User talk:Vordrak

Welcome!
Hello, Vordrak, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bosstopher (talk) 22:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Standard notification
Gamaliel ( talk ) 13:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

To answer your question on AE
Actions taken by administrators under WP:AC/DS don't require consensus, only appeals which require clear consensus to overturn. Statements by editors are not meant to be votes, but instead are to provide context and evidence for enforcing admins. Also, the reply to template can take multiple users so you can combine multiple reply tos into on (e.g. .) — Strongjam (talk) 12:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, I was coming here to leave roughly the same message as , above. They are entirely correct when they say that statements are "not votes"; for additional reading on this I suggest the essay here. On the other concern, there is currently an active Arbitration Committee case which, from my cursory reading, might in part address the question of WP:AC/DS sanctions applied at the discretion of an individual administrators and contemporaneous WP:AE consensus to not sanction. Hope this helps. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 12:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * thank you gentlemen. I shall amend my comments on AE. Vordrak (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
Shaving off a day or two (it appears Gamaliel was going to do this soon anyway), just so you have less opportunity to make statements like this:. Can be appealed to the Committee; I've removed talk page access so you can't threaten anyone else on wiki. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Mark Bernstein case request declined
Hi, Vordrak, You were recently named as an involved party in an arbitration case request. This is a notice to let you know that the case request has been declined by the arbitration committee. Liz Read! Talk! 20:39, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration request
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Case and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,Rhoark (talk) 18:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)