just something to consider as consensus seems to be forming. Idealist343 (talk) 02:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Freddie and the Dreamers
"I'm Telling You Now" (by Freddie and the Dreamers) may be the only Rock 'n' Roll Era hit song to begin with a vocal melodic interval wider than an octave. The first two notes of the the vocal ("I'm tell-") span a major 9th, which is very difficult to sing. I wonder if anyone can name another song of the era that opens with an interval this wide (or wider). ˜˜˜˜Warren Bergmann — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bergmannw (talk • contribs) 22:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I did not edit the article 'Adnoartina'.
It was some racist troll who had the same IP address as me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.20.91 (talk) 06:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: Reuven Rivlin
I don't know that I ever edited anything on that page, if I appeared to have edited something, thank you for reverting it, as I have no idea who that person is, and have never been to that page before! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoxyLuffer (talk • contribs) 23:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

RoxyLuffer here again: How do I change my password? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoxyLuffer (talk • contribs) 23:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * RoxyLuffer - You can do this by clicking on "Preferences" (located on the top-right corner of any Wikipedia page), under "Basic Information".  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Baby pac flyer.png
Thanks for uploading File:Baby pac flyer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)