User talk:TwoNyce

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Mayweather / flagicons
Before reverting my removal of the flagicons, please participate in the discussion at Talk:Joe Calzaghe to weigh in on the debate. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, too late. You've already reverted me twice. Not willing to discuss? Too bad. You can also join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing if you change your mind. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * OK then, discussion started. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Flagicon issues
Hello TwoNyce, as you might know there is an ongoing discussion about flag icons in boxing record tables and I would appreciate if you could share your opinion or at least voice you support or opposition. It would be great if you could voice your opinion here in the "RfC: Flag icons in professional boxing record tables" section. Cheers!--Fallengrademan (talk) 01:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Re: PPV buys
You're full of shit on this one: "Espinoza said sales of that fight are now up to 4.6 million, which is where he expects them to settle." Showtime official himself stating the figure—it's right there. If that's what you call "irrelevant", and grounds to keep reverting my change to the article, then you're nothing short of delusional. Take a read of WP:OWN and get a clue. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * You make me wanna laugh. I see no other sources saying otherwise. Only articles saying "Stephen Espinoza said so". C'mon Is that all you got. Wouldn't that type of news be all over the place?? Thats shit is just as reliable as Don Rafeal saying Mayweather-Guerrero did 870k. please man --User:TwoNyce 22:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * And I see no sources disputing the updated figure of 4.6mil. They no longer quote 4.4mil because of that. You said on my talk page: "The only thing that matters is what Showtime and HBO officials said. I see nothing where to they said 4.6 million buys came in." Showtime official Espinoza said it above, so as I said—you are flat-out full of shit. Laugh all you want, but these are WP:RS and the figure is as good as official. Take it to WP:DR if you want and make me laugh this time. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 01:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh yea, and just for kicks: 4.6 mil confirmed from the HBO side only last month. Give it up, dude. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 01:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Mixtape, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Hello TwoNyce--

Please note that the prior revert was similarly due to original research concerns, where personal analysis was being added in the form of an image caption. If you have any other questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, '' Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Menace II Society (soundtrack), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Clinton and Zapp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Edition timeline
Template:New Edition timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited World War III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page USS Enterprise ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/World_War_III check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/World_War_III?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into World War III. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bloods, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dr. Dre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mel-Man.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Cohen crime family for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cohen crime family, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Cohen crime family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm MarkH21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Grape Street Watts Crips, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 07:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)