User talk:Umedard

Welcome, too :)
A dyskusję najlepiej archiwizować przenosząc ją z całą historią (Special:Movepage/User talk:Umedard). Paweł ze Szczecina 18:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Concerning 'Controversial Incidents involving Jarosław Kaczyński
Medard, neither of us wants a forth-and-back reverting orgy on that topic. Please have a look at the discussion page of that article (here). I left you a comment at the bottom and would like to discuss the issue with you. Best regards.

Transliteration policy
As a member of WikiProject Ukraine, you are invited to participate in the discussion about transliteration of Ukrainian words. I would appreciate your participation. Discussion is located here. Thank you. — Alex(U 17:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Award


Hello
I'm working on some Polish political articles (routine maintenance) and could either use the help of a bot or a contributor like you. Any advice? TableManners 03:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Jarosław Kaczyński
Hi, I noticed you removed the link to far right in Jarosław Kaczyński. Although the matter is debatable, I personally reckon Kaczynski would comfortably fit into the "normal right" in the United States, but NOT in Europe. His vociferous support of the death penalty and his publicly flaunted homophobia, Germanophobia and bigotry put him very, very far to the right of mainstream European politics. Indeed, I'd be curious to see if you can find any European Prime Minister farther to the right than Kaczynski... Cheers! --Targeman 16:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Lublin Voivodeship
This is to inform you that the above project page is being considered for deletion. Please feel free to take part in the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Lublin Voivodeship. Thank you. John Carter 21:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kaczynski.jpg
You uploaded the image Image:Kaczynski.jpg which is now on Commons. The image is is a copyright violation as it also appears on http://www.kprm.gov.pl/s.php?bio=72&path=3252. Evil Monkey - Hello 03:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

No content in Category:Abramów Commune
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Abramów Commune, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Abramów Commune has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Abramów Commune, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:PiS
Template:PiS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Sardanaphalus (talk) 04:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Umedard/articles
Doing regular housekeeping on Category:Template loop warnings I noticed that one of your userpages, User:Umedard/articles, includes a template loop. Since you allready have a page User:Umedard/Articles (with capital "A") you may want to blank this page or delete it. You can do that by adding db-userreq on top of it. Debresser (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pagan reaction in Czech
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pagan reaction in Czech, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Poland
We are now dividing our members into active, semi-active (have not edited a Poland-related article in more then three months or have 10 or less edits per month on average) and inactive (have not edited at all for three months or more). You occasionally edit Poland-related articles but have few edits in the past months; we are moving you to semi-active members category. Please consider participating in our project activities again in the future, we would love to work more closely with you again! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Lubartow.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lubartow.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ja Ga  talk 23:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lubartow1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lubartow1.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 02:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Zamek-poznan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zamek-poznan.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 08:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Umedard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 26 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Wojciech Szczurek -
 * 2) Anna Borucka-Cieślewicz -
 * 3) Wojciech Borzuchowski -
 * 4) Andrzej Diakonow -
 * 5) Józef Fortuna -
 * 6) Hanna Mierzejewska -
 * 7) Marek Muszyński -
 * 8) Ryszard Nowak -
 * 9) Jacek Sauk -
 * 10) Bartłomiej Szrajber -

11. Elżbieta Więcławska-Sauk 12. Anna Kurska 13. Robert Smoktunowicz 14. Tomasz Misiak 15. Władysław Sidorowicz 16. Andrzej Maria Gołaś 17. Tadeusz Maćkała 18. Roman Ludwiczuk 19. Andrzej Person 20. Andrzej Pruszkowski 21. Grażyna Gęsicka 22. Anna Kalata 23. Krzysztof Skowroński 24. Tomasz Sakiewicz 25. Mirosław Kochalski 26. Joanna Duda-Gwiazda

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Kirchholm.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kirchholm.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Lubartów.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lubartów.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Lubartow10-m.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lubartow10-m.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michnikowszczyzna. Zapis choroby


The article Michnikowszczyzna. Zapis choroby has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article stands totally unsourced, and it is impossible therefore to gauge it's notability. As it is unsourced, I am suggesting deletion until such time as reliable sources are found for this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 14:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

File:250px-PIS.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:250px-PIS.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Herb annopol.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herb annopol.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Herb zwierzyniec.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herb zwierzyniec.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lewart Lubartów


A tag has been placed on Lewart Lubartów requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fenix down (talk) 11:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nasze Miasto Lublin


The article Nasze Miasto Lublin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Warsaw landmarks
Template:Warsaw landmarks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kochas (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sekta Niebo


The article Sekta Niebo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable sect. All external links dead. Pl.wiki article appears to be sourced to blogs."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lubart3.jpg


The file File:Lubart3.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

"1998 Polish local elections" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1998 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andrei (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

"1994 Polish local elections" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1994 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andrei (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

"1990 Polish local elections" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1990 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andrei (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)