Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of vice presidents of the Philippines/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC).

List of vice presidents of the Philippines

 * Notified: Klbrain, Howard the Duck, WP Tambayan Philippines, WP Politics

Has 9 inline citations, of which only two are actually sources, the rest are notes. The formatting in the age section needs some serious reworking, and most of the unofficial presidents need further explanation as to the circumstances that led them to get that classification. Top contributor not notified, as they were checkuser-blocked years ago. Hog Farm Talk 15:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No contest. This list has a good run and I'm no longer interested in keeping this at FL standards. Howard the Duck (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd move for this to be speedily closed and delisted unless someone wants to put in the work. Howard the Duck (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment -- I can attempt to resolve the issues, as this list has potential to meet the FL criteria. However, it does have a few issues. Before making any bold changes, I want to ask what is the use of "By age", "Oldest living vice presidents of the Philippines", and "Timeline of living vice-presidents" sections? Most of these sections appear to be WP:OR. Recently, a few lists, including Living presidents of the United States, List of presidents of India by longevity, etc. have been deleted. So, I think that these sections can boldly be removed from the list. @, will that be fine? Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * - I think some of those were merged in through AFDs. Hog Farm Talk 17:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @ Yeah, they were indeed merged in this list, but these sections still is full of original research. I have reformatted the main list, and am in process of adding citations.  Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

I have boldly removed list of vice presidents by (1) age (2) longest/oldest living (3) timeline, as all of these lists are indiscriminate collection of trivial lists. Anyone who disagrees is free to apply WP:BRD. As for the main list, I have reformatted the list, and have added various sources for all the vice presidents. If the structure and sourcing appears fine, I can do the same for "Unofficial vice presidents". The work remaining to do: Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Update (November 18, 2021)
 * Reformatting the lead section, and adding references there.
 * Adding ALT text to images.
 * Reformatting and adding context to the "Unofficial vice presidents" section.
 * Other general fixes like correcting some information, fixing the wording and prose, misc.

Most of the reformatting things have been done. ALT text is added. The only issues left are: Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Update (November 24, 2021)
 * Sources and copy-edit of the lead.
 * Some context in the "Unofficial vice presidents" section. Will do both soon.


 * Update (December 20, 2021)
 * Most of the changes I intended to make have been made. (my edits:, , ). The only thing I see still outstanding is adding context for Unofficial vice presidents. Except that, I think this list is completely re-written. @, has the list improved? Would appreciate your comments for improvements. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * My primary question is if the ref for each VP is meant to source the ruling parties, presidents for each time span, etc, or if that does not have an effective source. Hog Farm Talk 03:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The reference for each vice president is supporting everything except (1) party affiliation (2) lifespan. For some cases, the citations are supporting everything, including the above mentioned two points. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

At this point, the nomination has been open for 2.5 months, with substantial work done and no votes to delist. As such, I'm going to close this nomination as kept; if anyone feels it still does not meet the criteria, it can be renominated. -- Pres N  23:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.