User talk:Swoolverton

Thank you for you edit to the Rover K engine article, but replacing one image with another with no explanation, could be considered vandalism. if you feel your image adds to the article would it not be more constructive as an additional image elsewhere on the page. If you feel you had good reason to replace the existing image please discuss, Thank you - BulldozerD11 (talk) 23:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Great Wall Wingle

I see nothing in this article that screams "SPEEDY DELETE ME!!", but your edit summary is disturbing. Please don't create articles because "Oh, I took these cool pictures and I want them to be on Wikipedia." This isn't a warning or anything of the kind, just a gentle reminder. Thanks for listening. Alinnisawest (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

I have a Flickr account for that. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephenwoolverton/ --Swoolverton (talk) 15:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
The quoted text above is very misleading. Alinnisawest is not quoting me but provides this text a example of what he/she says I am thinking. I agree that I put too much information in my Edit Summary. I am not a wordsmith, I’m a photographer. [did you catch the comma splice?] ;-) Swoolverton (talk) 05:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of KNIE

A tag has been placed on KNIE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sunderland06 (talk) 20:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Pentacon Six articles

Hi! Good to see someone start articles on the Pentacon Six and Pentacon Six mount. I've been meaning to do so myself recently but hadn't gotten around to it. So I hope you don't mind me jumping in and writing lots of content :) --Imroy (talk) 07:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Welcome Imroy. Swoolverton (talk) 15:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Great wall florid

A tag has been placed on Great wall florid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 14:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Great wall florid

I have nominated Great wall florid, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great wall florid. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 21:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

"Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns." It seems clear you did not read my note on the article. Good Day. Swoolverton (talk) 12:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:2008 MG 7.jpg

File:2008 MG 7.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:MG 7 black 2008.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:MG 7 black 2008.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

File:2008 MG engine.jpg is now available as Commons:File:MG 7 black 2008 engine.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

File:2008 MG 7 rear.jpg is now available as Commons:File:MG 7 black 2008 rear.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

I think it’s funny how my Wiki articles about Chinese Automobiles get tagged for deletion meanwhile GM and Chrysler are filing for bankruptcy. Methinks it’s GM and Chrysler that are headed for speedy deletion. ;-) Swoolverton (talk) 05:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Images

Thanks for the images of extrusion dies and continuous casting equipment; especially the latter! Wizard191 (talk) 14:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)