Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/Archive 4

Silk Road
. Three oppose votes. North America1000 12:22, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:VITAL article - Evad37 &#91;talk] 09:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 01:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose – Already very well developed; unlikely to realize much improvement from this project. North America1000 10:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose Already a decent article, not a huge amount this project could do. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose It's fine as is. Maybe very minor updates could be done, that's it though. -- Anar  chyte   11:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Islamic Golden Age
✅. North America1000 17:25, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:VITAL article - Evad37 &#91;talk] 09:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 01:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - There's really nothing wrong with it. Everything seems to be in order. Anarchyte (talk) 11:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support Multiple suggestions for improvement on talk page. Also may be oversourced in places. --CSJJ104 (talk) 20:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Support- Rubbish computer 17:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Decolonization
✅. North America1000 18:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Level 4 vital article - Evad37 &#91;talk] 09:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - Referenced well, correct formatting. Only 3 minor sections need updating. Anarchyte (talk) 11:34, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support High traffic. Large sections without citations. --CSJJ104 (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support As is Level 4 vital article, appears poorly cited. Rubbish computer 23:38, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Support High traffic, and so few sources. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Synchrony and diachrony
✅. North America1000 18:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Stub class, high importance article --CSJJ104 (talk) 21:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - -- Anar  chyte   06:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support- I got completely wrong statistics and opposed this as a result, either because I was tired and clicked on the wrong thing or because my computer was playing up. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused. Support because it's a high importance stub and it's got over 2,000 page views in the past 30 days. Rubbish computer 17:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support says 2675 views in 30 days, which is about 85/day. High importance article with basically no content. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Mathematics
The article has bad referencing in some parts, a few  and   tags. -- Anar  chyte   07:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC) ✅ Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support-Level 1 vital article, over 90,000 page views in the past 30 days (more than 100 times as many as this page!), about something so everyday, should at least be a Good article. Rubbish computer 19:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support Was thinking of nominating this the other day. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC) (readding since it got deleted by an edit conflict)
 * 3) Support - Yeh. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 20:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Coleco Gemini


✅. North America1000 17:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: North America1000 07:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support Quite often viewed article rated stub class --CSJJ104 (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support -- ☣  Anar chyte  ☣ 09:50, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support-For same reason stated by CSJJ104. Rubbish computer 17:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Judge
✅. North America1000 20:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Turn the enormous list of forms of address into a table and the rest of the article turns out to be alarmingly short. TBP25 (talk) 12:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. Rated at B-class, but is weak in sourcing. Good candidate for expansion too. North America1000 07:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support -- Anar  chyte   11:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Absolutely rubbish referencing, about a basic subject, ranked as top importance in Wikiproject law and a Level 4 vital article in society. Rubbish computer 19:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Schoolwork

 * High class article still in stub after over 7 years of existence. -- Anar  chyte   09:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support High-class article stub. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support --CSJJ104 (talk) 23:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - by the way, changed style of the support. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

✅ Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Skurfing (sport)



 * For starters, presently has zero sources/inline citations, with just one external link. North America1000 10:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support --CSJJ104 (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Comment Is this actually a serious thing? Because I've never heard of it before, and I'm usually quite knowledgeable about sport. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yep, see below for starters. North America1000 02:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

✅ -- Anar  chyte   11:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support -- Anar  chyte   11:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support I guess it is a thing, in which case it needs work. This is the third support vote. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Wheel and axle


. North America1000 00:39, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Level 4 vital article - Evad37 &#91;talk] 10:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 01:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - Seems to cover all points fairly accurately. Well referenced, lots of pictures, etc. Anarchyte (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. North America1000 11:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose - As per Anarchyte, it covers all the points, is well referenced and has good pictures, what needs drastically improving on it? Joseph2302 (talk) 01:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose - A satisfactory article (see reasons above.) Rubbish computer 17:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Beast (Trojan horse)
(removed unapproved template previously in place here) North America1000 00:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No references, old article and needs updating. Seems like an advert as well. Anarchyte (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - this is an old type of Trojan horse that does not affect today's society. It did prior to 2005 or so, as it had affected XP's. The virus was discontinued on late 2004 and would have its viral issues solved by most antiviruses. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose As above, it's not relevant nowadays, and therefore its improvement is less important than other articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support Definitely can be improved, and has reasonable high page view stats, 1300 in 30 days. In reply to concerns mentioned above, no it is not relevant today, but neither are the historical articles we improve. --CSJJ104 (talk) 19:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose No longer seems sufficiently important due to its irrelevance. Rubbish computer 11:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Why has this been marked as unapproved? It seems to meet neither the criteria of 21 days with no discussion, last comment was 7 June, and does not have three net opposed votes, as indicated at the top of this page is necessary. --CSJJ104 (talk) 10:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The way things have been done here in the past, unless I'm missing something, is that after three opposes, unless there are also three supports, entries are not approved. At the top of the page, it states, "Unsuccessful nominations can be archived after 21 days of no discussion or after 3 net opposing votes." North America1000 16:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

. North America1000 00:39, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment – I get it now. Since there's a support above, the total net opposing votes total 2. As such, I have removed the unapproved template above. North America1000 00:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Evergreen Park, Illinois
Comment: Who nominated this? You need to sign it. Rubbish computer 22:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Bad referencing in some sections, needs an overall cleanup. -- Anar  chyte   11:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * From the page history, it appears to have been who nominated it. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I put instead of ~ on the page, sorry. --  Anar  chyte   01:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

. North America1000 00:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support Mid importance on both its projects, over 2000 page views in the past 30 days, plenty of work left to do. Rubbish computer 00:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Decent enough article already. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Schauenburg Castle
Comment: I'm afraid that is incorrect, there are 207 views in the last 30 days at the time of writing this. Rubbish computer 15:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Very basic article that could be expanded on via the versions in other languages. Anarchyte (talk) 05:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support In need of copyedit of language used. --CSJJ104 (talk) 19:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Low importance on WikiProjects Switzerland and History, there are 2031 articles needing copy edit as I write this, some of them many times longer than this. Rubbish computer 00:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose Low-importance article, only 8 views in last 30 days. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I meant 8 views per day. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

. North America1000 00:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Riemann zeta function
. North America1000 00:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * High-importance article, huge number of hits, but some completely unreferenced sections- think B class is a bit generous. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - you don't simply ask for citations in this WikiProject. This WikiProject seems better suited for improving the articles' content, not really so much the citations. Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 04:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Colonial Spanish Horse


Comment: Actually 834 views in 30 days. Once again, either I was falling asleep or my computer was. Sorry. Rubbish computer 22:28, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Comment: I did vote Support before but Northamerica1000 was the proposer. Sorry to point out mistakes.Rubbish computer 15:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Has plenty of potential for improvements. North America1000 12:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose I've switched to oppose because of its ranking as Low importance and modest page views. Rubbish computer 12:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose If the proposer doesn't think it's worthy any more, there's no hope of it being approve. Also, low-importance. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:49, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

. North America1000 00:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Corazon Aquino
. North America1000 00:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * A Level 4 vital article in People, an article on a President of the Philippines from 1986 to 1992, appears to be seriously lacking references in places, should be easy to improve. Emphasising the article's importance, a Did You Know...? fact from it has been featured on the main page 6 years in a row and a news item related to the article was on the main page in 2009 verify.Rubbish computer 12:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support It hasn't had a DYK every year, it's had an "On this day" which is for selected anniversaries. Definitely still shows its importance though, and article needs some improving. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Patron saints of occupations and activities
. North America1000 00:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The refimprove template doesn't do it justice; there are easily 200 unsourced statements in this article, they just don't have cn tags. This article has also been marked as needing immediate attention. Rubbish computer 23:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose All it needs is 200 citations,and if you look at the articles of the saints, most of them will probably have citations you can use. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Aristotelian Society
In need of formatting, and expansion. --CSJJ104 (talk) 20:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC) . North America1000 00:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support --  Anar  chyte   07:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support-Rated as stub yet has Top importance in Philosophy. Rubbish computer 19:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Criminal transmission of HIV
. North America1000 00:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Neutrality problems since May 2014, viewed often, poor referencing. While there are many articles with neutrality problems this one seems important regardless of how it is ranked; it is something I imagine some people have heard of but few have in-depth knowledge of. If Wikipedia had a good article on this it would improve public knowledge. Rubbish computer 12:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Bolo palma


. North America1000 00:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * A variant of bowls that dates to the 16th century. Presently has only one source. North America1000 15:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. Rubbish computer 17:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose In my opinion, this article should just be added as a section of Bowls instead- it quite clearly defines itself as a variation of bowls. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Civil ceremony
✅. North America1000 17:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Old article, most of it is copypasted from a CC-BY website. Multiple issues. Anarchyte (talk) 05:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. North America1000 22:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support-What a rubbish article it is at the moment. Rubbish computer 17:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - Could do with some asking for being merged? Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 10:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Geography of ice cream


. North America1000 00:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Plenty of potential for expansion in the various country sections, several sections have no sources, and some would benefit from more. North America1000 20:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support Rubbish computer 17:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Faraday cage
. Everyone appears to disagree with improving that article. All right. Since ClueBot III is shut down at the moment, I will have to do that dirty work. Huh. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 08:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * So many hits on this, and so little sourcing on it. Mid-importance on physics. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - it seems pretty complete, other than the citations. This WikiProject appears to suit best with improved content, not really the citations. Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 04:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose-- Reasons above and only mid importance. Rubbish computer 11:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - Reasons above. Rayukk (talk) 09:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - Ah, I feel a feeling that the content is complete. Content improvement is most important in this WikiProject, not necessarily the citations. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 08:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Goat meat

 * Goat meat is claimed to be far better in taste than pork, beef, lamb(sheep), chicken, fish or any other eatable living creature. Many people say that "I don't like goat meat" just because they can't afford goat meat as price of goat meat is far higher than other meats. Read this complete Washington post article Goat Meat- The Final Frontier -Washington Post, even they claim that nutritionwise and tastewise "Goat meat" is best among all. They described Goat meat as "Higher Price, Superior Product", so article of this superior product should be superior, we should spread awareness among all carnivorous people. If you hate goat meat then read this New York Times article How I Learned to Love Goat Meat -The New York Times -- Human 3015  knock knock • 14:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support because of the page views, I have no opinion on whether goat meat is good or bad to eat. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. An article about a staple food in several countries that can be improved. North America1000 14:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - because of the page views, and also the need to put more information about the information about goat meat production. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 02:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

✅ Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 02:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Tandoori Chicken
✅ Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 08:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This is one of most famous food item in Indian subcontinent. This is claimed to be best Chicken dish on Earth.  Human 3015  Call me maybe!! • 14:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - but that is only the high number of views per day. Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 20:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support Rubbish computer 00:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support -- Human 3015  knock knock • 07:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Mechanic
✅. North America1000 10:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Stub class. -- Anar  chyte   07:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Way too small. P.S., I changed your nomination look. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 07:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support -- Human 3015  knock knock • 22:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support--In addition to the above points it is unreferenced. Rubbish computer 10:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Chicken nugget
3.Support: A highly influential food item. I won't chicken out of supporting this one. Rubbish computer 00:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC) ✅ Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Need more nuggets of information. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 02:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support – Easily expandable and receives lots of page hits (5,754 times in the last 30 days, as of this post). North America1000 10:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Important food item and easily expandable. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 11:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - adding hits... Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 06:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Geography of Iceland


✅. North America1000 04:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Start-class article with potential and opportunities for expansion and improvements. North America1000 10:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support Easily expandable especially with regards to geology. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 11:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per above. Rubbish computer 00:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support Important article that is in a really bad shape.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Support - event though it has been approved. Just for the record. I think the article has every potential for expansion.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Geography of Argentina
✅. North America1000 07:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The article is currently a C class but it has a lot of potential for improvement and expansion. Ssbbplayer (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per above. Rubbish computer 09:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support Definite room for improve especially in regards to the "Regions" and "Geographical politics" sections. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - per Presidentman.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Broadband
✅. North America1000 07:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Could be expanded and improved. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 20:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support: also Top Importance on Wikiproject Telecommunications and High Importance on Wikiproject Media, but is only Start class (see Talk:Broadband. Rubbish computer 09:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per Rubbish computer. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support?: Important telecommunications topic, but a bit too complicated for the layman to improve. Esquivalience t 19:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Support?: - with the joint help of the project this article could be simplified..amongst other things.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Wilson College (Pennsylvania)
✅. North America1000 07:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Former women's college, American liberal arts college. Needs sincere revision and some added information. Ladysif (talk) 05:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per above. Rubbish computer 09:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per above. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support just have to agree with above. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation
✅. North America1000 07:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * An association that covers the Whole of South Asia including India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh, with about 1.5 billion people living in it.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support Definitely needs more citations as well as copyediting. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 11:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support: only C class. Rubbish computer 09:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support: per rubbish computer.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Everett Stern
. North America1000 04:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * "Whistleblower" for the HSBC scandal, 2015 Republican senate candidate for Pennsylvania. Owner of Tactical Rabbit. Article really needs to be gone through and fixed, period. It seems as though the subject is writing about himself. Ladysif (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose per the fact that it may not meet WP:GNG. Rubbish computer 09:15, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose per Rubbish computer. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose as above, he might not meet WP:GNG, and even if he does, not sure how much can be added to the article anyway. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Moral evil
. North America1000 03:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't believe an article about something so fundamental and universal can be a stub. It has one reference and is 1,368 bytes at the time of writing, and hasn't yet been given an importance rating. It hasn't been edited since last September. Rubbish computer 12:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support I cannot believe that this is a stub, and the only source someone could find is GCSE Bitesize (which is a revision website for 16-yr olds). Joseph2302 (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: What I said about when it had last been edited is now inaccurate as I have edited it. Rubbish computer 10:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Support This article really needs improvement. -- Human 3015  knock knock • 22:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Ice cream social


✅. North America1000 07:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Stub article with potential for improvements. North America1000 06:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - although the name "Ice cream party" would be much more known than "Ice cream social". Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 04:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support Because it has over 1200 page views in the past 30 days. Rubbish computer 00:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support: common activity in the summertime. Esquivalience t 03:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Support: per esquvalience.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Scandal

 * A pretty major topic, yet the article has little information.  Horai  551 00:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support – Has much potential for various improvements. North America1000 00:59, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support – definite potentiel for expansion.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support: Only Start class so plenty of room for improvement, 7855 page views in 30 days at the time of writing. Rubbish computer 12:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. Esquivalience t 01:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Fried potatoes
Approved. Esquivalience t 23:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is for you food lovers out there and would include all types of food that use fried potatoes in their recipes.Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - fried potatoes are a popular subject. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 08:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose per low page view stats. --Rubbish computer 17:43, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support because disambigs make it easy for us to achieve DYK. Are disambiguation pages hidden in Google? If yes, then maybe that is partly responsible for low page view stats?  Bananasoldier  (talk) 05:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Support – A globally-consumed food; the page has much potential for improvements. North America1000 03:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 5) Support per nom - Evad37 &#91;talk] 11:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Animal killing
Approved. Esquivalience t 23:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about the various capacities in which the human-animal relationship results in death, be it religious sacrifice, euthanasia of pets, slaughtering animals for meat, hunting game etc.Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom. --Rubbish computer 11:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - expansion possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support per nom - Evad37 &#91;talk] 11:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Snow lantern

 * Expansion is definitely possible. As well as overall improvements.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose due to the fairly low page view statistics and its Low Importance on all of its WikiProjects. --Rubbish computer 00:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I withdraw this nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Måns Zelmerlöw

 * Article that could reach B-class or higher with the help of this project. Expansion is possible at places and article could need some c/e. (winner of the world biggest televised music competition Eurovision 2015). Many hits still more than 2 months after win so its not a reaction for that achievement.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose as I've been over it and I really don't see what is wrong with it. Rubbish computer 01:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, thanks! I guess I am being overly pedantic. As I am the main contributor to the article. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I withdraw this nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Hédi Fried

 * Article in need of expansion. Important and interesting enough to justify inclusion in the project. Expansion is possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose Can't tell importance but if you don't count the day it was created or the day after, at the time of writing it has had only 24 page views in 11 days.--Rubbish computer 04:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It had about 125 views in its first 24 hours.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:44, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I know but there may have been a lot of initial interest in it because it was a new article. Rubbish computer 12:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I withdraw this nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Flesh
Approved. North America1000 23:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Currently only a dictionary term, as a mere Wikipedia article. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 09:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - I don't see how this can be expanded beyond a definition, considering that adding details would be a significant overlap with articles such as muscle. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 11:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support potential for expansion. Rubbish computer 09:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support expansion is possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Support expandable by describing the different types of flesh in their own sections, along with uses. Overlap with more detailed articles is okay, per WP:Summary style. - Evad37 &#91;talk] 07:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 5) Support as an expandable and important topic. Esquivalience t 23:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Brain damage
Approved. North America1000 23:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Important topic with high importance with great potential of expansion. Horai  551 00:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support: Only Start class, Level 4 vital article in WikiProject Science, High Importance in WikiProject Medicine, over 7000 page views in the past 30 days. Rubbish computer 12:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support: - could definitely be improved.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Also, could potentially be merged with brain injury. - Evad37 &#91;talk] 08:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Detmold child

 * Interesting article in my opinion. In need of an expansion and c/e. Expansion is very possible and justifies inclusion in this project. I hope I could get the assistance from you.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose per 153 page views in 30 days, have copyedited it.--Rubbish computer 04:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

. North America1000 00:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I withdraw this nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Viral phenomenon
Approved. North America1000 00:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * High-importance article, only start class.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:41, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom and there being over 3000 page views in the past 30 days. Rubbish computer 08:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Expansion and general cleanup are needed. Rubbish computer 08:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - expansion possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - expansion possible, and high page views. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 05:31, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Communism in Russia
Approved. North America1000 00:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about communism in the country of russia, and the later soviet union. Shockingly this doesn't exist.Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - as per nom. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 09:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom. --Rubbish computer 11:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - per above.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Forest Sami

 * An article I created. Interesting subject in my opinion but I think it could definitely need help with expansion, prose, c/e overall work. With the help of the people of this project. BabbaQ (talk) 21:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose At C class already, Low Importance on its WikiProjects, only 150 views in past 30 days.--Rubbish computer 04:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - I don't see the importance anyway. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 07:10, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I withdraw this nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

. North America1000 04:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Sin
Approved. North America1000 04:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Important topic for theistic religions - level 4 vital article. The last week it was chosen (actually fairly recently), I was the only one who edited it, and only to remove Christian bias, which it still suffers from now. Esquivalience t 03:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom and its general importance as a subject. --Rubbish computer 09:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - per nom. High importance.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - per nom and the fact that there still needs improvement. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 21:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Economy of South America

 * Very important article, rated Top Importance, yet very small. Horai  551 00:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. Rubbish computer 12:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment:Couldn't write my rationale for supporting as my phone was playing up. No Quality rating but reads like a Stub. Easy to expand, for example on the Economy of South America section, which consists only of a list. Top Importance on WikiProject South America, High Importance on WikiProject Economics, Mid Importance on WikiProjects Business and Argentina. 1480 page views in 30 days. Per the article's lede, it is about 382 million people, 6 percent of the world's population. Rubbish computer 12:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

approved - Evad37 &#91;talk] 03:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) support - I support this because of the obvious expansion that can be made.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 00:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Assassination attempts

 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about the concept and history of assassination attempts, rather than just a list of certain AAs.Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) support - could be expanded.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom. --Rubbish computer 00:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Isn't the broad concept already covered at Assassination&thinsp;? - Evad37 &#91;talk] 07:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Then in that case do you think this should be folded into assasinations? After all, most of these broad-topic disambiguation pages were creates eons ago (this is from 2008) and times have changed.--Coin945 (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Approved. North America1000 02:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - easy to expand, and it could add expansion of Assassination and the types of assassinations done throughout history. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 05:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Shelby Gem Factory
Approved. North America1000 18:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Currently a C Class article with opportunities improvement, per remarks left at Talk (DYK nomination) by a newbie.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support – An interesting topic, particularly as per "The factory makes more varieties of synthetic and man-made gemstones than any other company in the world". North America1000 15:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support – Interesting. Expansion possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support per its significance, as highlighted by Northamerica1000 above. --Rubbish computer 18:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Sveriges Television

 * A current B-class article that is hardly sources anywhere and is in my opinion on the brink of becoming a Start-class article if anything. Could need help with sources, c/e, etc..--BabbaQ (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose I agree that this shouldn't be B class, but it is a decent article: it just needs more inline footnotes and some minor cleanup.


 * Agreed. I withdraw this nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Editor-in-chief
approved. North America1000 16:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The article is about a subject which gets a high number of hits each month. It needs expansion, c/e, sourcing, etc.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per the importance of this subject. There is lots of references to expand the stub article.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Just as Doug Coldwell says. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 10:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support per all of above points. Rubbish computer 03:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Decriminalization of marijuana
approved. North America1000 15:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about the decriminilisation in general, rather than just US.Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom. --Rubbish computer 17:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom as well.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support – the potential is there, if anyone wants to expand upon the topic at this page. North America1000 15:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Spring Scattering Stars
Unapproved. North America1000 14:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Could do with some more work. Hafspajen (talk) 19:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support as with 137 page views in its first 15 days there appears to be significant interest in this. Rubbish computer 08:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support -expansion possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Portrait of Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier and his wife
Unapproved. North America1000 14:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks to be plenty of info available to expand that stub. Hafspajen (talk) 17:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per 1993 page views in the past 90 days. Rubbish computer 08:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - per page views above.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Antacid
Approved. North America1000 16:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * High number of hits. Article can definitely be expanded from its current state. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 15:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Good opportunity to expand prose too. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 09:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per above points, high page views and its high importance in WikiProject Pharmocology. --Rubbish computer 18:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Squeegee
Approved. North America1000 16:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * This cleaning tool, funnily enough, requires a cleanup, due to its lack of references and too little images. It could also be expanded further. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 21:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 00:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom: also needs original research removing, and has over 2000 views in the past 30 days. Rubbish computer 12:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - per nom. needs some improvements.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Ganges Delta
Unapproved. North America1000 14:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Only start class, the largest delta in the world. Room for expansion and improvement.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom and 4425 page views in the past 30 days (at the time of writing). --Rubbish computer 00:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - expansion needed.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Sundarbans
Unapproved. North America1000 14:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Largest single block of tidal halophytic mangrove forest in the world, article has room for improvement. Home of the Royal Bengal Tiger.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose Article is thoroughly written and well-referenced. I don't see any room for real improvement beyond possible expansion, but I also don't see any room for where the article can be expanded since its coverage it so thorough. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 11:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per its failure to reach Good Article status and the room for improvement suggested by this. Rubbish computer 00:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - room for improvements.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Climate of Argentina
Unapproved. North America1000 14:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Currently a C Class article with opportunities for expansion and improvement. Ssbbplayer (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per above. Rubbish computer 09:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Thorough and well-referenced. No expansion needed IMO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - I apologise if I disrupt your progress, but I think that you are simply doing the TAFI work itself. However, keep up the good work of expansion of that article! Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 20:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Support - expansion possible, as well as overall improvements.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Metapolitics
Unapproved. North America1000 14:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Similar to metaphilosophy, but for political philosophies instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PWNGWN (talk • contribs) 22:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Who nominated this? You need to sign it. Rubbish computer 08:34, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per the importance this subject seems to have. Rubbish computer 08:34, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support expansion possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Desktop computer
Approved. North America1000 16:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Article contains a lot of original research and may be out of date. 54,357 page views in the past 90 days. sstflyer 10:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom. --Rubbish computer 15:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support – Nice candidate for improvement, and receives a lot of page views. North America1000 16:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

News program
Approved. North America1000 16:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Article needs expansion, It is about a everyday medium and is in a bad state right now. Needs c/e, sourcing, etc.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per the importance of this subject. There is lots of references to expand the stub article.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - per Doug Coldwell. And please note the high daily no. of page views. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 10:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support per DC. --Rubbish computer 16:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Tales from the Crypt
Unapproved. North America1000 14:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about the TotC media franchise in general.Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom and high page view stats. --Rubbish computer 11:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) support  - per rubbish computer reasonings.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

The Biggest Loser Asia

 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about a reality TV show that aired two seasons (both of which independently have articles).Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose as the other two articles seem to sufficiently cover this. --Rubbish computer 11:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It doiesn't make sense to have content forks without the main topic. It's like having The Simpsons (season 13) without a the Simpsons article...--Coin945 (talk) 14:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Unapproved. North America1000 14:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Racist music
Unapproved. North America1000 14:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article could also be renamed Racism and music or Race in music.Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support to cover primary topic but unsure of what to rename to. --Rubbish computer 11:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support expansion possible. --BabbaQ (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Military history of Latin America
Unapproved. North America1000 14:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about the military history of the entire south american continent. Could be renamed to "...South America".Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom. --Rubbish computer 11:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Coins of China
Unapproved. North America1000 14:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about the coins of modern China, as opposed to ancient China (a B-class).Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - as per nom. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 09:15, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose per low page view stats. --Rubbish computer 17:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - expansion possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Christmas pageant
Unapproved. North America1000 14:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about christmas pageants, which believe it or not, are not covered here.Coin945 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose per low page views, having an article on pageant looks like it would be a higher priority. --Rubbish computer 11:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Narendra Modi
unapproved And I would have said "oppose" anyway, as per the opposers. Plus the effect of improvement to that article may not provide much influence. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 10:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * A B class article with high numbers of hits and tagged with improvement template . Withdrawn the nomination. —  San ska ri  Hangout 15:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - improvements can be made to keep it a B-class article. --BabbaQ (talk) 15:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose per the guideline at : "Though there are no firm criteria, in general, ideal TAFI articles are... Not targets of controversy. Keep in mind that controversial articles (articles that are the subject of heated discussion or edit warring) can be very difficult to improve within a week." --Rubbish computer 16:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose per what Rubbish computer says. Also, Modi's page is not a single page. This would mean many edits on various pages. Also, his upcoming USA visit would anyways attract a lot many good/bad editors and cleaning that up would be a job in first place. Also, instructions say; "Needing of improvement, with expansion opportunity" (emphasis added). There is no scope for huge expansion here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose Why would we need a BLP at TAFI? I concur with Dharmadhyaksha. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Karla Faye Tucker
approved P.S. approx. 150 views per day. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 10:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Crime bio that could be expanded, better sourcing, c/e etc. High number of views each month.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per page view stats and the subject's overall significance and Mid Importance on WikiProjects Crime and Biography. --Rubbish computer 18:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support highly notable person, page views merit article improvement. Safehaven86 (talk) 15:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support per that of User:Safehaven86.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Allegra Versace
approved Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 10:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Article with more than 10.000 hits each month, but that needs expansion (which is possible), it needs c/e and better sourcing. Could need help to be improved per the high number of hits.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom [although I have copyedited it.] Rubbish computer 21:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom. There are several pictures of her on Flickr - if someone would inquire to some of these if they would lower their copyright license from "All Rights Reserved" to "Attribution" odds are one will.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 17:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support high number of page views and readily available sourcing that has potential to significantly improve article. Safehaven86 (talk) 15:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Berry (botany)
not approved Been over 2 weeks and no discussion. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 03:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Article split from Berry specifically to cover berries in botany. Esquivalience t 04:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose as this appears to be a decent enough article already. Rubbish computer 08:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) support - some things could be done, that justifies it being part of TAFI.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - there are worse articles to improve. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose - seems good already. Also, it appears to be full of botany jargon. The original Berry article is more general and suitable for general editors like us. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 05:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)