User talk:Xx041424

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robin Wright, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Willis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeremy Lalonde


The article Jeremy Lalonde has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Paste Let’s have a chat. 09:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've added some content and refs but it could do with fleshing out. If you have any more verifiable info that would be good? Paste  Let’s have a chat. 10:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremy Lalonde


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jeremy Lalonde requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 09:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Zachary Levi, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  08:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * One of the edits in question did not appear unconstructive to me. The second  I assumed was just a mistake. Maybe you saw things differently. --Fru1tbat (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josh Schwartz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comic Con. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Calidum   ¤   06:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Emilia Clarke shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 06:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I made productive, cited edits to the page why did they all get removed?
 * My warning was regarding the image in the infobox, not your other edits.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 06:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Teen drama, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 08:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kelly McCormack


The article Kelly McCormack has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. KGirlTrucker81talk what I'm been doing 20:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Your addition to Kodak Black has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Minor edits
Can you please stop marking edits as minor when they aren't, and stop leaving misleading edit summaries? Saying "fixed formatting for header" when you actually added and changed content is not helpful to other editors watching these pages. -- Laser brain  (talk)  03:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MTV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Young adult. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kelly McCormack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly McCormack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kelly McCormack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:15, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Chloe Rose
What you're making there is an Other stuff exists argument. Yes, this is done wrong at a lot of other articles, and in a lot of tables. None of that overrules WP:ACCESSIBILITY which is a site policy. 'Rowspan' in the middle of tables like that causes major problems for our sight-impared readership which have to use text-to-speech readers to read Wikipedia. We generally don't disadvantage one set of readers over the other, especially simply because of a "WP:ILIKEIT"-type argument from some of our sighted readership. WP:DTT covers this in some detail (though unfortunately, not enough...).) --IJBall (contribs) 23:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I can understand where you're coming from, IJBall, but after reading that page, I did not see enough substantial proof that this is widely enforced, and almost every Award & Nominations page that I come across is formatted so that the title of the nominated project need not be repeated several times. If a page for a public figure like Jennifer Lawrence has never confronted this issue, I find it odd that you continuously undo the edits to this page, when it is clearly not done for most prominent pages. Xx041424 (talk) 01:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The key line in WP:DTT is this: "...especially to somewhat offset the accessibility problems associated with nested tables and with rowspan and colspan,[4] if these are used despite the accessibility problems they pose" (emphasis mine). Again, just because many tables on Wikipedia are ignoring WP:ACCESSIBILITY (often out of ignorance of the issue as much as due to anything else) doesn't excuse ignoring it once editors are made aware of it. In the specific case of Chloe Rose, the 'rowspan' isn't even a significant difference, as we're talking about just 4 rows there, not 7 or 8 or 10 rows. But, again, WP:ACCESSIBILITY is a site policy which means it trumps pretty much any other argument. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In looking at List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence, it actually looks like most of those tables are ACCESSIBILITY-compliant, even the last one, though it looks like the last 10 or so rows of the final table are now out of ACCESSIBILITY-compliance. I may try to tackle that, or at least mention it at the Talk page there... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You have made some good points, IJBall, but as you also mentioned, on the Chloe Rose page, it is only 4 rows, and hardly poses a threat to accessibility. Also, to note, the only reason the first few tables on the Jennifer Lawrence page seem to comply is because it is by award show, and therefore, for the first few (Academy Awards, etc), there is no need for rowspan because she is only nominated for one award per film (Best Actress). As you can see, as the page goes on, when she is nominated for more than one award per film, per award show (starting with Screen Actors Guild Awards), row span is used for the titles to avoid repetition. Xx041424 (talk) 00:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)