User talk:Trillig

Congrats... You created your Teahouse profile!Face-smile.svg
Nice to see you at the Teahouse! I hope you like to be here,if you have any question (s),feel free to leave me a message,and I will respond soon! Carliitaeliza  TALK  19:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment
Hey Trillig; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Road junction lists". {| style="border: 0; width: 100%;"
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:


 * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:


 * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
 * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
 * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
 * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:


 * Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors.   Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
 * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
 * Sign and date your posts with four tildes " ".
 * If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 08:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Sir Ivison Macadam
I believe you edited the entry for my late father, Sir Ivison Macadam, to change the order and list all his decorations appearing after his name. The way you have listed them is actually incorrect practice. The only decorations listed after a recipient's name are the most senior of those to which the recipient is elevated (not from minor to major). In my father's case it therefore is KCVO (Knight Commander of the Royal Victorian Order) which takes precedent over and replaces all other Royal Victorian Order decorations. Likewise the CBE replaces the OBE and is therefor the only Order of the British Empire that should appear after his name. It therefore should read Sir Ivison Macadam KCVO, CBE, FRSE. Can I leave it to you to change this back to the correct style. No major matter but it is the correct style.

Many thanks.

William I. Macadam — Preceding unsigned comment added by William Macadam (talk • contribs) 12:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Response found here. Trillig (talk) 15:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (King George III Museum) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating King George III Museum, Trillig!

Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Interesting article"

To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)