User talk:TonyTheTiger/Archive 39

NCAA pre-season polls
It seems that 2009–10 NCAA Division I men's basketball rankings is focussed on the two big polls (AP and Coaches) and that the other publications' rankings fits better on this page: 2009–10 NCAA Division I men's basketball season —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chitown03 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Millennium Park articles
Hi Tony, I would be more interested in Pritzker Pavilion as it has many similarities to BP Bridge. I am pretty busy in real life and here right now, so I will do my best to help with it, but don't want to commit myself 100% right now. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 14:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Burr Ridge
"This is an assembly of notable stores and it seems to fit in with the other centers at Chicagomalls." So basically you're arguing inherited notability (which is a crock) and WP:OSE. Like that's gonna hold water. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Oct. 1st, 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.252.146.130 (talk) 20:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Can I have permission from you to use your picture of the Jay Pritzker Pavilion on our Newsletter for Administrative Professionals. Our Newsletter is called Professionally Speaking and this would make an awesome header for us.

Please advise asap to jhaney1@sympatico.ca

Thanks J

Crown Fountain
Congratulations, Tony, on Crown Fountain making FA status!

I need to tell you, I have been going through some difficult real-world stuff (which will continue for some time) and simply cannot get online to edit. But I occasionally will check my watchlist on my cell phone while commuting. (It's horribly slow, but when you've got 90 minutes with nothing to do, what the heck?) Anyway, on my way home tonight I looked at the Signpost and saw that you got Crown Fountain to FA status. I know that this is probably no big deal for you, since you have done this more than anyone else, but it's the first time I've been cognizant of an article going through the process, so I decided to get online and congratulate you. Good job! Un sch  ool  02:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, Tony, I just pulled up some diffs, and I've got a question for you. I won't be hurt if you laugh at my silliness or are offended by my nerve.  Anyway, when I look at the alterations I made in the lead, they appear from the diff to be significant; when I compare the lead as I left it to the lead that made it as an FA, there's no significant difference (other than a rewritten caption on a picture), meaning that the lead remained in the form I left it.  This is my question:  That's not enough for me to lay claim to be a person who helped this article make it to FA, is it?  Assuming it is not, what kind of help qualifies one to lay claim to having helped an article to FA?  Getting sources?  What else?  Thanks, you know how ignorant I am about all this.   Un  sch  ool  04:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

IL state parks
I'm hoping to watch races at Rockford Speedway this Sunday. Depending on the time, I may visit Rock Cut State Park for some pictures - it's less than 1 mile away from the track. Is there an admission charge for Illinois state parks, especially for someone from out of state like me? Please respond here on your talk page.  Royal broil  03:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Illinois Beach State Park had no admission as of three years ago. I do not know about other state parks and about current policies.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's what I thought. I had been to Illinois Beach State Park in the early 2000s with my brother and I don't remember an admission charge. I didn't see mention of an admission charge on the IL DNR website.  Royal broil  03:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

at WP:TFAR
You should look at the discussion, and you might want to withdraw the highway and nominate Fountain of Time in its place. I'm not sure of the points, or how others view this. My motivation is that I don't want a war article for Remembrance Day.

BTW, I couldn't find a free pix of Cecil Fielder or Mark Fidrych, so Al Kaline will have to do. Smallbones (talk) 15:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

GA
Are you ok w/the comments I added at the GA? Just touched on the sorts of things I have run into when seeking GAs. Feel free to delete any you think are off.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Importance proof of concept
Latest tagging run is done. By the way, see and Category:Automatically prioritized Indiana articles for an idea of how importance could be set by bot. –xenotalk 02:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Barry Bonds?
I noticed you had done a lot of work on the Barry Bonds article last year. Are you still working on it, or taking a break? I don't want to finish the work on helping get it ready for GA status without contacting the other editors. --DizFreak talk Contributions 07:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the offer on Bonds. Once I get some of the horrible stuff corrected, I will let you know and at that time would really appreciate your help. --DizFreak talk Contributions 06:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Feel free to help with Bonds. I won't complain!  I was under the impression that you weren't interested.  I always prefer to work with another who has more experience getting articles to GA status.  I'll catch you over on that talk page.  BTW, there is link to the work I'm doing on my userpage. --DizFreak talk Contributions 03:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Danita Angell


The article Danita Angell has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no significant claim of notability, no indications that article may be meaningfully expanded -- short career, handful of GNews hits in captions

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Since you're a memeber of WP:WikiProject Architecture
Could you add some information to Contemporary architecture for general readers? As seeing the article in such the "poor" status (visiting the page to get some info but NOTHING in there), I was browsing the project member list, and recalled you're frequent a FA contributer. I want to contribute to the article, but that is not my field. It would be a great benefit for having your contribution to the article. Thanks.--Caspian blue 21:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

 * New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
 * Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
 * News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:33, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Bob Marley
Hi Tony, when your not busy please have another look at the state of the Bob Marley article now, ta. Off2riorob (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Respect, thanks for your work Tony. Off2riorob (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Wistert
now that you got the link

and saw Al get inducted - with Randall Cunningham

why won't you fix my edits that you took off?

plus, you really need to include how Al brought the stand up blocking we all see in the NFL today into the NFL with the Steagles

it is respect for Al and teaching kids their history

as far as the few sites that claim he missed so many games = Al never missed a game, was a 60 minute man, and only missed one start after the 5th game of his rookie year (when he replaced Ted Doyle as the starter)

it was against the Browns because of a bad ankle, but he ended up playing most of the game anyways

that is worth mentioning as well

Al is a better source of info than that of the hearsay of websites run by regular joes, since facts are so important...right?

hoping to hear a positive response back from you

since you have yet to reply to my previous message of proof Al finally got his respect, which I had asked you to chill, wait, and see

if you had = all of this would have been avoided —Preceding unsigned comment added by AFOS4EVER (talk • contribs) 05:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

again, here
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/sports/20090928_Cunningham__Wistert_inducted_into_Eagles_Honor_Roll.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by AFOS4EVER (talk • contribs) 08:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

question
Will you please restore the edits I made on Al Wistert??

for example,on this sentence, "His number 70 was retired by the Eagles in 1952."

It could read "His number 70 was retired by the Eagles in 1952 when the Eagles honored him with a day called Al Wistert Day. Al was the first Eagle to ever have his jersey retired by the team."

Which also could be used in the first paragraph where it says he was the first Eagle to be a Pro Bowl player. It could say he was the first Eagle to ever have his jersey retired by the team,and the first Eagle to go to the Pro Bowl.

You can decide.

I also would REALLY like the fact that Al brought the stand up style of blocking used today into the NFL.

He was the first to ever do it.

This is an important and historic moment in the life of the NFL.

you need at least these facts included on his page to give him proper respect, as well as educate people.

Isn't this the intent of Wikipedia?

here is a link giving you his whole career, much of it told by Al himself.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/261684-this-sunday-the-philadelpia-eagles-find-respect-for-history/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by AFOS4EVER (talk • contribs) 01:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Mike Kafka
Hey Tony, Giants27 and I are currently working on bringing Mike Kafka up to Good Article status, and we were wondering if you could help us out. Neither of us could find a free image of Kafka and since neither of us live near Illinois, we cannot take a picture of him. Would you (or your WP:CHICAGO buddies) happen to have a free image of him, or would you be willing to go to a Northwestern game to take a picture of him?  Eagles   24/7   (C)  19:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I have already tried the Flickr route, and failed.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  20:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Well that's a bummer. Thanks anyways.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  20:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Tony, As you know, Indiana is finished with use of default Importance parameters and Xeno would like to know if we are ready to go forward. Are you ready? Pknkly (talk) 04:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

The link to the discussion you started is at the talk page. Good morn to you, I'm calling it a day. Pknkly (talk) 07:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

More discussion. Hope you are ready. Pknkly (talk) 15:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

CfD notification
Hey there, a category you created, Category:Vogue navigational boxes, is being considered to be merged into another category. Feel free to take part of the discussion, which can be found here. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  06:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Big East and WAC college football pages
you left me a message a while back saying that I have the editorial intrest to create pages for the Big East and the WAC to help fill the template of conference seasons for the 2009 season. THANK YOU!! because of that I did go ahead an create a WAC page and time willing and if nobody dose if before me I will create a Big East page and any other confernce that dose not have a page yet. My main focus is to get each teams pages as up to date as possible so it may be some time before I get to the Big East page but hopefully I get there. I just want to say thank you for letting me know. It meant a lot and gave me something to do for a while.Bsuorangecrush (talk) 09:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Kenwood Map
Just saw your message re the Kenwood Map. Not sure how I concluded that the boundaries were wrong Sorry for deleting. --Sjsilverman (talk) 23:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

 * From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
 * Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
 * Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
 * News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
 * Dispatches: Sounds
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

2009 Big Ten Conference football season
TonyTheTiger, thanks for reaching out regarding the 2009 Big Ten Conference football season article. Not sure if I have the patience to deal with filling out the schedule right now, but I'll see if I can chip in, although if I'm going to build schedule tables, I'd rather work on building out the yearly Michigan ones before 1969. While we're on the subject of collect football schedules, is there a standard for date and time formats? For dates I've been using DD/MM/YYYY, while you seem to be using Month-DD. For time I've been using h:mm AM/PM while you are using h:mm a.m./p.m. See 2005 Michigan Wolverines football team for an example of my format usage. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

big ten tv networks
added the tv networks for week 3-5 like you asked. thanks for asking me to update it. i am willing to help in any way i can. i love college football so much that i want everything as up to date as possible (time willing on my part). please let me know if i can help in any way anymore throughout the season with football and basketball. i did even update a few images on iowa and illinois basketball pages i noticed werent there. i also went ahead and ceated the 2009 ACC football season page and will get to the reamaining conferences in weeks to come, let me know if you have any suggestions.Bsuorangecrush (talk) 09:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * thanks for the suggestion on the ranking tables. that does make sence for the larger conferences, but i dont think ill add it to the WAC page since only boise state has been ranked and really no other wac team is going to come close this year, having a talbe for every team will just waste space, but for the big east and acc pages it makes sence. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 23:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

RE: Jason Avant
I don't think so. It's almost as bad as putting in a picture that only has Avant's hand in it.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  19:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Should we add all the categories to CHIBOTCATS? Pknkly (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/McDonald's Cycle Center/archive2
Thanks for the notice, I will take at it in the next day or two. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, I have to read the article and FAC carefully first. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Template:CBB Schedule Entry
Is there a way to add optional columns for high scorer, rebounder and assists? I would like next season to be able to have the same information as I use at 2008–09_Michigan_Wolverines_men's_basketball_team.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Added top scorer, rebounder and assist maker options. Try them out and let me know if you have any comments on it as you will be the first to view.  Thanks.  Jazznutuva (talk) 14:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Two questions. 1.) What if there is a tie (see game 20 in my example above). 2.) Why all leaders in one column?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * 1.) Just put a "/" between the two names. 2.) I put them all in the same column because I thought when fully populated, the whole schema seemed really squished by adding three new full columns... I assume if more people complain I will change it but I think it looks pretty clean at the moment.

Errors:


 * 1) Homecoming unexplained
 * Never implemented... when created I modelled after a similar one for college football. I ended up not implementing but left tag for possible later addition. Jazznutuva (talk) 14:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Attend not in blank section
 * fixed this one myself.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Cellspacing not working at 2009–10_Michigan_Wolverines_men's_basketball_team#Schedule.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I have tried to enter test content in attend and record fields and they showed up in the wrong columns.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Because this was an addition after mass use of this template... I had to use an if: statement as opposed to an :ifeq switch statement. This requires the use of a spacing character to allow for this problem... so in the "highscorer" part of each entry you will have to add a "--" or other placeholder to properly space the content.  To make it work like the others would require everyone who uses the table change their tags.  I'll update the documentation. Jazznutuva (talk) 14:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Reassessment of Wigwam (Chicago)
As you are a significant contributor to the article, I wanted to be sure you were aware that Wigwam (Chicago) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Malleus Fatuorum 18:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Permission to make Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics a featured article
May I have permission to make Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics a feature article nominee? Please respond on my talkpage ASAP. Secret Saturdays (talk) 02:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The FA-page is up and ready! The page is right here. Secret Saturdays (talk) 02:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

GAR question
Hi. Don't worry, I'm not planning on working on a current GAR! I do have a question, though. I notice from here that the Jane Fonda article is on this list for reassessment, but the talk page indicates it was reassessed and kept in April 2009. Is it necessary to undertake another reassessment so soon after the last one? Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Cloud gate
I left a message at Talk:Cloud Gate, perhaps you would like to respond? I realize it was sourced, but if it is a direct quote then it should designated as such. Otherwise, I don't see what "unconventional gateways to spiritual consciousness" has to do with a bean-shaped mirror. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  15:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Can you review Talk:United Arab Emirates/GA1 for me please?
Can you please review United Arab Emirates, as it's a good article nominee? Secret Saturdays (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Chicago bid
I have responded to your post at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 12:41, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:48, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
 * In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Thanks for adding the template
Thanks for adding the template Obama Administration personnel to Jesse Lee (politician) and Macon Phillips. Can those individual 2 articles then also be added into the template? Cirt (talk) 04:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅, though it looks like that WikiProject talk page is fairly inactive, but perhaps I am wrong about that. :) Cirt (talk) 04:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Trump Tower... apologies
Hi Tony - I am very sorry that I didn't get to the FAC in time before it closed. I have been virtually inactive for the past three weeks due to travel and an extensive workload. I probably won't be nearly as active as before for at least another month, but I will definitely be able to respond to queries more quickly.

I know it is a little late, but for next time: this list from CTBUH can be used in place of this to verify Q1 as the tallest residential tower; I wouldn't classify the latter as a reliable source. Let me know if I can help out in any way. As for World Architecture News, IO would classify that as a reliable source - it is, after all, backed by CTBUH. Cheers, Rai • me  15:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for heads up on intent to delete category
Thanks for the heads up for the intent to delete category:WikiProject Chicago content categories. Pknkly (talk) 06:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
In order for me to try and convey the importance of Category:WikiProject Chicago content categories I need people to understand and accept the concept discussed within this section. I need that because I will be referring to the "Core Categorization Scheme" and how the content category fits into it. My plan is to create a categorization diagram that depicts the Core Scheme and how the content category is used within it. I hope the diagram will convey the importance of the category in a way that doesn't rely on repeating the reasons for my support of the category. Pknkly (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC) Pknkly (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
Just realized I forgot to watchlist the FAC - will look at it more closely and weigh in on that issue tomorrow. Am slowly copyediting it before weighing in on support or not on the FAC. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Appreciate the start up and continuation of the Chicago Project
Just wanted to let you know I've looked at the History listing within various Chicago Project pages and have seen the extent of the work you have done. Thanks for time and the effort you put into starting up the project and the time and effort you continue to put into keeping it going. Pknkly (talk) 04:18, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Danita Angell
An editor has nominated Danita Angell, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Interview: Interview with John Blossom
 * News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
 * In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

TFA request
Hi, TTT. The request for Prairie Avenue at WP:TFA/R doesn't yet fully comply with the instructions in Suggested formatting at the top of the page. Could you please review it for compliance, including alt text? You can compare it to the blurb at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/October 28, 2009. Thanks, Sandy Georgia (Talk) 03:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Just FYI. Pknkly (talk) 17:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Request documenting Chicago Project categorization instructions to user. Pknkly (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Its ok "to have an article both in a category and one of its subcats". Please see the discussion. Pknkly (talk) 07:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

2009–10 NCAA Division I men's basketball rankings
I'm attempting to add a table of the voters in the coaches poll, but it seems to be merging with the Pre-season rankings table. Not sure why it's merging. I will trouble-shoot and hopefully get it to work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chitown03 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Old Illinois Central Yard.jpg
File:Old Illinois Central Yard.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Old Illinois Central Yard.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Millennium Park image map
Glad you like it, thanks. I originally made it to show up the same width (450 pixels) as the other map it replaced. The fonts on the original are the right size so that the looked about the same on my browser as the original linked label map. I just tried making it only 400 pixels wide and it still is legible on my browser - I would not go any smaller and the MOS says maps can be made larger for clarity. How does 400 px look to you?

It can be placed right or left (just like any image). Before we go putting it in all the articles, please check the map and make sure the areas are OK (they checked out on my monitor). I used rectangles as that was easiest, though it means some neighboring areas are linked for the bridge, Pritzker pavilion and a few others. Also no link for Monroe Street. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 14:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I could make the labels a bit larger, but it would take a fair amount of time (I would have to redraw every label). Let's see what Awadweit thinks, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 14:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The current map is 11 point Tahoma bold font. I can go to 14 point (not bold) and still squeeze Cloud Gate in its slot. Let me know, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 15:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and made the 14 point version. It is in McDonald's Cycle Center at 350 pixels wide, Chase Promenade at 400 pixels wide in, and in Lurie Garden at 200 pixels wide. The original map it replaced was 450 pixels wide. Let me know what you think when you're back online, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 16:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your recent changes!
Thanks for your recent edits!! - You placed one brick in the sum of all human knowledge, and that deserves recognition. 189.217.171.135 (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Anne Hathaway
I guess I need to say "Ack!!" I had started working on it, then a newish editor came in and there was discussion. I was waiting for him to comment and had asked a couple other editors to help me find more information about her current boyfriend since I was hitting walls in finding something, and I still don't have much of anything that isn't already in there. I'll work on it this weekend and hopefully finish it up. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Re:Rivera
I withdraw my request. BUC (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

FAC
Please consider reviewing a few FACs! Perhaps one day you will not only be the "English Wikipedia's most prolific reviewed-class encyclopedic content contributor" but also its most prolific reviewer! Awadewit (talk) 23:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)