User talk:WikiRedactor/Archive 4

FKA twigs
Please, do not remove neccessary information about her discography. Thannks!

K and K Take
Hi, I noticed that you deleted the individual "K and K" articles and merged them into a single article. I have restored the old pages because the old pages did contain information that was not on the new "K and K" page. I understand that all the series are similar, but I think looking at a similar situation is appropriate when deciding what is best. American Horror Story has a separate article for each of its iterations (e.g. Coven, Asylum, Freak Show) and then another article for the blanket of series (simply titled American Horror Story). I will keep the "K and K" page up because I think you're right that grouping them together creates a valuable article. I just think it is better as a supplement rather than a replacement. Also, the "K and K Take" name is not in any third-party sources to the best of my knowledge. I think naming the article that is a form of original research. Perhaps a better name would be "The Kardashians Take" or simply "Keeping up with the Kardashian spinoffs" -Vince220 (talk)

Good Girl Gone Bad FAC
I gave responses to your queries on the article, you might want to check them up :). — Tomíca (T2ME) 18:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Peer review request
Hello WikiRedactor! Long time no see! I have a requested a peer review for Romance (Luis Miguel album) since it's GA and I want to promote to FA. I was wondering if you could please take a look and review it for me if you're not busy with anything. Cheers! Erick (talk) 22:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time for doing a peer review for the article (even though I could have just waited a bit longer). I went ahead and opened FAC for the article. I'd appreciate if you can comment, that is if you're not too busy right now. Cheers! Erick (talk) 18:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

I've renominated the article for FA again and was hoping if you could leave a comment once more. Thanks! Erick (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Today's Featured Article: Notification
This is to inform you that  Fijación Oral, Vol. 1, which you nominated at WP:FAC,  will appear on the Wikipedia Main Page  as  Today's Featured Article on 31 December 2014. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 23:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for today's music,  precious  again, - happy and peaceful 2015! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 is just around the corner...
Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.


 * We would like to announce that Josh (J Milburn) and Ed (The ed17), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out.
 * In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (Sturmvogel 66) and Christine (Figureskatingfan), who are joining Brian (Miyagawa) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the GA Cup, which she now co-runs.
 * The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Tik Tik Boom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tik Tik Boom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tik Tik Boom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Edge of Seventeen (song)
There is another ongoing move discussion; you can comment there. --George Ho (talk) 05:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

The Pinkprint
Why change the structure it was perfectly fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributor82 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Lorde/archive2
At this moment, the FLC is urgently needing comments. So, could you please cast an eye over it? Much appreciated, Simon (talk) 13:37, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
 Dear, HAPPY NEW YEAR !!! Best wishes to you, your family and relatives this holiday season! Take this opportunity to bond with your loved ones, whether or not you are celebrating Christmas. This is a special time for everybody, and spread the holiday spirit to everybody out there! From a fellow editor, !!!!

This message promotes WikiLove. Re-created by HĐ (imitating Nahnah4's style) (talk | contribs | guestbook).

Though it is quite early to say Happy New Year, hope you the best wishes on this New Year! Simon (talk) 10:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year WikiRedactor!


Happy New Year! WikiRedactor, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 06:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter
Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! , and

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera GAN
Hi, WikiRedactor. I have credited you as a co-nominator in Christina Aguilera good article nomination, as you contributed a lot to the article. Much thanks, Simon (talk) 04:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, it's been a bit. Just letting you know that while I unfortunately failed its GAN on January 31st, this article has drastically improved in recent months largely thanks to you. See Talk:Christina Aguilera/GA3 for my concerns, with the main issue being verifiability. Snuggums (talk / edits) 08:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DemiLovatoHeartAttack.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:DemiLovatoHeartAttack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SMSBangerzSnippet.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:SMSBangerzSnippet.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge,  led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
 * took Bumblebee, a level-4 vital article, to Good Article;
 * worked-up the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 article, also to Good Article status;
 * developed an extremely timely article to Good Article, taking Magna Carta there some 800 years after it was first sealed;
 * And last but not least, worked up a number of Featured Pictures during round 1, including the 1948 one Deutsche Mark (pictured right), receiving the maximum bonus due to the number of Wikis that the related article appears in.

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. , and

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Precious again
  in the spirit of Wikipedia

Thank you for quality articles in collaboration on singers and albums such as Demi Lovato and Fijación Oral, Vol. 1, and for reviews deserving "nothing's more in the spirit of Wikipedia" (than pitching in on a GA review ...), - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC) A year ago, you were the 788th recipient of my  Pumpkin Sky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Peer review/Don't Stop the Music (Rihanna song)/archive1
Hey Wiki. Can you please check out the PR? I want to bring the article to FA, so I would like to see your comments how further to improve the prose. Thanks! — Tomíca (T2ME) 21:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus. Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
 * was one of several users who worked on improving Ulysses S. Grant. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article.
 * took Dragonfly to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took Damselfly there as well for a 2x bonus.
 * worked up Alexander Hamilton to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a level 4 vital article.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! , and  16:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:ShakiraEstoyAqui.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ShakiraEstoyAqui.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Upcoming Lauren Conrad series listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Upcoming Lauren Conrad series. Since you had some involvement with the Upcoming Lauren Conrad series redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk 20:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AllGoodThingsTheHills.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:AllGoodThingsTheHills.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've also nominated File:ItsOnBitchTheHills.jpg and File:NewCityNewDramaTheHills.jpg for the same reason- sorry! Basically, screenshots are rarely justified on episode articles- there is no assumption in their favour, in the way that there is an assumption in favour of (say) posters/DVD covers on film articles. Instead, screenshots can only be used when they illustrate something that cannot be understood without being seen, and needs to be understood. This is very different from being, for example, screenshots of very important scenes. The fact a scene is important does not necessarily mean that we need a non-free image of it. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:36, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TumblrHomepage.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TumblrHomepage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MileyTheMovement.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MileyTheMovement.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ElectraHeartSongCover.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ElectraHeartSongCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Miley Cyrus and Her Dead Petz) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Miley Cyrus and Her Dead Petz, WikiRedactor!

Wikipedia editor Megalibrarygirl just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice start. I'd like to see the reviews of the album added."

To reply, leave a comment on Megalibrarygirl's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dooo It!
On a related note, do you have a source to confirm that "Dooo It!" has actually been released as a single? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Some news sites have referred to it as the "first single" from the project, I'll add in a reputable source using that language. WikiRedactor (talk) 02:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I just couldn't find an official confirmation, so I didn't know if perhaps it was a promotional single. This is a bizarre project. I am not even much of a MC fan but I am curious to see what comes of this recording. Thanks for your work on the article! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * This record it crazy! I would love to see what becomes of this too, it's very strange. WikiRedactor (talk) 02:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Most of the album is junk, in my humble opinion, but a couple of the tracks stand out. Actually, now knowing that "Dooo It!" is the lead single, it may be appropriate to start a standalone article sooner than later. Surely the song will receive reviews, as will the music video and her VMA performance. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I think a good portion of the album could benefit from some more editing, but that's the glory of being Miley Cyrus and being able to do whatever you want :) RCA doesn't care because it doesn't count as an album under their contract so it doesn't hurt them lol WikiRedactor (talk) 12:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:


 * , who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy.  A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
 * , second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
 * , first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany.  Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
 * , second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
 * , from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
 * , from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
 * , from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
 * , also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

, and  11:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DemiLovatoHeartAttack.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:DemiLovatoHeartAttack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Honeymoon (Lana Del Rey album)
Thank you for giving this article some love. :) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem! It's the least I can do considering that Drake and Future will rob her of a #1. WikiRedactor (talk) 03:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hah! Are you enjoying the album? I think it is beautiful, but I have to admit, after heading "High by the Beach" I was hoping for a bit more pop infusion. Same old classic hipster LDR, but I still love her music. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I love the album! Definitely better than Ultraviolence, probably tied for my favorite with Born to Die? I'm just really pissed that Target didn't have any bonus tracks this time WikiRedactor (talk) 03:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree, Ultraviolence was quite disappointing. Born to Die/Paradise is still my favorite. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Siri iOS 7.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Siri iOS 7.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Miley Cyrus & Her Dead Petz
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga/archive1
Hello WikiRedactor! It's been a while. Would you mind reviewing this at FLC? Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for your comments. They have been resolved. Would you like to revisit? -- Frankie talk 13:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Walt Disney & Minnie Mouse.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Walt Disney & Minnie Mouse.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Diannaa (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)