Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of municipalities in the Northwest Territories/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Giants2008 02:08, 24 March 2014.

List of municipalities in the Northwest Territories

 * Nominators: Hwy43 (talk) 23:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC) and (talk)

This is the sixth of thirteen lists of "municipalities in province/territory" within the Canadian topic for municipalities to go through FLC (and fifth in the past eight months). The intent is to obtain FL status for all thirteen to achieve a featured topic. This is the first territory to be nominated. It meets the same standards as the recently promoted Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Saskatchewan equivalents with lessons learned from each incorporated into this list. Hwy43 (talk) 23:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: (having stumbled here from my FLC discussion page). Image review: All images check out okay, except for one: File:Downtown Yellowknife 2 second version.jpg = missing info in date field, also the editor that changed the original image should be credited in addition to the original author. Those should be easy image fixes. Otherwise, rest of the image pages look pretty good. Keep me posted when that's addressed, and I'll revisit. Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * , this comment is puzzling. FLC reviews involve fixing things on the file pages of utilized images? I haven't seen that previously. It would be wrong for us to speculate the correct date for the missing date field. Hwy43 (talk) 08:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * , from my experience, WP:FAC pages don't pass without successfully going through an image review, yes. I don't see why WP:FLC should have a lesser standard. Again, these issues should be quite easy to address. Keep me posted, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, I see that image is tagged for moving to Commons, you can use Moving_files_to_the_Commons to help assist with that. Hope that's helpful, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Done. Okay, I went ahead and took the liberty of taking care of it for you! :) The image is now on Commons. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 06:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . Learned a few new things today. I studied what you just did and now have a better understanding of what was being requested and how to address this on my own should this arise again. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 07:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh good, I'm glad! Now that image review is done, I'll see about getting to rest of review soon. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Support. Looks quite good. Only thing I'd suggest is using Portal bar to add some relevant portals as a footer at the bottom of the article, or just one or two in the See also section. Great job, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 07:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Done – added to See also section and did the same for others in the List of municipalities in Canada series. Thanks for the review! Hwy43 (talk) 08:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Support - I have no issues with the list.  Aureez  ( Talk ) 03:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Support. Looks fine to me. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you and  for your reviews and support! Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 02:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.