User talk:Tamatisk

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- moe.RON   Let's talk  00:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Check the article now
It's a redirect to another article that is mbeing created, check it now. Haphar 14:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

The speedy in speedy deletion.
The speedy in speedy deletion refers to the speed of making the decision and not to the amount of time after an article's creation. You should give an article a chance to grow before tagging it. If this is no longer in the policy I will fight to put it back in. For a variety of reasons many people do not write an entire article before saving. Personally, I like to save often when creating a new article and sometime my schedule forces me to quit and come back a few days later. --Gbleem 10:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:SaintJohnandSaintJames.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SaintJohnandSaintJames.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Адам12901 T/C 14:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Rockingham City
Hello there Tamatisk. I didn't have time to complete the Rockingham City article before you read it. However, if you view it now, I'm sure that you'll find that it has been lengthened with facts and history. Thanks. Tuddy

Saint John and Saint James
Re the AfD, I've put on there a couple of suggestions as to how the article might be improved. Specifically, I think you have to be prepared to deal with things that have gone wrong at the school as well as those that have gone right. Obviously in the global scale of things this is never going to be an article of major significance but I think you've made a competent and literate start and I shouldn't like to see it deleted. BTLizard 10:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Pride London
Thanks for your message. Most of the inaccuracies seem to now have been deleted. However the history section remains unclear - there has been a pride march in London since the early seventies, but it has been organised by a diverse range of inidividuals and organisations over the years. "Pride London" has only exisited since 2003. Its been the "fun" of pride events in London to have so many different names... When we have time we can start to edit that section together to give a fuller and more accurate history - but it will probably have to be after this year's event! ;0) Truthmonkey 10:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Natgeologo.gif
Hello Tamatisk, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Natgeologo.gif) was found at the following location: User:Tamatisk. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Whiskeyecho.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Whiskeyecho.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign
A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 22:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lucid.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lucid.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lightning Bear
I have nominated Lightning Bear, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lightning Bear. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Spartaz Humbug! 11:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:P3130031.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:P3130031.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Alphabetization and collation
I am inviting you to comment, in your capacity as a librarian, at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. -- Wavelength (talk) 21:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Jlynnc.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Jlynnc.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:53, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Tamatisk!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 18:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)