User talk:UkPaolo/Archive 6

Paul Torrisi.jpg
Why are there other images around wikipedia that are fine and are screenshots of TV programmes. Yet I took this screen shot on Media Centre and yet I am being accused of copyright violation. I don't think I am being fairly treated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olz06 (talk • contribs)
 * Firstly, let me clarify things. I don't believe anybody has accused you of copyright violation - I certainly haven't. You uploaded an image as fair use, and I have said that since it could be replaced, it doesn't meet the terms of our policy, and should be deleted.
 * Secondly, there is nothing wrong with screenshots of television programmes per se. To illustrate an article on EastEnders, for example, it would be perfectly reasonable to include a screenshot of some of the cast. The point there is that that usage does not violate the terms of our criteria - that image could not be replaced by a free equivalent, since they are fictional characters, being portrayed on a set to which there is restricted access. The same could be said of a screenshot of a particular televised event, which has happened in the past, if it was being used to illustrate an article on the event in question. Because it is being listed as fair use it all comes down to usage... the same image could be perfectly justifiably used in some ways, and not in others. To be used to illustrate an article about Paul Torrisi we really need an image licensed under a free content license. That basically means that someone who has taken a photo of him (and thus owns the copyright to that photo) chooses to make such an image available under a free use license. If this is not possible, we could potentially use a copyrighted image (such as an image from a press pack, like this, or a screen shot of a television show like you've just uploaded) under a fair use rationale. However, to justify fair use, an image must meet our policy at Fair use criteria. The problem with this image is that it fails the first criterion: a free equivalent could be created that would adequately give the same information (as I said above, that's not to say that creating an equivalent would be easy...). The same problem would be true of any other copyrighted image which you upload under a fair use rationale. To give a further illustration of the idea of "fair use", we could probably justify fair use of your screenshot to illustrate an article on Paul Torrisi's Breakfast Interview (if that was an important event, worthy of a Wikipedia article), but not to illustrate an article of the subject concerned. Similarly, we could justify using a copy of a magazine's front cover featuring Tony Blair to illustrate an article about "Blair in the media", but not to illustrate Blair himself (since a free alternative could be obtained...)
 * There may very well be similar images being used elsewhere on Wikipedia. There's currently quite a back log of such images which have been identified to be deleted (just look in all the subcategories of Category:Replaceable fair use images!) Unfortunately, the fact that there may be other images used incorrectly doesn't change my opinion of this image. If you come across any such images, I'd invite you to tag them for deletion, in accordance with our Fair Use policy.
 * I can assure you that my tagging of this image is in no way personal, and that you are being treated fairly an in accordance with our policies. If you dispute the policy itself, I'd advise discussing it at the talk page of our Fair Use policy, or asking questions at Media copyright questions page. I hope this clarifies things. Regards └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 20:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Southampton
I don't think so that Polish community website is irrevelant for Southampton Wikimedia. We add that links do Culture and we promote that there becouse in Soton is abouth 30 thousent Polish people and we promote they culture ... Kind regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.44.239.52 (talk • contribs)

Thanks
Thanks for the help. I thought i'd broken wikipedia! Dalejenkins 18:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007
The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published.You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. BetacommandBot 20:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
Seeing as your an administrator i'd thought i'd ask why, do you think, my user name is not on the list: Category:Wikipedians seeking to adopt in Adopt-a-user. I put the box on my user and talk page but it will not, for some reason appear on the list.... Please help!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by olz06 (talk • contribs)
 * Hi - it appears you are correctly listed on Category:Wikipedians seeking to adopt in Adopt-a-user... perhaps you were viewing a cached page? └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 12:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Boldrewood
UkPaolo,

Why did you delete my edit to the Boldrewood page?

The Tunnel soc (with whom I am in no way affiliated) does exist, and campaign for the reopening of the tunnel. The University does not either confirm or deny the existence of the tunnel... (I personally don't believe there would be a foot tunnel between the campuses, but that is not relevant to a Wikipedia discussion) NC602 15:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia. The reason I removed your addition to the Boldrewood article is that this is an encyclopedia, and as such content should be both notable and verifiable. I don't really consider mention of the tunnel to be either. I accept that there is a university society who claim there is a tunnel, but I don't consider that fact to be particularly noteworthy in a global encyclopedia. A previous article about that society was deleted by consensus, as not being important. You also failed to reference any reliable external source to back up the addition. If, for example, The Times ran an article on the society, or BBC South Today ran a story about it, I'd consider my views differently, but as it stands, I don't consider it worthy of inclusion. I do hope this won't put you off staying around and editing further. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 17:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

The Apprentice (UK)--re-nominate for featured article status?
After Bravedog's initial nomination, all/most of the needs specified have been completed. Do you think its worth re-nominating The Apprentice (UK) for FA or GA status? Dalejenkins 17:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Dale, since the previous FA nomination I do think the article has improved enormously, and that is a credit to yourself and other editors who have contributed. I do think work still needs to be carried out to ensure that all references follow the correct format (the easiest way to ensure consistency is to use the templates such as ). I did begin this, but there is a lot further to go.
 * After that, I'd suggest listing the article at Peer review in order to generate further discussion about any more work which should be carried out prior to re-nomination for FA (or GA, which would probably be a sensible stepping-stone to aim for on the way to gaining FA status).
 * └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 17:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Apprentice Screenshots
Hi there, seeing as you're an administrator I thought I'd ask you this question I have. On the page List of The Apprentice UK candidates, someone has added small screenshots of some of the series 3 candidates - are these images fair use? It would be nice to include them for all candidates for all series, but I'm hesitant to add them as I'm not too familiar with what would and wouldn't be fair use. Thanks! Seaserpent85 12:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I have recently discovered that it's against Wikipedia policy to have more than x many screenshots on one article. That's why the Big Brother articles have removed all of the housemate pictures. Dalejenkins 18:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Kempshott, Basingstoke Hampshire
You have removed the link I placed on the Kempshott page. This link was to the largest community site that covers Kempshott, with support and details of almost all the community groups in Kempshott. You say that you Wikipedia is not for links to commercial websites, does that mean any websites that has paid adverts, even if their aim is to provide community information. The Kempshott page has links on it, 2 go to the same site which also has adverts on it. There are also many sites in Southampton, Portsmouth, Winchester and Andover which have links many of which are not relevent or mentioned on the page or have adverts on them. I can understand the policy but it doesnt seem consistant currently. Phill 83.217.164.158 21:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

The Apprentice (UK) Peer Review
I've nominated it for peer review, now we'll have to just wait and see. Dalejenkins 18:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

re: 24dash.com
Hey there, after looking at the article and web site some more, you are definitely correct. I restored the article. I would rather an external source backing up its claim, but it should be a useful stub for the time being. Thanks for discussing it with me! --Spike Wilbury 16:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Many thanks └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 16:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Happy first edit day
Politics rule 23:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Kate Moss article protection
The article of Kate Moss is being subjected to constant vandalism and I was wondering whether it would be worth partly protecting the page? It would be great if you could look into this being an administrator. Many thanks. Eagle Owl 18:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * fair point, I've semi protected the page for the time being, which should hopefully stop it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 19:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the semi protection on the article. Lets hope it will deter those vandals. Regards. Eagle Owl 13:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Italian?
Are you italian? (217.42.46.119 20:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC))

Help!
There is a new editor taking an interest in the Jennifer Saunders article where lots of edits are below Wikipedia standards. The editor is constantly updating the article and some of it is absolute drivel and unsourced, whilst some is fairly good. The worrying thing is that it is going live on the internet and I'm struggling to keep up correcting and changing the article. I have left a message on the editor's talk page but what else can be done? Eagle Owl 14:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Semi-Protection of the "Candidates" article
As an admin, can you help here? Thanks. Dalejenkins 19:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Syed Ahmed ............... Again!
I Mean hes been really sucessful why not??? Bobo6balde66 20:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I made my reasoning pretty clear here. He may have been successful, but I personally don't believe he is sufficiently notable to merit an article here. Since previous deletion discussions have agreed with this, if you wish to discuss this matter further, I suggest posting to Deletion review. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 22:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Semi protection for Sharon Osbourne
Hi, I'm here for help again. The article Sharon Osbourne is coming under really heavy vandalism by one of more vandals. Could you please consider this article for semi protection. Many thanks again. Eagle Owl 18:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Removal of Basingstoke Business Directory link
Dear UKPaulo,

Can you please explain why you removed the link to the basingstoke business directory that I added?

On the history notes, you say it was because the site is a commercial link. But after reading the external links guide, I can find no definitive rule within the WP:EL which specifically excludes commercial entries (the guidelines only say that commercial entries should be "avoided").

I think this particular site has relevant information which is not available in any of the other external links. This Business Directory is the largest of it's type that I've found to date and it also includes a local events calendar, a map of the arterial roads around Basingstoke and a handful of articles about Basingstoke. I think most people would therefore agree that this would make the external link relevant to the basingstoke wiki article.

80.0.82.71 10:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Frank Tanner
 * Frank, I'll confess to being somewhat confused by your message since I'm unsure exactly which edit you're talking about. From looking over the Basingstoke article history I can only assume you are referring to this, in which case your grievance is with User:Mighty Antar and not with myself. I would, however support his decision. basingbusiness.com appears to be a directory containing largely commercial links. The fact that it might be "the largest of it's type" as you say (and I would possibly dispute that, but it's by the by), is no reason for it to be included. Per External links links should be kept to a minimum, and to my mind this doesn't appear to be a particularly useful one to add. I don't feel it really adds value, and doesn't directly relate to the article's subject (it doesn't really inform the reader about Basingstoke, more of businesses based in it). It's more of use to people living there, than people reading an encyclopedia entry about the place. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 21:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ernie mark 1 console.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ernie mark 1 console.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Konstable 10:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Christine Young
Someone is trying to delete Christine Young again. I know you voted to keep the article the first time. Articles for deletion/Christine Young (2nd nomination) Jmm6f488 05:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Student Affairs
Hi! I noticed you have contributed greatly to some education-related articles and I was wondering if you'd like to join a WikiProject for Student Affairs that I'm trying to start. I tried this a few months ago but there was no interest, so now I'm trying to contact people directly that may have an interest. Let me know if you'd want to join such a WP so I can submit a request. Thanks! -- Noetic  Sage  23:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 16:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free media (Image:University of Southampton.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:University of Southampton.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LondonCentral.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LondonCentral.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  PxMa 23:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:LondonGeneral.png
I have tagged Image:LondonGeneral.png as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you.  PxMa 23:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

On Clipmate deletion
Hi!

Why did you delete the article on Clipmate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.16.122.218 (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Erm, that was a while back! I deleted ClipMate under Criteria for speedy deletion A7: namely that there was no indication of importance/significance - basically, it didn't read like the application was significantly notable to merit an article on Wikipedia, since the article failed to give any indication to the contrary. If you'd like to discuss the matter further, I suggest you post to Deletion review. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 19:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

ClipMate continued.
Have a look at this! ClipMate wins "Best Application" at the 2007 Shareware Industry Awards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.16.122.218 (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

ClipMate continued.
Have a look at this! ClipMate wins "Best Application" at the 2007 Shareware Industry Awards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.16.122.218 (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well firstly, I don't believe that statement was in the article. Secondly, whilst I'd agree that is an assertion of notability, I still have concerns that it makes the software sufficiently notable to merit an article on an encyclopedia. However, I'd urge you, as I said previously, to start a discussion on this matter at Deletion review. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 22:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

You are right. It was not in the article. I just wanted to see if you are biased or what... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.16.122.218 (talk) 22:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Qmc logo.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Qmc logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla 00:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:FestivalPlace-tower.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FestivalPlace-tower.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:University of Portsmouth.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:University of Portsmouth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WhereTheBloodyHellAreYou.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WhereTheBloodyHellAreYou.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Mike McCracken
I do not understand why you requested my first aritcle for deletion under the reason that it was advertising? I am new to the site and only had tried to start the page. I am so far a slow editor learning the ropes, please allow time for me to gather information and references for what will be an informative and important article to contribute to the Wikipedia community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nra4ever5585 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day
Idontknow 610 TM 20:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Acciona.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Acciona.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:PigOfHappiness.gif
I have tagged Image:PigOfHappiness.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Premium Bonds brochure.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Premium Bonds brochure.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WHSmith.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:WHSmith.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 24dash.com
An article that you have been involved in editing, 24dash.com, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/24dash.com. Thank you. Schuy m 1 (talk ) 22:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wessex Lane Halls
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wessex Lane Halls, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fluteflute Talk Contributions 09:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Geodata
Hello! When you created Alton Towers railway station, the template contained a grid reference of "WGS84". WGS84 is the name of a geodetic reference system, and isn't a valid grid reference, which results in it confusing the geolocation software and geodata maintenance tools. Can you tell me if you created any other articles with similar template entries, please? -- The Anome (talk) 11:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ComicRelief.png)
Thanks for uploading File:ComicRelief.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steve hernandez


The article Steve hernandez has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * See Steve Hernandez

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-08-03t11:51z 11:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Attentatet i Pålsjö skog
An article that you have been involved in editing, Attentatet i Pålsjö skog, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Law Lord (talk) 05:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Heaven (novel)
I have nominated Heaven (novel), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Heaven (novel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jclemens (talk) 00:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello UkPaolo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jane Hissey -

File:Fairtrade.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fairtrade.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Elvey (talk) 17:47, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hint: See FUR at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Transfaircanada.png
 * I delisted it. It's good to use a template, but I think it's OK not to.--Elvey (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Baughurst
The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fairtrade.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Fairtrade.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:PigeonStreet.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PigeonStreet.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pizza Express.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Pizza Express.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FestivalPlace-logo.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:FestivalPlace-logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Strait A Students deletion
I see you are responsible for deleting the Wikipedia entry for the Bellingham, WA band Strait A Students. I would like to produce some evidence that the band is indeed at the very least regionally notable:

- Googling "strait a students" produces 32k results.

- The band's music is streaming on Pandora Radio: http://www.pandora.com/strait-students

- 27K connections on MySpace. http://www.myspace.com/straitastudents/friends

- Album available at Best Buy: http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Pursuit+Of+Hopelessness+(Bb)+-+CD/9109136.p?id=1927812&skuId=9109136&st=strait%20a%20students&lp=1&cp=1

- Streaming on touchtunes digital jukeboxes across the country. http://www.mytouchtunes.com/artist/112721/strait-a-students.html

Thanks for your time. 173.160.208.46 (talk) 23:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Ryan

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * N.B.: I apologize if you have received any duplicate e-mail messages pursuant to this notification; this may have been due to technical difficulties on the Toolserver. Thanks, &mdash; madman 18:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Queen of the North.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Queen of the North.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

FAR
I have nominated The Apprentice (UK TV series) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
Happy Birthday! 20-13-rila (talk) 09:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Basingstoke/GA1
Hi. I've opened a GAR on the Basingstoke article for which you are one of the main contributors. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding sourcing, prose, and several MoS issues, see Talk:Basingstoke/GA1 for more details.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  16:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EasyGroup.png
 Thanks for uploading File:EasyGroup.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:09, 24 August 2014 (UTC)