User talk:Wase134

October 2021
Hello, I'm Lone-078. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions;to Alexander the Great have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Lone-078 (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Abd al-Haqq I, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 14:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Eudokia Porphyrogenita moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Eudokia Porphyrogenita, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:53, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
With regard to your recent addition to the Sloughi article: where in the source that you added does it say that the Sloughi "has existed in the Middle East"? M.Bitton (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Indeed, I mistakenly read the source to read Sloughi/Saluki of the the Middle East, when in fact it was referring exclusively to the Saluki.


 * Hence it was a mistake, and a good faith edit. Wase134 (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. You also added "Egypt" to the list of countries where it's found (based on the same source I believe). Could you please remove it? Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 17:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

I thought the Sloughi originated in Syria and Egypt and was brought to the Maghreb during late antiquity? I’m not sure though I can remove it otherwise… Wase134 (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rollo (redirect)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Rollo (redirect) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 12:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mohammed bin Said
Hello, Wase134,

Thank you for creating Mohammed bin Said.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article needs more references. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

‘Playing games’
I am curious as to why you think an editor is ‘playing games’. It is an odd expression. My edits are always good faith. Are you alright? Wase134 (talk) 08:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes I'm fine, some of the recent edits you have made known to me are simply trivial, incorrect and without foundation - as others have informed you on your talk page. Richard Hawkins (talk) 19:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Fair enough - I’m sorry. Like everyone else I’m prone to making mistakes. Wase134 (talk) 22:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

You are making far too many Richard Hawkins (talk) 15:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your recent edits such as adding Ukraine as a C00 of the Borzoi, and removing the archaelogical reference in the IW page, motivated as "clear link" can only be termed as meddling/vandalism, please desist from playing such games.--Richard Hawkins (talk) 12:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Removing the citation was an accident - not vandalism. The repetition of undoing edits with an air of hostility and terming them as ‘playing games’ is more reflective of you at this point. Can we be civil? As for Borzoi, it could be described as Ukrainian as well as Russian but its not a big deal. I hope we can ‘finish the game’ now… Regards, Wase. Wase134 (talk) 13:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hi Wase134! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 11:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

You are still misusing the minor edit tag. Please note that edits like this are not minor edits. Minor edit only refers to superficial edits like typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. DrKay (talk) 06:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Irish Wolfhound
Hi! What purpose do you think is served by edit-warring at Irish Wolfhound‎? You've twice linked a major geographical feature, which we don't do per MOS:OL, and what's more linked it wrong – the Irish Wolfhound‎ was created in the island of Ireland, which at that time was part of the United Kingdom (but it'd probably be contentious to put that in the infobox). May I suggest that you undo your mistaken edit? Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, The modern breed was actually developed in Gloucestershire, England (contentious for sure), but I believe one refers to the ancient breed for an origin in Ireland/Republic of Ireland. Therefore the old breed has nothing to do with the United Kingdom or northern Ireland. Wase134 (talk) 09:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

However, as per manual of style/linking, I will remove the double link. Wase134 (talk) 09:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent edit on the IW is another attempt to meddle with text to suit your own opinion, please desist from rewriting text taken from the breed standard descriptions.--Richard Hawkins (talk) 22:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Eudokia Porphyrogenita
Hello, Wase134. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eudokia Porphyrogenita, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eudokia Porphyrogenita


Hello, Wase134. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eudokia Porphyrogenita".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)