User talk:The Right Honourable

Infobox Currency
Hi,

I see that you're trying to add superunit to the infobox. I fixed what you started. What do you have in mind for superunit besides grand for 1000 USD? --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 09:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Soviet ruble
Hi,

I see that you're trying to split Soviet ruble off from Russian ruble. IMHO, Soviet ruble is the right title name, and Soviet Ruble and Soviet Rouble should redirect to Soviet ruble. I can't move because Soviet ruble and directly copy-and-paste the content is highly discouraged. So I have made the request here and started a discussion. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 10:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Banknote infobox
Hi,

I understand you have the desire of putting banknote infobox out. And as a result, you created Infobox Banknote. However, there was another template Infobox Note that is currently under development. If I have time, I will be working on the infobox, and ultimately, to remove one of the duplicates. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * By the way, you can find a list of useful templates here. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:76-926obverse.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:76-926obverse.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Butseriouslyfolks 09:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Drugbox template names
Hi, interesting idea re list of names, but it needs prior discussion as tehre are various issues raised. Of most note is that drug articles should already be named for the INN, and BAN should follow the INNs. Individual discrepencies for USAN are perhaps best addressed in the article's introduction.

See Template talk:Drugbox for discussion. David Ruben Talk 02:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

drugbox vs. chembox
Indeed, the old chembox is very hard to handle, has some strange problems, and is plainly a page-hog that may scare of people when editing that page. I have been working on chembox new, which is much more sophisticated and works very much like the drugbox (parts of the code are drugbox code). I am still working on parts of the code (want to do some tricks with bp/mp and with the molecular formulae, and there are still some fields that need to be combined). Its design is completely modular, one can choose which modules to use, and which to keep out. Some modules already handle more than shown in chembox new, I think I will write a bit of a manual per module.

IMHO, it would be nice if all chemical compounds would have the same box, people outside chemistry then directly recognise that box, and know what to look for (we have about 4000 chemicals around!). There are now a couple of boxes (on some page some really old ones), most of them broken up, and very hard to maintain. Also, for chemical compounds on the edge of certain fields it is sometimes difficult to decide which box to use. I'd like to hear you opinion on the new box! Hope to see you around. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Adreneline/Epinephrine
I'm not sure if the idea behind the move you did to Adreneline/Epinephrine is going to go over well, but it seems reasonable to me. In any case, it has two problems: -R. S. Shaw 08:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Adrenaline is traditionally spelled adrenaline, not adreneline. The chem diagram has this problem as well as the article title.
 * The move left a number of double-redirects, which need to be fixed since they leave readers using them short of the article.

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Whatever!The Right Honourable 09:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:76-926reverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:76-926reverse.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:76-926reverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:76-926reverse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:76-926obverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:76-926obverse.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:76-926obverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:76-926obverse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Lysergic acid (disambiguation)
I have added a "" template to the article Lysergic acid (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lilac Soul 22:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, why is this here? Newyorkbrad 00:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Because when you add the prod template to a page, it suggests that you inform the person who originally created the page so that they can protest and offer their opinions on the matter.Lilac Soul 15:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 08:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Drug templates
Why are you removing templates from the drug articles? I shall put them back later, unless you can convince me that there is a good reason for their removal. Also, please supply an edit summary for all edits you make. Regards, Colin°Talk 08:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Attack
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot 14:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Retard woman
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Colin°Talk 12:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:British coin 25p (1981) obverse.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:British coin 25p (1981) obverse.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Stifle (talk) 13:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:76-906 11.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:76-906 11.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:British coin 2p (2000)Reverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:British coin 2p (2000)Reverse.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:LSD
Category:LSD, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:British coin 2p (2000)Obverse.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:76-926reverse.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:76-926reverse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086 Talk 04:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:British half new penny obverse.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:British half new penny obverse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086 Talk 04:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Proposed deletion of File:British florin post-1952.jpg


The file File:British florin post-1952.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:British coin 2p (2000)Obverse.jpg


The file File:British coin 2p (2000)Obverse.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

"Isopentyl" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Isopentyl and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)