User talk:TimVickers/archive 10

Informing past contributors of new TFD for Template:Maintained
As you were a contributor in the last TFD, I am letting you know that Maintained is again up for deletion. Please review the current version of the template and discuss it at the TFD. Thanks! &mdash; BRIAN 0918 • 2008-01-30 17:48Z

Barnstar
It was a while ago, but I haven't forgotten.  :)

ref:deletion Satish Babu
Hi, The page Satish Babu was deleted on 13th of February.It was about the contributions of a journalist to the Regional Media. Can you let me know how it could find relevance and where i can find the deleted page? User:Madhuritalluri(talk)

Admiration
I admire your image works !

Thanks!
thank you very much!!! You´ve been very useful, keep in touch! blitox

RfA Thanks
 A message from Warthog  Demon.

Barnstar
Moved to trophy cabinet.

Thanks!
Moved to trophy cabinet

Well done
Moved to trophy cabinet.

For your help on Pulmonary contusion
Moved to trophy cabinet

Smile!


A NobodyMy talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Barnstar
Moved to trophy cabinet

Glutathione-ascorbate cycle
Dear Tim, thanks for your support and contribution for the article. I will include a section about the physiological role of the cycle in plants. You might want to have a look at the other article on roGFP I started; since my English is rather poor and I am new in the community you might have some helpful comments for this one as well.

Cheers, Laurent $olanum

Reincarnation research
moved.

Main page appearance
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on January 10, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/January 10, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director,. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tb hotch  ™ and © 20:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

 

The Archaea are a group of single-celled microorganisms. They have no cell nucleus or any other membrane-bound organelles within their cells. In the past they were viewed as an unusual group of bacteria, but since the Archaea have an independent evolutionary history and show many differences in their biochemistry from other forms of life, they are now classified as a separate domain in the three-domain system. In this system the phylogenetically distinct branches of evolutionary descent are the Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya. Archaea are further divided into four recognized phyla, but many more phyla may exist. Of these groups the Crenarchaeota and the Euryarchaeota are most intensively studied. Classification is still difficult, since the vast majority have never been studied in the laboratory. Archaea and bacteria are quite similar in size and shape, although a few archaea have very unusual shapes. Despite this visual similarity to bacteria, archaea possess genes and several metabolic pathways that are more closely related to those of eukaryotes: notably the enzymes involved in transcription and translation. Initially, archaea were seen as extremophiles that lived in harsh environments, such as hot springs and salt lakes, but they have since been found in a broad range of habitats, including soils, oceans, and marshlands. Archaea are now recognized as a major part of Earth's life and may play roles in both the carbon cycle and the nitrogen cycle. (more...)

Missing you
Hi Tim. The MCB project is not the same without you. Your high quality contributions to Wikipedia are sorely missed. First and foremost, I hope you are doing well. Second, I do understand that real life takes priority.

I hope that you can drop us a short note. I and I am sure others would love to hear from you. Wishing you the best. Boghog (talk) 13:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey there, thanks for the note. I'm still around, but with a student to supervise and a grant to write, so I have very little free time at the moment. I hope to return to Wiki at some point in the future. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Great! I am relieved to hear from you and good luck on your grant proposal.  Cheers.  Boghog (talk) 21:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Evolution
Hi Tim. happy New Year. I hope you are well, and around. If you are, I think this would be a good time for you to take fifteen or twenty minutes and make a comment on the most recent discussion about revising the lead of the Evolution article. Best, Slrubenstein  |  Talk 23:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC) PS good luck with the grant proposal.

Haloarchaea
This article seems to duplicate Halobacteria, which seems to be the accepted scientific name. Thoughts on merging? The discussion is at Talk:Haloarchaea. --EncycloPetey (talk) 04:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Editor assistance list
Hello. Since your account has recently not been editing very regularly, on the page Editor assistance/list you name has been moved to a list of editors who are willing to give assistance, but may not always be available. There is an explanation at Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list. You are, of course, welcome to move yourself back to the other list if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Archea
So, I sent my dad, who enjoys bloviating about various topics, to read Archea before he annoyed me to death with questions that aren't even wrong. He had this to say: "Read the article and agree that it was worthy of being featured. Well written, logical and at a level where people without detailed knowledge of biology could get something useful from it. Wikipedia rocks!"

Thought that you might appreciate that. PS. How does one join the pro-felid cabal? --Danger (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Problematic edit: incorrect DOI added to Glutathione disulfide
Hi. In this edit you added a citation to with. The DOI is incorrect for the paper. Was this a one off mistake, or is there an external data source or larger list of edits/articles that need checking? [I noticed because the articles on Amino acid, Antioxidant and Glutathione reductase cite the same PMID.] Thanks Rjwilmsi  22:32, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I think that was a one-off mistake. I usually use the diberri tool to generate citations templates, and this PMID doesn't return a DOI automatically in that tool, so I guess I added the DOI manually. Tim Vickers (talk) 22:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, no worries. Thanks Rjwilmsi  23:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Viruses is back
Hello, We at WikiProject Viruses noticed that you used to be a participant of the project before the project went inactive. We would like to take this opportunity to invite you to become a participant of WikiProject Viruses again. We believe that viruses are an extremely important part of an encyclopedia, and that is why we need you! Our new project coordinator is. We hope you seriously consider our invitation. See you there. If you are interested in joining our crew again, please place a notice on Our Talkpage, or you will be removed from our participants list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 21:29, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

coenzyme
Hey, I noticed you were the one that blanked the coenzyme page. It was very confusing when I followed a link through coenzyme and found out that cofactors had to be non-proteins. I think we should either bring coenzyme back or make cofactor cover coenzymes. Otherwise all the proteins that bind to other proteins to catalyze reactions are in la-la land. Lepidoptera (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

"Hi there" User:Guswen/Lukaszyk-Karmowski metric
Dear Tim, Two years ago, you voted for userfying the article about my PhD thesis at the Wikipedia []. At his time there were no "three or more independent groups of mathematicians" working on this concept. Recently I found some new independent references (book, PhD thesis, article) to this metric which in my opinion justify its presence at Wikipedia mainspace. Besides most authors cite [] which is odd since the metric indication has been left there though there is no definition provided in the mainspace. I will appreciate your opinion about moving this article back to the mainspace. Thank you and take care, Szymon Guswen (talk) 12:54, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Invitation for a short research survey
Hi, I am a PhD student at Carnegie Mellon University doing some research into editing and reverts on Wikipedia. I am asking Wikipedians that I have found are active in the biological sciences on Wikipedia to complete a short survey that will help me develop interfaces and tools for newcomers and administrators. The survey will take about 10-15 minutes, and will involve you pretending that you are editing the page on genetic engineering and making some quick judgments on how controversial or likely to be reverted a word sampled from an edit might be. This will help me to validate a model that predicts which words will be reverted based on the history of an article, which if successful will be turned into an interface to help with Wikipedia editing and encourage newcomers. If you would like to participate, please complete the survey on SurveyMonkey here. You can find out more about me on my user page and personal home page. I'm more than happy to talk more about this research on my talk page or by email, and thank you for your time. JeffRz (talk) 03:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Marshall protocol
Hi Tim,

You're not too busy on wiki these days, but I thought I'd metion this anyway - I just did some editing with extreme prejudice at Trevor Marshall, of the Marshall protocol "fame" (famous for breeding antibiotic resistant bacteria maybe). If you are interested in taking a look, I'd love the review. Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 14:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Wiknic in St. Louis this weekend
Details have been finalized for the second Wikipedia meetup in St. Louis, happening at 12:00 noon this Saturday at Forest Park.--Chaser (talk) 20:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Tuberculosis' FAR
nominated Tuberculosis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 17:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Tree of life with genome size.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tree of life with genome size.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on September 5, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/September 5, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors or his delegate, or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  19:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

 

Metabolism is the set of chemical reactions that happen in living organisms to maintain life. These processes allow organisms to grow and reproduce, maintain their structures, and respond to their environments. The chemical reactions of metabolism are organized into metabolic pathways, in which one chemical is transformed through a series of steps into another chemical, by a sequence of enzymes. Enzymes are crucial to metabolism because they allow organisms to drive desirable reactions that require energy and will not occur by themselves, by coupling them to spontaneous reactions that release energy. As enzymes act as catalysts they allow these reactions to proceed quickly and efficiently. Enzymes also allow the regulation of metabolic pathways in response to changes in the cell's environment or signals from other cells. The metabolism of an organism determines which substances it will find nutritious and which it will find poisonous. The speed of metabolism, the metabolic rate, also influences how much food an organism will require. (more...)

FAR
nominated Encyclopædia Britannica for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Snowman (talk) 13:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Chiropractic/Admin log
(N.B. I also posted this to admins User:Mbisanz, User:Lifebaka, User:Elonka and User:KillerChihuahua earlier today) Hello there, you are listed as an interested admin on Talk:Chiropractic/Admin log. Firstly, a declaration of interest: I proposed deletion of the page here (which was unsuccessful), and my name appears on the page as an editor that has been warned of sanctions.<BR /> The page is stale. If this page is to remain I think it should be maintained. As such, could you please either: or Many thanks, --Surturz (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Remove your name from the page, if you do not want to maintain the page
 * 1) Update or delete the "Other recent editors" section. I would suggest deleting it, and
 * 2) Delete the "No action by admins" section by User:QuackGuru. This editor has been topic banned for one year, and that section was disruption by him, and
 * 3) Remove "Shell Kinney" from the list of uninvolved admins. I believe she has retired from Wikipedia, and (done by Lifebaka)
 * 4) Include a wikilink for each warning given in the "Editors notified of restrictions" section with the date the notification was given.

Hi I'm new to wikipedia and i want to translate [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CollapsedtreeLabels-simplified.svg this file to my language to put it in wikipedia masri how does this work? thanks, oh btw loki is so cute :) --Kid 007 (talk) 13:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

In case you have a free nanosecond.....
See Talk:Science as there is a push to buff Science to GA/FA level. For some reason only beknown to the almighty (or flying spaghetti monster) I have ended up trying to coordinate this. Anyway, if time is really limited, any input on the interface/coverage betwixt science and natural science would be gratefully received....Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:09, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Merge of "tau protein kinase" / "GSK-3beta" articles?
Hi, as I don't know where to ask, I write to you... I think that tau protein kinase http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tau-protein_kinase and GSK-3 beta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSK-3beta is the same protein, as stated in the list of synomyms of tau protein kinase. Unfornately, I didn't found a Uniprot identifier to compare with GSK-3beta. (And in GSK-3 article, there is a link for tau protein kinase.) But I'm not sure enough and even don't know how to merge the pages. May you forward the question to a specialist? Sorry not to be logged in, but it seems that I only can log in fr.wikipedia. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Pmuller_addal Regards, Pascal 92.103.127.34 (talk) 12:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry for butting in here, but there are at least four different humans proteins with tau-protein kinase activity (BRSK1, BRSK2, GSK3A, GSK3B). Logically if GSK3B were merged, then BRSK1, BRSK12, and GSK3A would also need to merged into tau-protein kinase. Given the sizes of the infoboxes in these articles, I don't think the proposed merger is practical. Boghog (talk) 15:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * TimVickers has not edited since July, so without "butting in" there is likely to be no response at all. Looie496 (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm not around much. However, I do tend to watch my talkpage. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Aha! Looie496 (talk) 15:41, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Question
Dear Dr Vickers

I came across this web site: []

It is a wiki based metabolic pathway modeling system. As the director of the MCB project on WP, it occurred to me (perhaps incorrectly) that this might be of interest both to yourself and to wikipedia in general. The interface uses the Google Maps API which will be familiar to many people. IMHO this looks replicable for more than just B. subtilis.

I would appreciate your opinion.

Disclaimer: I have no association with the aforementioned website nor are any of the developers or authors personally known to me.

DrMicro (talk) 11:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

Immune system
Hi Tim. I notice from its history that you were involved with this article when it passed WP:FAC. It has recently been significantly changed and I was wondering if you might be interested in glancing at it. The talk page discussion is here. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

I use some of your photos
Hi Tim!

I have use some photos of Dracaena guianensis and Babyrousa babyrussa in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directy in the follow links and clicks over button "Siguiente":

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=32493 http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=32575

If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Tim%20Vickers

This is my "contributor card", for example: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison ( talk )

File:Nucleotides v2.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nucleotides v2.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

File:4-deoxypyridoxine.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:4-deoxypyridoxine.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 13:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Alkermes (company) article
Dear Tim,

This article, which I contributed to, has a "close paraphrasing" template on it. I made changes to address that concern. Could you possibly look over the article and let me know if my changes have been sufficient to warrant removal of the template? Thanks!Michael Leeman (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikiproject Virus Revival
You have previously shown an interest in Wikiproject Viruses by adding your name to our List of Participants. We are currently reviving the project, and would be grateful if you could indicate whether you are still interested in contributing or not on our Talk Page. You do not need to have expertise in virology to contribute to our project, as we welcome people with any degree of knowledge of the subject. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 17:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC).

Evolution re-edit
Thanks for your feedback, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Autonova#Evolution, just noticed it! Keep up the great work :) (note: please allow four years for replies to be sent) Autonova (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear TimVickers,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.115.210 (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Donna Eden
You may be interested to know that there's a new AFD discussion on this topic: Articles for deletion/Donna Eden (2nd nomination). I'm mentioning this to you because I note that you took part in previous discussions about the notability/verifiability of this article. --Salimfadhley (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Tuberculosis
I am working on getting this article to GA. Wondering if you are interested in helping as I see you where a major contributor in the past. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Glycemic efficacy
How are you? If you or you know anybody who can expand this let them know!♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Graft update
Wondering if you could update this graft http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TB_incidence.png with this data http://who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2011/gtbr11_main.pdf Otherwise I will figure it out in a couple of weeks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Liverpool Care Pathway
Hi. You did a fantastic job a couple of years ago sorting out our article on the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient. An editor has recently added a "Controversy" section, (diff) making some rather sensationalist allegations based largely on an article in the Daily Mail. has tagged the new section as POV, and writes on my talk page that he sees the edits "are already being used as polemic fodder".

This is without question a topic which can be very sensitive, and needs us to lay out the issues carefully, from the best sources. I was therefore wondering if you could find time to look at these latest edits, and again apply your abilities and experience to sort it out. Jheald (talk) 17:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Aabomycin
Can you add to this? I salvaged it from speedy. Albomycin might be the other name and have more hits.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis!


Dust off your Polaroid camera and pack your best lenses. The first-ever Wikipedia Takes St. Louis photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, at 12:30pm in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 14:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello
This may interest you. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 12:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

The Missouri Botanical Garden needs help!
Hi Tim! The Missouri Botanical Garden is currently working on the Art of Life project, which might build a very useful collaboration with the Wikimedia Commons. They're currently working on creating computer software which can identify the hundreds of thousands of illustrations in the 39 million pages scanned and published online by the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL). The identified illustrations are going to be pretty metadata-poor: the BHL only has bibliographic information on each book, and won't be able to add much more information to the images. The BHL is thinking about uploading those illustrations which are in the public domain to the Commons, where they could be used to illustrate Wikipedia articles and (hopefully!) have additional metadata added to them.

I worked with the BHL over the summer preparing the groundwork for this process, including setting up a collaboration page, setting up a category and creating a template for BHL metadata. But the next step -- building bridges between the BHL and the Commons -- is going to be critical, and I'd really appreciate your help in making that happen. User:Marcus Qwertyus suggested that you might be interested! If you are, please join us on our new mailing list!

If you have any other questions or feedback, please get in touch on my talk page or. -- Gaurav (talk) 20:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

NIH
Hey Tim. Am going to be speaking at the NIH here in a week. Hopeful to restart what you began in 2009. Hope to see you editing more :-) Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I also wanted to inform you of this as I am participating also. I am in touch with User:Wadewitz for advice based on how things went last time and if you want any input in this at any point then we all would be interested in whatever you had to share. Thanks.  Blue Rasberry    (talk)   17:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Mike Alder, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 15:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

ATP vs ATP ratio
In the article on Adenosine triphosphate, it stated that the ATP to ADP ratio is thousandfold. This was added 13 August 2007 and has survived for almost six years without being corrected. I would think the misconception comes from the large difference between free energy of hydrolysis at standard state vs under physiological conditions. It is true that under physiological conditions, the reaction quotient Q is very different from 1 (which would be standard conditions). The reason is that ATP, ADP and phophate are all present at millimolar concentrations. The ratio of ATP and ADP is close to one (5:1 approximately). These concentrations are in the denominator and numerator of the equilibrium expression, and almost cancel out. However, phosphate is in the numerator as well, and is much smaller than standard state (by a factor of about 200). Overall, you get a Q that is quite small (on the order of 1/1000), and a correction of the free energy of RT ln Q, which is approximately 2.5 kJ/mol * ln (1/1000) = 2.5 kJ/mol * (-6ish) = -15 kJ/mol.

Theislikerice (talk) 04:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

File:77-cm primate cage.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:77-cm primate cage.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 19:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

File:77-cm primate cage.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:77-cm primate cage.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:02, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

* Southern limit of the distribution of the green anaconda
Good evening:

Please allow me to share an article with you. Maybe you will find it interesting:

http://www.naturapop.com/home/southern-limit-of-the-distribution-of-the-green-anaconda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.2.207.74 (talk) 00:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:77-cm primate cage.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:77-cm primate cage.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I use some of your photos
¡Hello Tim!

I have use a photo of Babyrousa celebensis, some of Dracaena guianensis and one of Ophiophagus hannah from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow links and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=32493

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=32575

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=37015

I have also taken the liberty of summarizing your profile in wikipedia and your photo, for your contributor profile in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Tim+Vickers

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!!

Regards!

Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk) 16:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

File:77-cm primate cage.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:77-cm primate cage.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Million Award
The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

File:77-cm primate cage.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:77-cm primate cage.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Amino acid zwitterions.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amino acid zwitterions.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File:77-cm primate cage.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:77-cm primate cage.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments re: Steroids page
I am a US academic that is leaving the Steroids editing fold after too much wasted effort. In a survey of the Talk, you will find me the one providing outside comparisons of our content, being hard-nosed over the lack of citations, making lists of suggestions/omissions (history, chemical synthesis, pharmacology, etc.), and then engaging in the battle with the entrenched other chemistry editor (e.g., over conformational dynamics, him saying "they're rigid", me saying "it's more complicated than that"). The serial suggestion-making began after I gave up on the thought of actual content contributions, since the tags I wrote to call attention to lack of referencing, need for review of the images, and the broad need for expert attention were edited, then removed wholesale.

As an article that is under one of your Project's umbrellas, I would note that while Steroid has solid though somewhat narrow-leaning chemistry expertise [(no secosteroid mention, no partial and total synthesis, no conformational analysis (see Nobels)], it direly needs biological and higher level attention. There is no mention of nuclear/steroid receptors in the article, for goodness sake, no mention of the major roles of inhaled and injectable steroids, and spotty coverage of the actual breadth of steroid roles in vivo and across the Kingdoms. Hence, it's biochemical, pharmacologic, and related biological sections are a shambles.

Moreover, its general appearance is that of a sandbox—much more always a "work in progress" than anything very useful at a given point in time. The unshakeable difference in editor perspectives between Boghog and myself on this—that I don't believe headings should appear without text, or that filler text should be created off top of head and placed in articles without references, assuming that they might be added later (even when such filling is done by experts like he and I), or that earlier citation-free text should be allowed to stand after 3-6 months—is what is leading me to leave the article.

In my experience, presence of low quality begets low quality content insertions, while the opposite is also true. My suggestion is that all the unreferenced text, empty headings, etc. (in essence, the article as a whole) be replaced by a shorter, uniform higher-quality, pithy article drawn from current content, that can thereafter be expanded based on a Talk-agreed upon outline. This suggestion has been rejected in Steroid Talk by Bohog (who is current most active editor). Were he persuadable, at any level, things might move forward. At this juncture, his daily presence and confidence and quickness to retain the status quo (at a high level) keeps the article as it is. I would say, he owns it.

The fact that solid edits—e.g., removing two stray sentences on microbial processing of steroids from a total chemical synthesis section—are reverted in drive-bys, then re-reverted, etc. ... leads one with any knowledge of solid academic content (and any real life time constraints) to wikipedial despair. You may know how to express leadership in this Wild West. If there is a significant change in appearance and mode of operation, I will return there and edit. Apart form some evidence of such a major change in "attititude" at that article, there is no practical point in my trying to contributing. Cheers. LeProf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.179.92.36 (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I rewrote the lead to the article on natural product if you wish to see what I can accomplish quickly if game playing can be avoided. LeProf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.179.92.36 (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:77-cm primate cage.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:77-cm primate cage.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

GA reassessment: History of malaria
History of malaria, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sbalfour (talk) 02:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Collapsed tree cropped.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

You might have a brief look here
...at the edit proposal I made, here. If there are typos in the proposed edits, feel free and correct. (It is late, and I was working fast.) Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 09:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

A highly resolved Tree of Life
Hi Tim,

The diagram you created seems incomplete, there being more forks than labels. Is there another version somewhere with the missing labels? Protozoa for instance have four forks.

Perhaps though it's simply that there is a genetic differentiation between the forks but as yet no labels to match all of these.

BTW I like you observation about doing favours for people. Two problems. The first is that calling them in is not a trivial task, the other that favours seem to only accrue value to a certain critical amount before their value collapses, sometimes almost entirely. People don't like people who make them feel in debt.

All the best, especially with the Leishmaniasis project.

LookingGlass (talk) 08:16, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

FAR
I have nominated Enzyme for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Jarodalien (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Tim, long time no see! I had wandered back here a couple of weeks ago to clean up some odd nomenclature issues with the ribonuclease articles, and then the enzyme FAR popped up on my watchlist. I cleaned out some of the creeping cruft, often by restoring sections of your more tightly written 2006 version. Anyway, good to see you pop in! Opabinia regalis (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (jaw)  @ 16:05, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

MCB main page email contact
Hi. I'm doing a bit of an update fo the WP:MCB main page. Do you still want your email to be one of the main contact links listed? T.Shafee(Evo&#65120;Evo)talk 10:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Carl Neuberg.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Carl Neuberg.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

cite pmid is not longer working
Just a note that the cite pmid is no longer bot expanded and is no longer supported. There is a discussion of completely deleting it. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 17:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Antigen capture assay.png
Thanks for uploading File:Antigen capture assay.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Collapsed Tree Labels svg
Hi Tim

I am writing to you as the author of the Collapsedtreelabels diagram because ... err ... that diagram would appear to require some minor changes to the labels.. I am not qualified to do much about this (and don't know how to change the diagram even if I were).

My story is that when I checked a diagram on the taxonomy article that details the development of biological taxonomy, against your diagram .. I fell down a rabbit hole. Chromista isn't on your diagram and, on the Algae and Slime mold pages, I found that both are polyphyletic groups, elements of which are not "closely related". Algae is classified on its page as both Eukaryota and Bacteria which confused me so, assuming that Algae SHOULD be in Eukaryota I crawled deeper, got lost, and ... well here I am!

So, what I seem to have found is the following:-

Algae and Slime mold are "informal terms" meaning the terms are catch-alls to contain life forms that are considered (?) to date not to have been "satisfactorily" placed into currently accepted taxonomy. It seems that Algae and Slime Molds may fit somehow somewhere into the old Protista kingdom that has now (?) been divided into the Protozoa and Chromista kingdoms in the Eukaryota domain yet some algae also fit into the domain of Bacteria. In your diagram therefore, the kingdom labels Algae and Slime mold do not seem to "belong".

Anyway, even though I am unable to get to the bottom of it there seem to be two simple alternatives. The first is to delete the references to Algae and Slime mold in your diagram as they aren't comparable to the other kingdoms shown under Eukaryota. The second is to delete the term Algae, add the kingdom Chromista (which would cover some algae), and then either delete Slime mold or introduce another domain for it (would that include Obelia?). I guess adding a "domain" would be heresy but to me it seems unreasonable for those-who-know to leave it to lay people to sort out the confusion (if they have they will!). In my opinion (and particularly on Wiki) knowledge complexity/depth should be gradated i.e readers shouldn't be asked to go from, for instance, your diagram straight into the depths of cutting edge taxonomy with no intermediate stops along the way.

Although I think I now understand it's taken me hours/days to figure out what in the end seems simple. Personally I think it's important to do something so as others do not need to go through this. Your diagram is widely cited (for good reason) and it seems there is no reason that greater clarity and simplicity could not readily be achieved. If your diagram were clarified with respect to the anomalous Algae/Slime mold thing then the other articles could relatively easily be harmonised without either any loss to their integrity or any claim being inferred that scientific knowledge is anything but an ongoing process of discovery ad description.

I'd be grateful of your advice and comments. Apologies for the length of this!

LookingGlass (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux  Talk 15:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * These are occasionally useful, so I've made an Afd close. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Adenosine triphosphate
Adenosine triphosphate, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. I know you don't edit here much, but I saw a contribution from 2017, so you never know. AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 22:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Better source request for File:One gene, one enzyme.gif
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:One gene, one enzyme.gif

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:03, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Good day
I saw your edit to WP:AN and excitedly clicked your contributions to see if you're back to more active editing. I hope you're well! -- Laser brain  (talk)  17:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Just fine, but hugely busy, so sadly not. Just checking in. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Virus taxoboxes
Hi, I wonder if you could comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Viruses, as I'd like some more input.

In brief, the issue is that until recently, virus taxoboxes almost always had a virus group as the top level, as per [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virgaviridae&oldid=867174543 this version]. However, in the ICTV 2018 system, taxa from family upwards have members in more than one virus group, so this approach often doesn't work. An alternative is as per [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virgaviridae&oldid=871702585 this version], where the top level is just "Virus" and the virus group doesn't appear in the taxobox. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:46, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Burst phase.png


The file File:Burst phase.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "png of graph that is represented by a better SVG file on commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> <span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular"> <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> <div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:One gene, one enzyme.gif


The file File:One gene, one enzyme.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

"Alliminuim" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alliminuim. Since you had some involvement with the Alliminuim redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

"Alliminuim" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alliminuim. Since you had some involvement with the Alliminuim redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ComplexRational (talk) 15:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ColorChromo.png


The file File:ColorChromo.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Wondering if this link would be correct

 * THanks Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 09:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * As the Ki values refer to receptor binding and not enzyme inhibition, I think your redirect is appropriate. The target section of the redirect was not as clear as it could be, so I have edited a bit and hopefully it is now a bit clearer. Boghog (talk) 11:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Evolution4


A tag has been placed on Template:Evolution4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheImaCow (talk) 13:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sandy Georgia (Talk)  02:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Evolution4


A tag has been placed on Template:Evolution4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheImaCow (talk) 13:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sandy Georgia (Talk)  02:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Evolution4
Template:Evolution4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --TheImaCow (talk) 16:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Ether lipid.png ERROR ?
H SHOULD BE ON LEFT SIDE OF C NOT RIGHT SIDE == H-C-O-C NOT C-H-O-C == ETHER BOND IS C-O-C NOT H-O-C ==

JOE SUPPLE BRUNS (talk) 08:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Request for peer review help
Hi TimVickers! I hope you are doing well and staying safe during these times! Apologize to bother and posting a random request. I have just started to work on a stub (Fontainea Venosa)and had added some sections. Knowing your expertise, I would love if you can help me to review and left a comment on what I can do to improve my edits. Would you be able to help me to provide feedback to further improve the article to reach B class hopefully? But no pressure if you are busy. That is completely fine and understandable :) Hope to hear from you soon. The article is Fontainea Venosa

Thank you so much :) Sparklingkull (talk) 09:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Whale legs.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Whale legs.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗ plicit  12:53, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

"Introduction to DNA" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Introduction to DNA and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:36, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

A friend's advice on Cyclol?
Hi Tim, here's Willow, writing across an ocean of time. I hope you're doing well!

If (and only if!) you have a moment to spare, I would appreciate a sincere, objective criticism of Cyclol, which is now up for Featured Article review. I'm sure you'll see areas of improvement that I miss. Thanks!

That aside, we should catch up; it's been too long! :) Fond hellos from Germany, Willow (talk) 23:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Enzyme inhibitor FAR
I have nominated Enzyme inhibitor for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 23:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award for Enzyme inhibitor
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Enzyme inhibitor/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  03:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 08:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Intra-organelle fluid The "cytosol" article defines cytosol as excluding fluid inside organelles. I can't find ANYWHERE what the fluid inside organelles is called. 2602:306:BC65:42B9:81A1:34FD:A843:814A (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 01:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 18:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 11:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux  Talk 01:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux  Talk 03:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Amino acid
Amino acid has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Antibody
Antibody has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Enzyme inhibitor, introduced (in 2006): "This article tries to provide a reasonably complete account of the types of enzyme inhibitors, how they are investigated and why they are important."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Bacteria scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Bacteria article has been scheduled to rerun as today's featured article for April 27, 2023. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page blurb, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/April 30, 2023, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. If you wish to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article, you can do so at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 2023.

I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - <i style="font-family:arial;color:green">talk to me?</i> 07:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Bacteria, introduced (in 2006): "Bacteria are a core topic in biology, medicine, biochemistry and biotechnology. The article is intended to be a wide introduction to a general audience, but still contain sufficient detail to be comprehensive." -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)