User talk:TheMagikCow/archive3

Draft:Goods that are produced by child labor and forced labor
Thank you for your comment. I wanted to let you know that all the information in the article are from reliable sources which are listed in the reference and external links sections; and can be checked for further information on the topic discussed.--Nadya Inoubli (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

AfC
I'm just letting you  know that  your addition  to  WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants has been removed. This is because you do  not  have the required experience. Furthermore, I am surprised at  this considering  the amount of advice you  have already  received about  your editing. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I ave 500 edits and 90 days old. TheMagikCow (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid you only  have 194 edits to  articles. This and the fact  that  you  cannot  read instructions is conclusive evidence that  you  should not  be reviewing  anything. Please neither review articles at  AfC, NPP, or anywhere else. All  reviewing tasks, whatever they  are, require experience.  Thanks.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would nevertheless like to  help  maintain  the quality  of the encyclopedia, when you  have made 200 edits to  mainspace you  are welcome to  consider enrolling  at  the WP:CVUA to learn all about  counter-vandalism. You  would then be able to patrol pages and revert obvious vandalism. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I have reverted your addition to the participants' list. As depicted here you have only 202 mainspace non-deleted edits. We require 500. Further, you have to have a significant understanding of how Wikipedia works in order to be a reviewer at AfC. I don't see any evidence of that. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What evidence do you need for when I have 500 edits? TheMagikCow (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you click on the link in my comment above? That's what we're going to check. Wikipedia automatically records and tallies your edits. When it says you have 500 mainspace edits (look for the part of the pie chart labeled Main) then you'll be ready. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Cy
hello there dont be a jerk! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.6.190 (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Cy
Thank you for correcting my earlier edits, my PC has been catching multiple viruses lately, I meant no intentional vandalism. (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello there. I do doubt this as I have never ever seen a case of thhis reported before. If you hhave evidence report it. Otherwise Please do not harass or attack other people. Also, please sign all comments with four tides (~) Thank you TheMagikCow (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Cy
Where may I report such case so that I am not subject to mistaken consequences, good sir, I apologize for this inconvenience of my viruses. 67.82.6.190 (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Acyus

Big Stick Ideology
yes thank you for changing my error from Big Stick Idealogy

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Cluebot
Hi there. You have been a good perosn before. cluebot has given me warning for being helpful. I have changed. Thanks 80.2.172.185 (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the message. Please could you report the false positive and repeat the edit. Your are liable for any vandalism. Thanks!TheMagikCow (talk) 21:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi TheMagikCow. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Numismatics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volatility. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Church of Google concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Church of Google, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Laura Glading edit
Apologies MagikCow, the edit to the Laura Glading page was my first. An unhappy union member changed the original, correct text on the page using the user name of the Director of Communications for the Association of Professional Flight Attendants. The page was full of false information and opinions that run contrary to public, factual information which is easily available online. I had restored the page to the original, correct version prior to the changes. Can you please change it back? Thank you, RowleyMBirkin
 * ✅ No need to appolosise! Sorry on my behalf and the orginal version is rightly restored. Thank you very much for pointing this out and I hope that you enjoy your time on wikipedia. Just a small pointer, please sign all talk pages with four tides (~) Thank you again! TheMagikCow (talk) 16:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

?
Hi can you confirm what is construed as not constructive. I was adding a well known point of contention that surrounds the song Shot In The Dark. I wasn't being unconstructive I was stating a fact. Apologies if I broke a rule. Regards.
 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Unfortunately you added a 'T' to the start of the page and most of your additions were unsourced content. Next Time please add sources to you facts and thoroughly proof read your article. Also, please sign all talk pages (with four tides(~)) and create a new section at the bottom. Thanks TheMagikCow (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

AfC 2
Hi. I am  not  wholly  convinced that  you  simply  hovering  over your edit  count  until  you  have reached 500 mainspace edits actually  confers you with  the knowlege and experience needed for reviewing. You need to  have fulfilled the other requirements too. Maintenance work of this kind  is not  for newcomers, and joining  Wikipedia with  the sole desire of reviewing  pages at  AfC is questionable. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Magnetic Joe
Hi, can I ask your rationale for accepting this article? There doesn't appear to be any reliable third party sources (WP:RS) included (and these sources, if they exist, would have established notability). I personally would not have accepted it, but maybe you have different ideas. I also wouldn't have given it a C-class, though it's in that area between C and start that's always kind of iffy. From a fellow AfC reviewer... &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 08:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Broken China
Like I stated when I made those edits, every section in Broken China was duplicated. Did I not make myself clear enough, or was I supposed to put an explanation in another place?

138.67.78.206 (talk) 23:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

we're not allowed to talk about it
it being. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Le petit fromage (talk • contribs) 21:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Paul Kimble
I removed the blp prod noticed off of Paul Kimble as there is a link on the side bar-those have happened to me also where I think it is unsourced but there is some ref elsewhere. Just keep that in mind. Wgolf (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Thanks for the pointer!TheMagikCow (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello TheMagikCow. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. -- Sam Sing! 21:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for that information presented in a clear ay that doesnt attack or make someone feel less important. I have taken that on board and will do that in the future. Thank you very much again! TheMagikCow (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Stop your abuse
If you are a human or a bot, stop tagging new articles with a speedy and spamming talk pages one minute after the creation as of now. If you are a human it should be pretty obvious that free software stub instead of software stub was an error on my side with a good chance that I fix it in minute two after creation, and if you are a bot you might find that there are about five incoming links to MKVToolNix, so if I am a spammer you'd need to block me in addition to the speedy. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)