User talk:UserDude

Rollback granted
Hi UserDude. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AUserDude enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

File:Lorena Borjas (activist, born 1960).jpg
Thanks for uploading this image and writing the fair use rationale. The upload menu lead me to believe the image would not be accepted under fair use, as it may still be possible to obtain a free image of her. I had reached out to the NY Senate, a flickr user with photos of her, and Chase Strangio on twitter to see of any of them would CC-license one of their photos, but I haven't heard anything back. Hopefully the copyrighted image can stay, and if it's questioned, we can say we've made reasonable efforts to obtain a free image. — swpb T&#8201;•&#8201;go beyond&#8201;•&#8201;bad idea 15:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I wasn't sure if the non-replaceable criterion extended to images not yet released under a CC-license that the author might release. I only looked for — and couldn't find — images already released under a CC-license publicly. Thanks again for putting in the work and proactively contacting the copyright holders! userdude 16:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Cesar Cetania
Re talk page comments, it's sort of a waste of time to reply to diffs that were deleted before someone responded. Per the WP:REDACTED link you provided, " If you've accidentally posted to the wrong page or section or if you've simply changed your mind, it's been only a short while and no one has yet responded, you may remove your comment entirely," which was the case. I've never heard of a requirement to put an edit summary on a replaced comment indicating that it is a replacement, but do point me to the policy if there is one. Finally, I know those basic notability WP policies you quoted, from the 790 AfDs that I participated in before this one. I am glad you finally saw this subject as non-notable and I thank you for examining the sources so closely.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:40, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I know any further discussion's essentially a waste of time, but I didn't mean to go digging into your diffs, I just wrote the reply before you changed your comment (edit conflict) and then had to rewrite it so it made sense. As for the edit summary, I think it would fall under WP:SUMMARYNO#1 to write "ce" in the summary when the edit was not just copyediting. userdude 19:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

George Floyd protests
Thanks for your help editing the George Floyd protests page! I noticed you were in favor of including the word "riot" in the first sentence of the lede. I just so happen to agree your sentiment. I wasn't sure if you wanted to start a consensus section for it. There only seem to be a few people arguing against that idea. Let me know and I might be able to help

Thanks, Anon0098 (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you were to start an RFC I'd support it, but I'm not planning on starting one myself. I do think it's important to make sure the article isn't whitewashed, but I'm not terribly concerned about that anymore—the riots are explained in the second paragraph. userdude 05:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey. I slept on it and decided you’re probably right. Not worth the trouble. That being said, they’ll remove “riot” from the second paragraph over my dead body Anon0098 (talk) 05:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Soy boy
I made a Draft:Soy boy after being inspired by your Trollface article, if you can help much appreciated it. 200.120.179.52 (talk) 04:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

About the creation of the Category:Francization
There were no category about cultural Francization, bug have many historical examples of Francization of the Europe, of the countries colonized by Europeans such Canada, Australia, Brazil and United States, Eastern World, Arabian world and the African world

The International System of measures units aka Metric System is a example of Francization of the English speaking countries because the Metric System wasn’t originated in the United Kingdom, was originates in France.

201.6.213.140 (talk) 18:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC).

kill yourself
pk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suso3roiruoiu3w (talk • contribs) 01:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

"Shrek 5 Confirmed" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Shrek 5 Confirmed and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liliana (UwU) 21:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello...
...from a certain someone you know offline. Hope to see you around here a bit more (with the UTC clock, of course). Complex / Rational 15:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)