Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Gillingham F.C. seasons

Gillingham F.C. seasons
Another list based on the ever-popular football club seasons format - please let me know if anything needs amending or correcting.

Cheers!!!

ChrisTheDude 10:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I think additional research should be done for the top scorers from Gillingham's seasons outside the Football League.
 * - as set out below, no source for this information exists


 * Maybe the empty fields in 'League Cup' and 'Other competitions' can be coloured or maybe the cells can be removed?
 * - I feel this would make the table look worse rather than better, I would prefer not to do it


 * I think the divisions in the table should be wikilinked. –
 * ✅ - I have linked the first instance of every new division, I don't feel it is necessary to link on every single line

Ilse@ 17:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Comments from
 * Support Good work.  Per above it'd be a good idea to wikilink the first instance of each new league but I understand how difficult it can be to find early days and non-league scorers so not expecting much there.  Also don't feel there's a need to change the format of the table.  The Rambling Man 19:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Just to confirm, I have every book published to date on the Gills' history and none list the top scorers from those seasons, nor do soccerbase or allfootballers.com, beyond that I don't know what additional research could be done....... ChrisTheDude 20:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment A few minor comments.
 * Supportcool-- M i n i @  08:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * For seasons, I'd write "in the xxxx-xx season" instead of just "in xxxx-xx".


 * Full stops needed for the sentences starting "No competitive football...".

Not much, as you can see. Mattythewhite 20:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Good work. Mattythewhite 11:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Support I participated at peer review; the editor dealt with issues raised promptly, either by making changes requested or by explaining why changes would/could not be made. Only thing I've spotted since, the note in the 1921 position column about no relegation should go against 1929 as well. Well done. Struway2 13:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * ''I've added the reference to 1929 as pointed out ChrisTheDude 21:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Support I have given the Lead a very small copyedit. Other than that, like the other reviewers, I can't find any flaws with this list. It follows the Footy format, seems comprehensive and accurate. Meets all the criteria. Well done. Woodym555 14:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Support I can't find any faults. Great work. &mdash; Gasheadsteve Talk to me 18:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)