User talk:Uviolet

WikiProject U2 invitation Not sure if this is where I am supposed to do this, but why did you delete the link to Peach Grove Villas. It is as much of a neighborhood as Wildwood or The Woodlands? Do I need to make the link go to the neighborhood association page? Thanks for your time and all you do to keep Wikipedia clean. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TunaWuna (talk • contribs) 01:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Question about WikiProject South Carolina
Greetings, I have been watching WikiProject South Carolina for a while and it doesn't appear to be very active and I had a proposition for the members to consider. I would like to pull WPUS under WikiProject United States to some degree. I am not necessarily talking a full merger unless thats what the members of WPSC want but here is what I mean. This would do a couple things that I think would benefit both projects. Please let me know what thoughts or ideas you have about this and if the other members would be receptive to this. I also added a message to the talk page of WikiProject South Carolina. Thanks in advance. --Kumioko (talk) 20:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) The project would stay the way it is except for a couple things. I would like to replace WikiProject South Carolina with WikiProject United States and add WPSC to the list of Projects supported by WPUS. This would include replacing the WPSC template on the talk pages of the articles with WPUS/South Carolina (if you want to see an examply you camn look at Washington DC).
 * 2) I would also add it to the list of Projects supported by WPUS on the main WPUS landing page.
 * 1) It would increase visibility of South Carolina and related articles to a much larger user base
 * 2) It would allow WPSC to more easily benefit from the Bots running for WPUS. This includes article alert bot that warns of Articles and Images for deletion or Promotion. This would ensure maximum visibility if an article relating to South Carolina was submitted for deletion or promotion.
 * 3) It would allow the South Carolina related articles to fall under the WPUS and South Carolina scope.
 * 4) It would somewhat reduce the maintenance required by consolidating the templates
 * 5) It would reduce the number of templates visibile on the articles
 * 6) In addition to the above, I typically cycle through all the articles in the WPUS scope every month or 2 fixing various things (sections, typos, persondata, categories, etc) and this would allow the South Carolina articles to fall under that much more easily.

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:20, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject U2 invitation
Hello! This message is to inform you that WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!

You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!

 Miss Bono  [hello, hello!]  20:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=575037744 your edit] to Thomas Bennett, Jr. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:30, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * |party=Democratic-Republican

IP block
It looks like they've stopped for now. Despite the previous block however, warning them again would have been nice. If they do it again make sure to give them at least another level 3 or 4 first. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

PROD
Hi, I'm just  letting  you  know that  I  have dePRODed Cherokee Creek Boys School. Although written in a slightly  promotional  manner, this special  needs school  makes sufficient  claims to  notability. If you still  think  it  should be deleted, you  may  wish  to  consider taking  it  to  WP:AfD,  but  please read WP:OUTCOMES  first. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the work on a series of Charleston, South Carolina articles I've been adding. I've got a tremendous interest in local history (especially architectural), and it's nice to see some improvements to those articles!ProfReader (talk)

Proposed deletion of Woodson Farmstead


The article Woodson Farmstead has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Just because it's in a registrar of old places doesn't make it notable, nothing on google I can find.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &eta;oian  &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  22:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Woodson Farmstead for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woodson Farmstead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Woodson Farmstead until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &eta;oian  &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  11:18, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

You are now autopatrolled
I've approved your request for the autopatrolled userright, as you've been creating high-quality articles. I see you're a member of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places; I am as well, and I'm glad to see another new editor writing quality articles about sites on the National Register. Happy editing! TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 01:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)