User talk:Universal Cereal Bus

This is my talk page. Please sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ). If you're going to delete my page, please put it under the heading "I'm Deleting Your Page". If you're blocking me, please put it under "You're Blocked". For anything else, guess. You're allowed to personally attack me, and I won't revert it. Go ahead, give me all you want.

I'm Deleting Your Page

Speedy deletion of The Look (band)
A tag has been placed on The Look (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Plrk (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Steve Wright (bassist)
A tag has been placed on Steve Wright (bassist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds 17:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello, Ironholds! Please allow me to explain my point on Steve Wright (bassist). I created articles for 3 members of The Greg Kihn Band in a hurry, which explains the horrible (and I mean horrible) quality of the initial page of Dave Carpender - look at the history to see how bad it was. As a consequence, I failed to mention that he worked with David Johansen. And also, lack of individual notability is not covered by CSD. This argument would work at AfD, but CSD is only for total lack of notability. So the article could have been deleted under PROD or AfD, but not CSD. Thanks, Rdbrewster  ♪  ♫  ♪  18:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * My apologies then. Do you have any references for the claim he worked with DJ? And a quick note; firstly, if you're aware of the deletion policy and what is/isn't deletable by CSD/AfD you should have been able to create pages that fulfilled the keep criterion (although I appreciate it was done in a hurry as you said). Ironho<b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 18:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I used to have a reference - it was at BassHero.com (http://www.basshero.com/w/wright-steve.html), but the site shut down recently. Rdbrewster  ♪  ♫  ♪  20:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Good enough for me! :). You might want to go over your created articles list and check they all work with the notability guidelines; a quick overview by me shows that the ones on Stan Lee and Simon Law, for example, dont. <b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 20:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, maybe you're right. I'll try to find out more about these people to see if they match the notability criteria then. Thanks for the advice, Rdbrewster  ♪  ♫  ♪  16:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Robin Simon
This article you have created has been tagged for deletion, because it fails WP:BLP Quicksilverriding (talk) 02:55, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Survived AfD here. Case closed. Universal   Cereal  Bus   ♫♪  12:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

You're Blocked (empty)

Anything Else

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

And per your comments on the Village Pump, I wouldn't put too much stock in the whole "deletionist vs. inclusionist" thing. As with real world politics, the majority of people here are closer to the middle than one of the extreme ends. Wikipedia is not a battleground, and editors who see things in terms of ideologies like "deletionism vs. inclusionism" rather than policy and common sense tend not to last too long here. Again, welcome to Wikipedia from Mr.  Z- man  01:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Your speedy deletion tagging of Basicerotini
Hi there. Just to let you know that I have declined your speedy deletion request onBasicerotini. There are two points which are important here; firstly the speedy deletion criteria are very specific and very narrowly defined, the reason you gave "a topic of limited interest with little research" which I would interpret as WP:IDONTLIKEIT is certainly not in the list and is never likely to be. Secondly the article is and was a perfectly acceptable stub i.e. one of the basic building blocks of this encyclopaedia and there is nothing in any of Wikipedia's deletion policies which could validly be used to propose its removal. CSD tagging is a very important part of Wikipedia and it is great that you are wanting to be involved however I would propose that you read up on the policy before you tag any more articles otherwise you just end up making more work for administrators. If you need any help or advice please don't hesitate to drop by my talk page. The very best of luck, nancy  (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Test signature
Universal Cereal Bus ♫♪ 08:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Never try to "move" a page by copy and pasting. This creates multiple problems. It loses article history (who wrote what), an essential part of the Wikipedia GFDL license. If a page needs to be moved, follow proper procedure as explained at Help:Moving a page. Also, please be sure to start discussion on relevent talk pages before making moves except in the most obvious cases (such as a page just created at a typo). Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Look (band)
Hello. If you recall, you put a speedy deletion tag on The Look (band) (which I created), under criterion A7. I feel that the article had significant claim to notability, saying that they had a #6 hit in England. In my opinion, the article was plenty significant enough to be on Wikipedia. Universal Cereal Bus ♫♪ 18:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, you are right and I was wrong. My apologies. Plrk (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Polish Radio London
Polish Radio London. Dont see anything about TV Uktvhistory064 (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Puerta del sol monterrey
Hi, I've removed the speedy deletion tag from Puerta del sol monterrey because from your comments at its AFD, it appears that you don't know what the article says. I don't speak Spanish, so I don't know either, but we need to know whether or not it actually qualifies for spedy deletion. As you have also put it up for AFD here, it's probably best just to let that pan out, and hopefully someone who speaks Spanish can shed some light. Apologies if I have the wrong end of the stick and you have translated it, I'm just going from your comments at the AFD. -- Beloved Freak  11:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Puerta del sol monterrey
I'm fairly fluent in Spanish, so I'll tell you a couple things about this article. 1.) You're right about "autorpmoción" (self promotion = advertisement). 2.) The article begins "Puerta del Sol is more than a band...", and even though I don't know a few of the words, it seems to be a big PR piece for a band that falls miles short of WP:MUSIC. I've tagged it for A7. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 12:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Saxophonist-stub
Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grutness (talk • contribs)

Cliff Bennett and the Rebel Rousers
Many thanks for the Barnstar. Glad to be of assistance !

Derek R Bullamore (talk)

Re: Your Decline of CSD on Terry Smith (news anchor)
Hi. I am wondering if you would be able to discuss with me the reason for your CSD decline under G11 of this article. I tagged it as G11 since it was blatant advertising, and read like a resume, including the guy's phone number. It was also created by the subject of the article, and was therefore biographical, and did not assert notability. I chose G11 over db-bio, since it was clearly an advert for the guy and his work. Your comments are welcome, please reply here as I now have your page on watchlist. Cheers, Thor Malmjursson (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought being a TV newsreader was notable. Maybe not Universal   Cereal  Bus   ♫♪  18:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * It wasn't the TV newsreader bit I was concerned about; that is notable, yes. It was the fact that the guy created his own article, included his telephone number, details of the jobs he did and it read like a posted resumé.  That was why I G11'd it... I figured it would be better to get it off than have it stay there. Still, I note you Prodded it, and that is ok.  I was just confused as to why the speedy was declined.  Feel free to post anymore views.  :) Thor Malmjursson (talk) 19:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Massive Userbox Alert
Iceflow has taken up the challenge of creating a larger userbox than the one posted on your Userpage. If you would like to view his Carlsberg Userbox you are welcome to go directly to the page concerned! Regards, Thor Malmjursson (talk) 01:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for unbanning me.WHEELER (talk) 01:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Who's Ya Daddy?
A tag has been placed on Who's Ya Daddy? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 01:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support in my recent RfA, which was successful with 58 support, 4 oppose and 1 neutral. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Steve Foley
Greetings, Universal Cereal Bus. You're the one who found he'd been deleted! Thank you! Do you have a copy of Jim Walsh's book? My copy isn't with me at the moment. Do you know if Foley played on any Replacements tracks? "Session musicians" for All Shook Down covers a lot of ground and I don't know. Do you know if a better photo exists? Do you think this article should go on Wikipedia's main page for "Did you know..."? I'll take a break for a while so you can get at the article. Sorry didn't mean to tie it up. Best wishes and thank you for both the article and the infobox. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Switchboard as a service aka GoHello
FYI I have nominated this article for deletion. samj (talk) 07:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations

 * Copied from another talk page. -SusanLesch (talk) 07:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: RFA
Thank you for your expression of confidence, but I must decline. I like writing articles, reverting vandalism, and patrolling the new pages, but I don't want the extra tools right now. I've found that I can contribute to Wikipedia in the ways that I want to without being an admin. Thanks, nonetheless. Cunard (talk) 22:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Re. Is this signature better?
Hello Universal Cereal Bus. Good to see you took my advice at bay. Yes, it is much better and it is no longer visually aggressive. Although I could still suggest that you choose a darker hue of blue on "Special", as I find it a bit harder to read against a white background. Regards, Hús  ö  nd  13:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Universal Cereal Bus, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again,  Spencer T♦C 02:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply: Alternate
Hi, sorry about reverting your edits. I was trying to protect your account from what I suspected might be an impersonator. I'll revert the message I posted at the alternate account, if you haven't already. Wronkiew (talk) 17:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can see your reasoning behind that, given that the name is perilously close to my actual name. But in your edit summary, I think you should put your reasoning. Thanks anyway, Special  K (KoЯn flakes) 18:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, my edits were a little confusing. My edit summary was limited by the maximum length of the field. I should have posted a note on both talk pages explaining what I was doing, instead of just posting one to the alternate. Wronkiew (talk) 18:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Universal Cereal Bus-- I'm Ralph Schuckett, subject of the stub you created. I'm the mammoth task himself. In the flesh. Thanks for the stub! I've never had a stub before, though I do stub a toe now and then. Thanks to you, from now on my name shall be immortal. Now they'll all see! Let's hear them laugh at me now, the ignorant swine! :) I'm in bloody Wikipedia! Where the hell are they? Soon the world will bow down to my genius! (Insert evil laugh). [:)] Anyway, Cereal Dude, I took the liberty of de-mammothising your task. I corrected a couple of things (Damn man, I'm old but not that old!) I added some career highlights and attempted to put things in a chronological order. I hope I did it in the correct Wikipedia way. Cheers! RS —Preceding unsigned comment added by PianoNoCholo (talk • contribs) 04:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Al Ciner
A tag has been placed on Al Ciner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beano (talk) 08:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Adminship
Hi. I wouldn't worry too much about editcount at this stage. It's more quality than quantity that counts.

Questions:


 * 1) Are you always civil?
 * 2) Any experience in adminny areas?
 * 3) Have you had a ER?

Regards, --Dweller (talk) 11:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Xymmax RfA
I'd like to take a minute to let you know that I appreciate your support in my recently-closed RfA, which passed with a count of 56 in support, 7 in opposition, and 2 neutrals. I'll certainly try to justify your faith by using the tools wisely. Happy editing, and thanks again! Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  22:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Rfa Spam
'Thank you for your support on my RFA, which recently passed unanimously. Unfortunately, you have been indefinitely blocked for because of your jokes about my age'. Only joking, thank you for your support, i promise i will try not to let you all down, come find me on my talk page if you ever need my help with anything --Jac16888 (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Main Page redesign
The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, P retzels Talk! 10:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Wikipedians I miss
Thanks for the info I will update it accordingly! :) Best, --Cameron* 12:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

Reply to your message
Hey Sorry. I guess I thought I replied! I'm not sure why I nominated that article for A7. It was probably an accident that I didn't fix properly. Looking at it now, it's definitely not a speedy.  ~Beano~  (talk) (contribs)  23:33, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Sharon Rae Anderson
this page isn't really a valid G3; please read the CSD criteria. Ironholds (talk) 20:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rick Chertoff
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rick Chertoff, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * per wp:Blp "If the entire page is substantially of poor quality, primarily containing contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced, then it may be necessary to delete the entire page as an initial step"

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Click23 (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ellen Shipley
A tag has been placed on Ellen Shipley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 17:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Universal Cereal Bus! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 38 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Martin Swope -
 * 2) Berton Averre -
 * 3) Simon Crowe -
 * 4) Martin Stewart -
 * 5) Tony Butala -
 * 6) Prescott Niles -
 * 7) Christian Tritsch -
 * 8) Robb Royer -
 * 9) Simon Law -
 * 10) Daddae -

11. Mark Tulin 12. Mark Ambler 13. Bob Andrews (keyboardist) 14. Nigel Ipinson 15. Dennis Thompson (drummer) 16. Stan Lee (musician) 17. Larry Lynch 18. John Bradbury (drummer) 19. Tony O'Malley (musician) 20. Daniel P. Carter 21. J.R. Cobb 22. Dean Daughtry 23. Jimmy Ripp 24. Bernard Jackson (singer) 25. Tyler Pope 26. Justin Van Der Volgen 27. Martyn Barker 28. Doug McCombs 29. Andy Sylvester 30. Billy Ray Latham 31. Tim Wright (bassist) 32. Jed Lynch 33. Gary Loizzo 34. Skip Konte 35. Al Ciner 36. Ellen Shipley 37. Jeff Katz 38. Andy Todd (musician)

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day
mheart ( talk ) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ron Berg


The article Ron Berg has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 01:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Let it Be
Your edit to the Let it Be article has been reverted because it contains false info. While it does contain three songs issued as singles, two of them are NOT the same versions found on the album. So only the single with "The Long and Winding Road" and the B-side "For You Blue" is the one taken from the Let it Be album. Steelbeard1 (talk) 22:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * That's fine, I didn't think it mattered but you're right. Special  K (KoЯn flakes) 20:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
For your attentive move to delete what must have looked utterly improbable under the heading People of the Karoo! And thanks for the rapid retraction! All the best. Blarcrean (talk) 09:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DrBlackJack.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:DrBlackJack.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rick Price (bassist)


The article Rick Price (bassist) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Just another band member. No individual notability established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Egghead06 (talk) 19:49, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Fuse (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fuse (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fuse (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Squinge (talk) 13:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Thom Mooney for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thom Mooney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thom Mooney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Squinge (talk) 13:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dik Mik


The article Dik Mik has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 23:40, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Roaring Sixties


A tag has been placed on The Roaring Sixties requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jerry (talk) 23:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blair Cunningham


The article Blair Cunningham has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ralph Schuckett


The article Ralph Schuckett has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable BLP"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Justin Van Der Volgen


The article Justin Van Der Volgen has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This piece does not establish notability, let alone with two sources. Should be a draft if not deleted."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Faits1789 (talk) 04:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)